Quality of Life Research

, Volume 22, Issue 7, pp 1647–1654 | Cite as

Physical activity and quality of life in older adults: an 18-month panel analysis

  • Siobhan M. Phillips
  • Thomas R. Wójcicki
  • Edward McAuley
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Although physical activity has been associated with quality of life (QOL), the empirical evidence regarding the mechanisms underlying this relationship is limited. In the present study, we examined the mediating roles played by self-efficacy and health status in the physical activity–QOL relationship from baseline to 18-month follow-up in a sample of community-dwelling older adults.

Methods

Community-dwelling adults (N = 321, M age = 63.8 years) were recruited to participate in a cross-sectional study and were later contacted to participate in an 18-month follow-up. Individuals completed a battery of questionnaires assessing physical activity, self-efficacy, physical self-worth, disability limitations, and quality of life. A panel analysis within a covariance modeling framework was used to analyze the data.

Results

Overall, the model was a good fit to the data (χ2 = 61.00, df = 29, p < 0.001, standardized root mean residual = 0.05, Comparative Fit Index = 0.97) with changes in physical activity indirectly influencing change in life satisfaction from baseline to 18 months via changes in exercise self-efficacy, physical self-worth, and disability limitations independent of baseline relationships and demographic factors. Specifically, increases in physical activity were associated with increases in exercise self-efficacy which, in turn, was associated with higher physical self-worth and fewer disability limitations which were associated with greater life satisfaction.

Conclusions

The findings from this study suggest the relationship between physical activity and global QOL in older adults may be mediated by more proximal modifiable outcomes that can be targeted in physical activity programs and interventions.

Keywords

Physical activity Quality of life Self-efficacy Older adults 

References

  1. 1.
    U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). Table 2: Projections of the population. National population projections, 2008. http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/summarytables.html.
  2. 2.
    Nelson, M. E., Rejeski, W. J., Blair, S. N., Duncan, P. W., Judge, J. O., King, A. C., et al. (2007). Physical activity and public health in older adults: Recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation, 116, 1094–1105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chodzko-Zajko, W. J., Proctor, D. N., Fiatarone Singh, M. A., Minson, C. T., Nigg, C. R., Salem, G. J., et al. (2009). American College of sports medicine position stand. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 30, 992–1008.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McAuley, E., Konopack, J. F., Motl, R. W., Morris, K. S., Doerksen, S. E., & Rosengren, K. R. (2006). Physical activity and quality of life in older adults: influence of health status and self-efficacy. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 99–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rejeski, W. J., & Mihalko, S. L. (2001). Physical activity and quality of life in older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences., 277, 64–66.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tarlov, A. R., Ware, J. E., Greenfield, S., Nelson, E. C., Perrin, E., & Zubkoff, M. (1989). The medical outcomes study: An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 262(7), 925–930.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Trine, M. (1999). Physical activity and quality of life. In J. Rippe (Ed.), Lifestyle medicine (pp. 989–997). Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stewart, A., & King, A. (1991). Evaluating the efficacy of physical activity for influencing quality of life outcomes in older adults. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 13(3), 108–116.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McAuley, E., Doerksen, S. E., Morris, K. S., Motl, R. W., Hu, L., Wójcicki, T. R., et al. (2008). Pathways from physical activity to quality of life in older women. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 36, 13–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Motl, R. W., McAuley, E., Snook, E. M., & Gliottoni, R. C. (2009). Physical activity and quality of life in multiple sclerosis: Intermediary roles of disability, fatigue, mood, pain, self-efficacy and social support. Psychology Health Medicine, 14, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    White, S. M., Wójcicki, T. R., & McAuley, E. (2009). Physical activity and quality of life in community dwelling older adults. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-7-10.
  13. 13.
    Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 653–663.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lachman, M., Weaver, S., Bandura, M., Elliott, E., & Lewkowicz, C. (1992). Improving memory and control beliefs through cognitive restructuring and self-generated strategies. Journal of Gerontology, 47, 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wójcicki, T. R., White, S. M., & McAuley, E. (2009). Assessing outcome expectations in older adults: The multidimensional outcome expectations for exercise scale. The Journals of Gerontology Series B:Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences., 64, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Washburn, R. A., Smith, K. W., Jette, A. M., & Janney, C. A. (1993). The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): Development and evaluation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 153–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Washburn, R. A., & Ficker, J. L. (1999). Does participation in a structured high-intensity exercise program influence daily physical activity patterns in older adults? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70, 201–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Washburn, R. A., McAuley, E., Katula, J., Mihalko, S. L., & Boileau, R. A. (1999). The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): Evidence for validity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52, 643–651.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McAuley, E. (1993). Self-efficacy and the maintenance of exercise participation in older adults. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 103–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McAuley, E., Konopack, J. F., Motl, R. W., Rosengren, K., & Morris, K. S. (2005). Measuring disability and function in older women: Psychometric properties of the late-life function and disability instrument. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 60, 901–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fox, K. R., & Corbin, C. B. (1989). The physical self-perception profile: Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 11, 408–430.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Elavsky, S., McAuley, E., Motl, R. W., Konopack, J. F., Marquez, D. X., Hu, L., et al. (2005). Physical activity enhances long-term quality of life in older adults: Efficacy, esteem, and affective influences. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 138–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    IBM. (1989–2010). SPSS statistics (version 19.0). Chicago, IL: IBM.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2011). Mplus (version 6.0). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Arbukle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulide & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243–278). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Enders, C., & Bandalos, D. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 430–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Enders, C. K. (2001). The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data. Psychological Methods, 6, 352–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kessler, R. C., & Greenberg, D. F. (1981). Linear panel analysis: Models of quantitative change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    McAuley, E., Morris, K. S., Motl, R. W., Hu, L., Konopack, J. F., & Elavsky, S. (2007). Long-term follow-up of physical activity behavior in older adults. Health Psychology, 26, 375–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McAuley, E., Jerome, G. J., Elavsky, S., Marquez, D. X., & Ramsey, S. N. (2003). Predicting long-term maintenance of physical activity in older adults. Preventive Medicine, 37, 110–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior., 31, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science and Medicine, 66, 1733–1749.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mroczek, D. K., & Spiro, A. (2005). Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: Findings from the veterans affairs normative aging study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 189–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Deaton, A. (2010). A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(22), 9985–9990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Palgi, Y., & Shmotkin, D. (2010). The predicament of time near the end of life: Time perspective trajectories of life satisfaction among the old–old. Aging & Mental Health, 14(5), 577–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Thomas, P. A. (2011). Gender, social engagement, and limitations in late life. Social Science and Medicine, 73(9), 1428–1435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Meeks, S., & Murrell, S. A. (2001). Contribution of education to health and life satisfaction in older adults mediated by negative affect. Journal of Aging and Health, 13(1), 92–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). Physical activity resources for health professionals. http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/professionals/data/index.html.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siobhan M. Phillips
    • 1
    • 2
  • Thomas R. Wójcicki
    • 1
  • Edward McAuley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Kinesiology and Community HealthUniversity of Illinois Urbana ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Center for Cancer Training, National Cancer InstituteBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations