Functional status, life-space mobility, and quality of life: a longitudinal mediation analysis
- 881 Downloads
Using the Wilson–Cleary model of patient outcomes as a conceptual framework, the impact of functional status on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among older adults was examined, including tests of the mediation provided by life-space mobility.
Participants were enrollees in a population-based, longitudinal study of mobility among community-dwelling older adults. Data from four waves of the study equally spaced approximately 18 months apart (baseline, 18, 36, and 54 months) were used for participants who survived at least 1 year beyond the 54-month assessment (n = 677). Autoregressive mediation models using longitudinal data and cross-sectional mediation models using baseline data were evaluated and compared using structural equation modeling.
The longitudinal autoregressive models supported the mediating role of life-space mobility and suggested that this effect is larger for the mental component summary score than the physical component summary score of the SF-12. Evidence for a reciprocal relationship over time between functional status, measured by ADL difficulty, and life-space mobility was suggested by modification indices; these model elaborations did not alter the substantive meaning of the mediation effects. Mediated effect estimates from longitudinal autoregressive models were generally larger than those from cross-sectional models, suggesting that mediating relationships would have been missed or were potentially underestimated in cross-sectional models.
These results support a mediating role for life-space mobility in the relationship between functional status and HRQoL. Functional status limitations might cause diminished HRQoL in part by limiting mobility. Mobility limitations may precede functional status limitations in addition to being a consequence thereof.
KeywordsWilson–Cleary model Activities of daily living Mobility SF-12 Longitudinal mediation Autoregressive mediation modeling
- 4.Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (2002). SF-12: How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales (4th ed.). Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.Google Scholar
- 14.Schulz, T., Niesing, J., Stewart, R. E., Westerhuis, R., Hagedoorn, M., Ploeg, R. J., et al. (2012). The role of personal characteristics in the relationship between health and psychological distress among kidney transplant recipients. Social Science & Medicine. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.028 [Epub ahead of print].
- 20.MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Longitudinal mediation analysis. In D. P. MacKinnon (Ed.), Introduction to statistical mediation analysis (pp. 193–236). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- 25.Roth, D. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2012). Mediation analysis with longitudinal data. In J. T. Newsom, R. N. Jones, & S. M. Hofer (Eds.), Longitudinal data analysis: A practical guide for researchers in aging, health, and social sciences (pp. 181–216). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 33.Ritchie, C., Locher, J., Roth, D., McVie, T., Sawyer, P., & Allman, R. (2008). Unintentional weight loss predicts decline in activities of daily living function and life-space mobility over 4 years among community-dwelling older adults. Journal of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 63(1), 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Hoyle, R. H., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). Sample size, reliability, and tests of statistical mediation. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 195–222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- 37.MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- 40.Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S. (1991). Interpreting and estimating indirect effects assuming time lags really matter. In L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 243–259). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- 46.Yu, C. Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- 48.Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Weighted least squares estimation with missing data. http://www.statmodel.com/download/GstrucMissingRevision.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2011.
- 49.Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th edn). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- 50.Millsap, R. E. (2005). Four unresolved problems in studies of factorial invariance. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift to Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 153–171). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- 51.Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar