Quality of Life Research

, Volume 23, Issue 9, pp 2545–2558 | Cite as

Determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in subjective well-being in later life: a cross-country comparison in England and the USA

  • Stephen Jivraj
  • James Nazroo



To explore country-specific influences on the determinants of two forms of subjective well-being (life satisfaction and quality of life) among older adults in England and the USA.


Harmonised data from two nationally representative panel studies of individuals aged 50 and over, the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), are used. Linear regression models are fitted separately for life satisfaction and quality of life scales using cross-sectional samples in 2004. The ELSA sample was 6,733, and the HRS sample was 2,300. Standardised coefficients are reported to determine the country-specific importance of explanatory variables, and predicted values are shown to highlight the relative importance of statistically significant country-level interaction effects.


Having a disability, been diagnosed with a chronic conditions or having low household wealth are strongly associated with poorer life satisfaction and quality of life. These statistical effects are consistent in England and the USA. The association of years spent in education, however, varied between the two countries: educational inequalities have a greater adverse effect on subjective well-being in the USA compared with England.


Interventions are required to counterbalance health and socioeconomic inequalities that restrict sections of the population from enjoying satisfying and meaningful lives in older age. The differential association between education and well-being in England and the USA suggests that the provision of welfare benefits and state-funded public services in England may go some way to protect against the subsequent adverse effect of lower socioeconomic status on subjective well-being.


Subjective well-being Quality of life Life satisfaction Cross-country comparison Older age Inequalities 



This research was supported by funding for the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, which is provided by the National Institute of Aging (grants 2RO1AG7664-01A1 and 2RO1AG017644) and a consortium of UK government departments coordinated by the Office for National Statistics.


  1. 1.
    Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331–360. doi: 10.1016/S0264-9993(02)00057-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shields, M., & Price, S. W. (2005). Exploring the economic and social determinants of psychological well-being and perceived social support in England. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 168(3), 513–537. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2005.00361.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chandola, T., Ferrie, J., Sacker, A., & Marmot, M. (2007). Social inequalities in self reported health in early old age: Follow-up of prospective cohort study. BMJ, 334(7601), 990. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39167.439792.55.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith, A. E., Sim, J., Scharf, T., & Phillipson, C. (2004). Determinants of quality of life amongst older people in deprived neighbourhoods. Ageing and Society, 24(5), 793–814. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X04002569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stanley, M., & Cheek, J. (2003). Well-Being and older People: A review of the literature. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(1), 51–59. doi: 10.1177/000841740307000107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Praag, B. M., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51(1), 29–49. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00140-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vanhoutte, B. (2014). The multidimensional structure of subjective well-being in later life. Journal of Population Ageing, 7(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1007/s12062-014-9092-9.
  8. 8.
    Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Keyes, Corey L. M.: Emory U, Dept of Sociology, Tarbutton Hall, Atlanta, GA, US, 30322, American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007.
  9. 9.
    Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Netuveli, G., Wiggins, R. D., Hildon, Z., Montgomery, S. M., & Blane, D. (2006). Quality of life at older ages: evidence from the English longitudinal study of aging (wave 1). Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(4), 357–363. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.040071.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wiggins, R. D., Higgs, P. F. D., Hyde, M., & Blane, D. B. (2004). Quality of life in the third age: Key predictors of the CASP-19 measure. Ageing and Society, 24(5), 693–708. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X04002284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jivraj, S., Nazroo, J., Vanhoutte, B., & Chandola, T. (2014). Aging and subjective well-being in later life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu006.
  13. 13.
    Baird, B. M., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). Life satisfaction across the lifespan: Findings from two nationally representative panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 99(2), 183–203. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9584-9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cheung, C., & Ngan, R. M. (2011). Filtered life satisfaction and its socioeconomic determinants in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 109(2), 223–242. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9897-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meggiolaro, S. (2013). Life satisfaction among the elderly in Italy in a gender approach. Working Paper Series, N.6. Department of Statistical Science, University of Padua, Italy.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Degutis, M., & Urbonavicius, S. (2013). Determinants of subjective wellbeing in Lithuania. Inzinerine Ekonomika, 24(1), 111–118.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vanhoutte, B., & Nazroo, J. (forthcoming). Cognitive, affective and eudemonic well-being in later life: Measurement equivalence over gender and life stage. Sociological Research Online.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cooper, C., Bebbington, P., King, M., Jenkins, R., Farrell, M., Brugha, T., et al. (2011). Happiness across age groups: results from the 2007 National Psychiatric Morbidity Survey. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 26(6), 608–614. doi: 10.1002/gps.2570.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well-being, social capital and public policy: What’s new? The Economic Journal, 116(510), C34–C45. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01074.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Webb, E., Blane, D., McMunn, A., & Netuveli, G. (2011). Proximal predictors of change in quality of life at older ages. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 65(6), 542–547. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.101758.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Martinez-Martin, P., Prieto-Flores, M.-E., Forjaz, M. J., Fernandez-Mayoralas, G., Rojo-Perez, F., Rojo, J.-M., et al. (2012). Components and determinants of quality of life in community-dwelling older adults. European Journal of Ageing, 9(3), 255–263. doi: 10.1007/s10433-012-0232-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    National Institute on Aging. (2007). Growing Old in America: The Heath and Retirement Study (HRS Databook). Bethesda: National Institute on Aging.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Steptoe, A., Breeze, E., Banks, J., & Nazroo, J. (2012). Cohort Profile: The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). International Journal of Epidemiology. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys168.
  25. 25.
    Cheshire, H., Cox, K., Lessof, C., & Taylor, R. (2006). Methodology. In J. Banks, E. Breeze, C. Lessof, & J. Nazroo (Eds.), Retirement, health and relationships of the older population in England: The 2004 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (Wave 2) (pp. 367–383). London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(4), 71–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152. doi: 10.1080/17439760701756946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wiggins, R. D., Netuveli, G., Hyde, M., Higgs, P., & Blane, D. (2007). The evaluation of a self-enumerated scale of quality of life (CASP-19) in the context of research on ageing: A combination of exploratory and confirmatory approaches. Social Indicators Research, 89(1), 61–77. doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9220-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Higgs, P., Hyde, M., Wiggins, R., & Blane, D. (2003). Researching quality of life in early Old age: The importance of the sociological dimension. Social Policy & Administration, 37(3), 239–252. doi: 10.1111/1467-9515.00336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Longitudinal StudiesInstitute of EducationLondonUK
  2. 2.Sociology and the Cathie Marsh Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations