PROMIS Pediatric Anger Scale: an item response theory analysis
- 543 Downloads
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) aims to develop patient-reported outcome (PROs) instruments for use in clinical research. The PROMIS pediatrics (ages 8–17) project focuses on the development of PROs across several health domains (physical function, pain, fatigue, emotional distress, social role relationships, and asthma symptoms). The objective of the present study was to report on the psychometric properties of the PROMIS Pediatric Anger Scale.
Participants (n = 759) were recruited from public school settings, hospital-based outpatient, and subspecialty pediatrics clinics. The anger items (k = 10) were administered on one test form. A hierarchical confirmatory factor analytic model (CFA) was conducted to evaluate scale dimensionality and local dependence. Item response theory (IRT) analyses were then used to finalize the item scale and short form.
CFA confirmed that the anger items are representative of a unidimensional scale, and items with local dependence were removed, resulting in a six-item short form. The IRT-scaled scores from summed scores and each score’s conditional standard error were calculated for the new six-item PROMIS Pediatric Anger Scale.
This study provides initial calibrations of the anger items and creates the PROMIS Pediatric Anger Scale, version 1.0
KeywordsPROMIS Anger HRQOL PRO Scale development Surveys Pediatrics
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™
Health-related quality of life
Confirmatory factor analysis
Item response theory
Differential item function
We would like to acknowledge the contribution of Harry A. Guess, MD, PhD to the conceptualization and operationalization of this research prior to his death. This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health through the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, Grant 1U01AR052181-01, and by SBIR contract HHSN-2612007-00013C with the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health. Information on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) can be found at http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/ and http://www.nihpromis.org.
- 2.Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life items banks: Plans for the patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22–S31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/child-and-adolescent-mental-health/index.shtml last accessed Oct. 5, 2009.
- 5.Tangney, J. P., Hill-Barlow, D., Wagner, P. E., Marschall, D. E., Borenstein, J. K., Sanftner, J., et al. (1996). Assessing individual difference in constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 780–796.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Irwin, D. E., Varni, J. W., Yeatts, K., & DeWalt, D. (2009). Cognitive interviewing methodology in the development of a pediatric item bank: A patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7(3), 1–10.Google Scholar
- 12.Muthén, B., du Toit, S. H. C., Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squared and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén, Unpublished technical report.Google Scholar
- 13.Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2004). Mplus user’s guide (2nd ed.). Los Angeles CA: Muthen & Muthen (Ed.).Google Scholar
- 14.Hill, C. D., Edwards, M. C., Thissen, D., Langer, M. M., Wirth, R. J., Burwinkle, T. M., et al. (2007). Practical issues in the application of item response theory: A demonstration using items from the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) 4.0 generic core scales. Medical Care, 45, S39–S47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores, Psychometrika Monograph. No. 17.Google Scholar
- 16.Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85–100). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- 17.du Toit, M. (Ed.). (2003). IRT from SSI. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
- 20.Bjorner, J. B., Smith, K. J., Edelen, M. O., Stone, C., Thissen, D., & Sun, X. (2007). IRTFIT: A macro for item fit and local dependence tests under IRT models. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.Google Scholar
- 21.Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Wainer, H. (1993). Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 67–113). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- 22.Thissen, D. (2001). IRTLRDIF: Software for the computation of the statistics involved in item response theory likelihood-ratio tests for differential item functioning. Chapel Hill, NC: L.L. Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
- 23.Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 57, 289–300.Google Scholar
- 24.Williams, V. S. L., Jones, L. V., & Tukey, J. W. (1999). Controlling error in multiple comparisons, with examples from state-to-state differences in educational achievement. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 42–69.Google Scholar
- 27.Thissen, D., Nelson, L., Rosa, K., & McLeod, L. D. (2001). Item response theory for items scored in more than two categories. In D. Thissen & H. Wainer (Eds.), Test Scoring (pp. 141–186). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- 29.Chen, W. H., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indices for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265–289.Google Scholar
- 36.Watson, D., Clark, L. A., Weber, K., Assenheimer, J. S., Strauss, M. E., & McCormick, R. A. (1995). Testing a tripartite model: II. Exploring the symptom structure of anxiety and depression in student, adult, and patient samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 15–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Pilkonis, PA, Reise SP, Stover AM, Riley WT, Cella D, (2010) Items Banks for Measuring Emotional Distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Depression, Anxiety, and Anger. Manuscript in process.Google Scholar
- 43.Beck, J. S., Beck, A. T., & Jolly, J. (2001). Manual for the Beck youth inventories of emotional & social impairment. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- 44.Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children Youth and Families.Google Scholar
- 45.DeWitt EM, Stucky BD, Thissen D, Irwin DE, Varni JW, Lai JS, Yeatts KB, DeWalt DA. (in press) Construction of PROMIS Pediatric Physical Function Scales: Built using Item Response Theory. J Clin Epi.Google Scholar