Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 23, Issue 7, pp 2031–2035 | Cite as

Comparing PROMIS computer-adaptive tests to the Brief Symptom Inventory in patients with prostate cancer

  • George Baum
  • Karen Basen-Engquist
  • Maria C. Swartz
  • Patricia A. Parker
  • Cindy L. Carmack
Brief Communication

Abstract

Purpose

This study assessed whether the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer-adaptive tests (CATs) provided results similar to those of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) with a low patient burden.

Methods

Secondary data analysis of 136 prostate cancer patients who completed the 53-item BSI and the PROMIS CATs assessing depression, anxiety, and hostility.

Results

The PROMIS CATs and BSI correlated significantly in measures of depression (.85), anxiety (.76), and anger/hostility (.66; p < .001 for all). Using our BSI cutoff points for depression, anxiety, and anger/hostility, ROC analysis yielded areas under the curve of .966 [standard error (SE) = .014, p < .001], .975 (SE = .012, p < .001), and .952 (SE = .027, p < .001), respectively.

Conclusions

PROMIS CATs were highly correlated with the BSI subscales, indicating that the CATs performed well compared with the BSI, a widely used psychosocial measure.

Keywords

Computer-adaptive tests BSI Brief Symptom Inventory Prostate cancer Quality of life PROMIS Health surveys 

Abbreviations

PRO

Patient-reported outcome

CAT

Computer-adaptive test

QOL

Quality of life

NIH

National Institutes of Health

PROMIS

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System

BSI

Brief Symptom Inventory

ROC

Receiver operating characteristic curve

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study is supported in part by the Patient-Reported Outcomes, Survey, and Population Research (PROSPR) Shared Resource; the Cancer Center Support Grant CA16672, given to The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center by the National Institutes of Health; and 5R21CA126854-02, given to Cindy L. Carmack by the National Cancer Institute.

References

  1. 1.
    American Cancer Society. (2012). Cancer facts and figures 2012. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    da Silva, F. C., et al. (1993). Quality of life in patients with prostatic cancer. A feasibility study. The Members of Quality of Life Committee of the EORTC Genitourinary Group. Cancer, 71(3 Suppl), 1138–1142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kornblith, A. (1998). Psychosocial adaptation of cancer survivors. Psycho-oncology, 1, 223–254.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eton, D. T., & Lepore, S. J. (2002). Prostate cancer and health-related quality of life: A review of the literature. Psycho-oncology, 11(4), 307–326.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    National Institutes of Health. (2013). PROMIS: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Current Programs 2013 [cited 2014 January 4th]; https://commonfund.nih.gov/promis/overview.
  6. 6.
    Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Cella, D. (2005). The promise of PROMIS: Using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23(5 Suppl 39), S53–S57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reeve, B. B., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S22–S31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fliege, H., et al. (2005). Development of a computer-adaptive test for depression (D-CAT). Quality of Life Research, 14(10), 2277–2291.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheville, A. L., et al. (2012). Performance of an item response theory-based computer adaptive test in identifying functional decline. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(7), 1153–1160.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carle, A. C., et al. (2011). Advancing PROMIS’s methodology: Results of the Third Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Psychometric Summit. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 11(6), 677–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gershon, R. C., et al. (2010). The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11(3), 304.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rothrock, N. E., et al. (2010). Relative to the general US population, chronic diseases are associated with poorer health-related quality of life as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1195–1204.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13(3), 595–605.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Herr, H. W., Kornblith, A. B., & Ofman, U. (1993). A comparison of the quality of life of patients with metastatic prostate cancer who received or did not receive hormonal therapy. Cancer, 71(3 Suppl), 1143–1150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carmack Taylor, C. L., et al. (2007). A social comparison theory analysis of group composition and efficacy of cancer support group programs. Social Science and Medicine, 65(2), 262–273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Derogatis, L. R. (1993). BSI, Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, scoring and procedures manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pilkonis, P. A., et al. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(R)): Depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment, 18(3), 263–283.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cella, D., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weiss, D. J. (1985). Adaptive testing by computer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(6), 774.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yost, K. J., et al. (2011). Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(5), 507–516.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khanna, D., et al. (2011). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(R))—The future of measuring patient reported outcomes in rheumatology. Arthritis Care and Research, 63(S11), S486–S490.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khanna, D., et al. (2012). Feasibility and construct validity of PROMIS and “legacy” instruments in an academic scleroderma clinic. Value Health, 15(1), 128–134.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Spiegel, B. M., et al. (2011). Understanding gastrointestinal distress: A framework for clinical practice. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 106(3), 380–385.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Baum
    • 1
  • Karen Basen-Engquist
    • 1
  • Maria C. Swartz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Patricia A. Parker
    • 1
  • Cindy L. Carmack
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Behavioral ScienceThe University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA
  2. 2.The University of Texas School of Public Health at HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations