Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 399–404 | Cite as

The Caregiver Quality of Life Index–Cancer (CQOLC) in Singapore: a new preliminary factor structure for caregivers of ambulatory patients with cancer

  • Rathi MahendranEmail author
  • Haikel A. Lim
  • Joanne Chua
  • Chao Xu Peh
  • Siew Eng Lim
  • Ee Heok Kua
Brief Communication

Abstract

Purpose

The Caregiver Quality of Life Index–Cancer (CQOLC) is used worldwide to determine levels of quality of life of caregivers of patients with cancer; however, the few studies examining the underlying factor structure of the CQOLC have revealed differences between Western and Eastern cultures. This study sought to confirm the differences in the factor structures between the original CQOLC and a Taiwanese (Mandarin) version.

Methods

A total of 183 caregivers from a cancer center in Singapore participated in this exploratory cross-sectional study. All participants completed the CQOLC and a sociodemographic form; 30 participants repeated the CQOLC two weeks later.

Results

Test–retest reliability was adequate for the CQOLC; however, confirmatory factor analyses did not support either the original four-factor model or the Taiwanese five-factor model. Exploratory factor analyses suggested the retaining of five factors to form a 25-item Singapore version (CQOLC-S25): burden, physical/practical concerns, emotional reactivity, self-needs, and social support. Inter-factor and factor scale correlations were positively significant for all factors except Support, which was negatively correlated with emotional reactivity and self-needs.

Conclusions

Cross-cultural differences, which require further investigations, appear to underlie the utility and understanding of the CQOLC. More research is needed to better understand the needs of Singapore caregivers.

Keywords

Caregivers Cancer Quality of life Singapore CQOLC 

References

  1. 1.
    Singapore Ministry of Health. (2013). Principal Causes of Death. Singapore Health Facts. Retrieved December 20 2013, from http://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/home/statistics/Health_Facts_Singapore.html.
  2. 2.
    Gaugler, J. E., Hanna, N., Linder, J., Given, C. W., Tolbert, V., Kataria, R., et al. (2005). Cancer caregiving and subjective stress: A multi-site, multi-dimensional analysis. Psycho-oncology, 14(9), 771–785. doi: 10.1002/pon.916.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weitzner, M. A., Jacobsen, P. B., Wagner, H., Friedland, J., & Cox, C. (1999). The caregiver quality of life index-cancer (CQOLC) scale: Development and validation of an instrument to measure quality of life of the family caregiver of patients with cancer. Quality of Life Research, 8(1–2), 55–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weitzner, M. A., Meyers, C. A., Steinbruecker, S., Saleeba, A. K., & Sandifer, S. D. (1997). Developing a care giver quality-of-life instrument: Preliminary steps. Cancer Practice, 5(1), 25–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grov, E. K., & Dahl, A. A. (2010). Quality of life measures in caregivers of patients with cancer. In V. R. Preedy & R. R. Watson (Eds.), Handbook of disease burdens and quality of life measures (Vol. 1, pp. 2935–2946). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-78665-0_171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wadhwa, D., Burman, D., Swami, N., Rodin, G., Lo, C., & Zimmermann, C. (2013). Quality of life and mental health in caregivers of outpatients with advanced cancer. Psycho-oncology, 22(2), 403–410. doi: 10.1002/pon.2104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leow, M. Q. H., Chan, M.-F., & Chan, S. W. C. (2013). Predictors of change in quality of life of family caregivers of patients near the end of life with advanced cancer. Cancer Nursing,. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000101.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yakar, H. K., & Pinar, R. (2013). Reliability and validity of Turkish version of the caregiver quality of life index cancer scale. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 14(7), 4415–4419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lafaye, A., De Chalvron, S., Houédé, N., Eghbali, H., & Cousson-Gélie, F. (2013). The caregivers quality of life cancer index scale (CQoLC): An exploratory factor analysis for validation in French cancer patients’ spouses. Quality of Life Research, 22(1), 119–122. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0113-y.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weitzner, M. A., & McMillan, S. C. (1999). The caregiver quality of life index-cancer (CQOLC) scale: Revalidation in a home hospice setting. Journal of Palliative Care, 15(2), 13–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tang, W.-R., Tang, S., & Kao, C. (2009). Psychometric testing of the caregiver quality of life index-cancer on a Taiwanese family caregiver sample. Cancer Nursing, 32(3), 220–229. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31819b5ae8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rhee, Y. S., Shin, D. O., Lee, K. M., Yu, H. J., Kim, J. W., Kim, S. O., et al. (2005). Korean version of the caregiver quality of life index-cancer (CQOLC-K). Quality of Life Research, 14(3), 899–904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Winter, J. C. F., Dodou, D., & Wieringa, P. A. (2009). Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(2), 147–181. doi: 10.1080/00273170902794206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walter, S. D., Eliasziw, M., & Donner, A. (1998). Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 17(1), 101–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (2007). Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 17(4), 571–582. doi: 10.1080/10543400701329422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. doi: 10.1177/0049124192021002005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2000). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide (2nd ed.). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ford, J. K., MacCallum, R. C., & Tait, M. (1986). The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39(2), 291–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00583.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & William, C. B. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research a content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. doi: 10.1177/0011000006288127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2009). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pan-Pacific Management Review, 12(2), 131–146.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mehta, K. K. (2006). A critical review of Singapore’s policies aimed at supporting families caring for older members. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 18(3–4), 43–57. doi: 10.1300/J031v18n03_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rathi Mahendran
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Haikel A. Lim
    • 2
  • Joanne Chua
    • 1
  • Chao Xu Peh
    • 2
  • Siew Eng Lim
    • 3
  • Ee Heok Kua
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychological MedicineNational University HospitalSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of Psychological MedicineNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS)National University Health SystemSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations