Factor analyses of a social support scale using two methods
Evaluation and comparison of the factor structure of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS) using both confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with two samples of people living with HIV/AIDS in China.
Secondary analyses were conducted with data from two comparable samples of 320 people living with HIV/AIDS from the same hospital using the same inclusion criteria. The first sample of 120 was collected in 2006, and the second sample of 200 was collected in 2012. For each sample, CFA was first performed on the original four-factor structure to check model fit, followed by EFA to explore other factor structures and a subsequent CFA for model fit statistics to be compared to the original four-factor CFA.
In both samples, CFA on the originally hypothesized four-factor structure yielded an acceptable model fit. The EFA yielded a two-factor solution in both samples, with different items included in each factor for the two samples. Comparison of CFA on the a priori four-factor structure and the new two-factor structure in both samples indicated that both factor structures were of acceptable model fit, with the four-factor model performing slightly better than the two-factor model.
Factor structure of the MOS-SSS is method-dependent, with CFA supporting a four-factor structure, while EFA yielded a two-factor structure in two separate samples. We need to be careful in selecting the analytic method when applying the MOS-SSS to various samples and choose the factor structure that best fits the theoretical model.
KeywordsMedical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey Factor analysis CFA EFA Chinese
This is a secondary data analysis on two studies that were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Washington and Ditan Hospital and were performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All participants in the two studies gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study were omitted and all data collected were unidentified.
- 2.Arriola, K. J., Spaulding, A. C., Booker, C. A., Williams, C., Avery, A., Porter, N. J. et al. (2013). Understanding the relationship between social support and physical and mental well-being among jail detainees living with HIV. Journal of Health Psychology, 1–10. doi: 10.1177/1359105313496447
- 17.Soares, A., Biasoli, I., Scheliga, A., Baptista, R. L., Brabo, E. P., Morais, J. C., et al. (2012). Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Medical Outcomes Study-Social Support Survey in Hodgkin’s lymphoma survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(8), 1895–1900.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Li., H. (2012). Psychometric measurement of the simplified Chinese medical outcomes study social support survey (MOS-SSS-C) and its application in HIV/AIDS patients. Unpublished PhD thesis. Central South University, China.Google Scholar
- 31.Chen, W. T., Shiu, C. S., Yang, J. P., Simoni, J. M., Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. I., Lee, T. S., et al. (2013). Antiretroviral therapy (ART) side effect impacted on quality of life, and depressive symptomatology: A mixed-method study. Journal of AIDS & Clinical Research, 4, 218.Google Scholar
- 32.Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill Inc.Google Scholar
- 34.Munro, B. H., Duffy, M. E., Brancato, V., Newton, S., & Talbot, L. (2005). Statistical methods for health care research (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Co.Google Scholar
- 35.Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- 37.Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar