Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 377–380 | Cite as

Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research

  • Ann C. Klassen
  • John Creswell
  • Vicki L. Plano Clark
  • Katherine Clegg Smith
  • Helen I. Meissner
Commentary

Introduction

There is a growing priority in all areas of health research to develop new methodologies to improve the quality and scientific power of data, and this is leading to an extraordinary surge in methodological diversity. This diversity reflects the nature of the problems facing health sciences and health care delivery, such as disparities among populations, age groups, ethnicities, and cultures; poor adherence to recommended treatments; behavioral risk factors contributing to disability and health; and the translation of research findings into applied settings. The diversity in methodology also signals a growing acceptance of behavioral and social science perspectives in clinical research, the formation of interdisciplinary research teams, and use of multi-faceted approaches. Such approaches are important to investigations of complex health problems, which call for incorporating patient and family point of view, and cultural models of illness and health.

Contributing to this...

Keywords

Mixed Method Mixed Method Study Mixed Method Approach Mixed Method Research Mixed Method Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Plano Clark, V. L. (2010). The adoption and practice of mixed methods: U. S. trends in federally funded health-related research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 428–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Curry, L. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation, 119, 1442–1452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Almarsdottir, A. B., & Traulsen, N. M. (2009). Multimethod research into policy changes in the pharmacy sector—the Nordic case. Research Social Administrative Pharmacy, 5(1), 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stange, K. C., Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (2006). Publishing multimethod research. Annals of Family Medicine, 4, 292–294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilkins, K., & Woodgate, R. (2008). Designing a mixed methods study in pediatric oncology nursing research. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 25(1), 24–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Creswell, J. W., & Zhang, W. (2009). The application of mixed methods designs to trauma research. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(6), 612–621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Chamberlain, P., Hurlburt, M. S., & Landsverk, J. (2011). Mixed-methods designs in mental health services research: A review. Psychiatric Services, 62(3), 255–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mertens, D. M. (2009). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klassen, A. C., Smith, K. C., Black, M. M., & Caulfield, L. E. (2009). Mixed method approaches to understanding cancer-related dietary risk reduction among public housing residents. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 86(4), 624–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McVea, K., Crabtree, B. F., Medder, J. D., Susman, J. L., Lukas, L., McIlvain, H. E., et al. (1996). An ounce of prevention? Evaluation of the ‘put prevention into practice’ program. Journal of Family Practice, 43(4), 73–81.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pasick, R. J., Burke, N. J., Barker, J. C., Galen, J., Bird, J. A., Otero-Sabogal, R., et al. (2009). Behavioral theory in a diverse society: Like a compass on Mars. Health Education Behavior, 36(5), 11S–35S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ring, L., Gross, C. R., & McColl, E. (2010). Putting the text back into context: Toward increased use of mixed methods for quality of life research. Quality of Life Research, 19, 613–615.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morse, J., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann C. Klassen
    • 1
  • John Creswell
    • 2
  • Vicki L. Plano Clark
    • 3
  • Katherine Clegg Smith
    • 4
  • Helen I. Meissner
    • 5
  1. 1.Drexel University School of Public HealthPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.John University of NebraskaLincolnUSA
  3. 3.University of NebraskaLincolnUSA
  4. 4.Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  5. 5.Office of Behavioral and Social Science Research National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations