The mediating role of disability and social support in the association between low vision and depressive symptoms in older adults
Vision loss is highly prevalent in old age and has a substantial impact on different aspects of quality of life including depressive symptoms. Our objective was to examine the mediating role of disability and social support in the association between low vision and depressive symptoms.
Differences in disability, social support, and depressive symptoms between 148 persons with low vision and a reference population (N = 4,792) all ≥57 years were compared. The association between low vision and depressive symptoms and the mediating role of disability and social support was examined by the means of regression.
A significant effect of low vision on depressive symptoms was identified even after the adjustment for disability and social support (standardized beta 0.053, P < 0.001). The association between low vision and symptoms of depression was partially mediated by disability, while social support was identified as a suppressor variable. Low vision, disability, and social support showed unique contributions to depressive symptoms.
Prevention of disability and the increase in social support may help to reduce symptoms of depression in older adults with low vision. By taking such information into account in their intervention work, health professionals working in this area may improve their care quality.
KeywordsLow vision Depression Social support Disability
We thank the collaborating organizations for low-vision care in the Netherlands, i.e., Bartiméus and Royal Dutch Visio. The Centre for Data and Information Management of Maastricht University (MEMIC), J. Ballemans, B. Franssen, and R. Handels are acknowledged for assistance in the data collection. This study was funded by ZonMw—The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, Program In Sight (Grant 94305004).
- 2.Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics. (2012). Older Americans 2012: Key indicators of well-being. Washington, DC: US, Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- 9.Kempen, G. I. J. M., Ballemans, J., Ranchor, A. V., Van Rens, G. H. M. B., & Zijlstra, G. A. R. (2012). The impact of low vision on activities of daily living, symptoms of depression, feelings of anxiety and social support in community-living older adults seeking vision rehabilitation services. Quality of Life Research, 21, 1405–1411.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Williamson, G. M., & Christie, J. (2009). Aging well in the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 165–169). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 12.Williamson, G. M., & Shaffer, D. R. (2000). The activity restriction model of depressed affect: Antecedents and consequences of restricted normal activities. In G. M. Williamson, D. R. Shaffer, & P. A. Parmelee (Eds.), Physical illness and depression in older adults: A handbook of theory, research, and practice (pp. 173–200). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- 14.Zijlstra, G. A. R., Van Rens, G. H. M. B., Scherder, E. J. A., Brouwer, D. M., Van der Velde, J., Verstraten, P. F. J., et al. (2009). Effects and feasibility of a standardised orientation and mobility training in using an identification cane for older adults with low vision: Design of a randomised trial. BMC Health Services Research, 9, 153.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- 20.Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., & Muller, K. E. (1988). Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Boston, MA: PWS Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- 23.Liu, C. J., Brost, M. A., Horton, V. E., Kenyon, S. B., & Mears, K. E. (2013). Occupational therapy interventions to improve performance of daily activities at home for older adults with low vision: A systematic review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 279–287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar