Identifying vulnerability in grief: psychometric properties of the Adult Attitude to Grief Scale
- 935 Downloads
Purpose Grief is a reaction to a significant loss that can profoundly affect all aspects of life and capacity to function well. The consequences can vary from severe psychological distress through to physical disturbances and significant social problems. This study sought to identify a measure of vulnerability in grief, by examining the psychometric properties of the Adult Attitude to Grief (AAG) scale in a sample of 168 people seeking help in their bereavement.
Methods The factor structure of the scale, its internal consistency, its construct validity and optimum classification cutoffs were tested.
Results Confirmatory factor analysis broadly supported the factor structure of the AAG, but identified one item that could profitably be reworded. Internal consistency of the three subscales was acceptable. Construct validity and discriminative validity were supported by correlations with allied constructs (depression and anxiety) and a significant difference between scores for clients with Prolonged Grief Disorder and those without. A correlation with counsellors’ own clinical ratings of vulnerability demonstrated criterion-related validity of the AAG. Using receiver operating characteristic methods, optimum cutoff scores on the scale were identified for the classification of different levels of vulnerability.
Conclusion The AAG was found to be a psychometrically promising tool for identifying vulnerability in grief.
KeywordsAdult Attitude to Grief scale Vulnerability Psychometrics Validity Reliability Factor analysis
List of symbols
Adult Attitude to Grief scale
Comparative fit index
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment 7
Prolonged Grief Disorder Scale
Prolonged grief disorder
Patient Health Questionnaire 9
Root means square error of approximation
Receiver operating characteristic
Weighed least squares mean and variance adjusted
This study was funded by the North Staffordshire Medical Institute. The authors wish to thank the Dove Service (North Staffordshire, UK), St Giles Hospice (Lichfield, UK) and the Marie Curie Hospices (Belfast and Hampstead, UK) for their help with data collection, Aisling Bartlam for help with data entry, and Kelvin Jordan for advice on the manuscript.
- 1.Office for National Statistics (2012). Births and deaths in England and Wales 2011. London: Office for National Statistics www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/Product.asp?vlnk=14409.
- 2.Prigerson, H. G., & Jacobs, S. C. (2001). Traumatic grief as a distinct disorder: A rationale, consensus criteria, and a preliminary empirical test. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, W. Stroebe, & H. Schut (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: consequences, coping and care (pp. 613–645). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.House of Lords (2013). Select committee on public service and demographic change—first report: Ready for ageing? http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldpublic/140/14002.htm.
- 6.Prigerson, H. G., & Maciejewski, P. K. (2006). A call for sound empirical testing and evaluation of criteria for complicated grief proposed by the DSM V. Omega, 52, 9–19.Google Scholar
- 7.Prigerson, H. G., Horowitz, M. J., Jacobs, S. C., Parkes, C. M., Aslan, M., Goodkin, K., et al. (2009). Prolonged Grief Disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSMV and ICD-11. PLoS Medicine, 6(8), e1000121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Machin, L. (2001). Exploring a framework for understanding the range of response to loss; a study of clients receiving bereavement counselling. Unpublished PhD thesis: Keele University, UK.Google Scholar
- 9.Machin, L. (1980) Living with Loss. Research Report for the Lichfield Diocesan Board for Social Responsibility (unpublished).Google Scholar
- 10.Machin, L. (2009). Working with loss and grief: A new model for practitioners. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- 11.Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- 12.Horowitz, M. J. (1997). Stress response syndromes, PTSD, grief, and adjustment disorders (3rd ed.). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
- 14.Martin, T. L., & Doka, K. L. (2000). Men don’t cry…women do: Transcending gender stereotypes of grief. Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
- 15.Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (1998). The relationship between adult attachment styles and emotional and cognitive reactions to stressful events. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 143–165). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- 16.Seligman, M. E. P. (1998). Building human strength: Psychology’s forgotten mission. American Psychological Association Monitor, 29, 1.Google Scholar
- 19.Machin, L. (2007). The Adult Attitude to Grief Scale as a tool of practice for counsellors working with bereaved people. Report sponsored by Age Concern, Tameside and Keele University.Google Scholar
- 21.Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 24.Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modeling. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. J. McCardle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: a festschrift to Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275–340). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 25.Blunch, N. J. (2008). Introduction to structural equation modelling using SPSS and AMOS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- 26.Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications and programming. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 28.Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- 30.Kline, P. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 31.Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- 34.Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (1997). Psychological testing: principles, applications and issues (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
- 35.DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- 37.Kroenke, K., & Spitzer, R. L. (2002). The PHQ-9: A new depression and diagnostic severity measure. Psychiatric Annals, 32, 509–521.Google Scholar
- 42.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar