Quality and acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures used in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME): a systematic review
- 982 Downloads
To review the quality and acceptability of condition-specific, domain-specific and generic multi-item patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in the assessment of adults with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME).
Systematic literature searches were made to identify PROMs. Quality and acceptability was assessed against an appraisal framework, which captured evidence of both the thoroughness and results of evaluations: evidence of measurement (reliability, validity, responsiveness, interpretability, data quality/precision) and practical properties (feasibility, patient acceptability), and the extent of active patient involvement was sought.
A total of 11 CFS/ME-specific, 55 domain-specific and 11 generic measures were reviewed. With the exception of the generic SF-36, all measures had mostly limited evidence of measurement and/or practical properties. Patient involvement was poorly reported and often cursory.
The quality and acceptability of reviewed PROMs is limited, and recommendations for patient-reported assessment are difficult. Significant methodological and quality issues in PROM development/evaluation were identified by the appraisal framework, which must be addressed in future research. Clear discrepancies exist between what is measured in research and how patients define their experience of CFS/ME. Future PROM development/evaluation must seek to involve patients more collaboratively to measure outcomes of importance using relevant and credible methods of assessment.
KeywordsChronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis Patient-reported outcome Review
Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis
Patient-reported outcome measures
The authors would like to thank Jacoby Peterson (JP) for her contribution to the data extraction. GUS Charitable Trust to support research associated with the PRIME initiative (Partnership for Research in ME/CFS http://prime-cfs.org/).
Conflict of interest
- 1.Department of Health. (2002). Report of the CFS/ME working group. Para.1.4.2, p6. Accessed 2 March 2009 http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4064840.
- 2.Bibby, J., & Kershaw, A. (2006). How much is M.E. costing the country? Report prepared by the survey & Statistical Research Centre. Sheffield, England: Sheffield Hallam University.Google Scholar
- 4.Liberating the NHS: legislative framework and next steps. (2010). UK Department of Health. Accessed 4 April 2011. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/@ps/documents/digitalasset/dh_122707.pdf.
- 5.Staley, K. (2009). Exploring impact: Public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE. Accessed 4 April 2011. http://www.invo.org.uk/pdfs/Involve_Exploring_Impactfinal28.10.09.pdf.
- 6.Staniszewska, S., Crowe, S., Badenoch, D., Edwards, C., Savage, J., & Norman, W. (2010). The PRIME project: Developing a patient evidence-base. Health Expectations, 3, 312–322.Google Scholar
- 8.Fitzpatrick, R., Davey, C., Buxton, M. J., & Jones, D. R. (1998). Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment, 2(14).Google Scholar
- 13.Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. Third edition. McGraw-Hill Series in Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.Google Scholar
- 15.Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Health Measurement Scales. A practical guide to their development and use (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications Inc.Google Scholar
- 16.McDowell, I. (2006). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 17.US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labelling claims. Accessed 4 April 2011. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf.
- 21.Smith, S., Cano, S., Lamping, D., et al. (2005). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for routine use in treatment centres: recommendations based on a review of the scientific evidence. Final report to the Department of Health. Accessed 4 April 2011. http://www.wmqi.westmidlands.nhs.uk/downloads/file/PROMS%20Final%20report%20Dec%2005.pdf.
- 23.Buckland, S., Hayes, H., Ostrer, C., et al. (2007). Public information pack (PIP) how to get actively involved in NHS, public health and social care research. So what is it all about? Eastleigh: INVOLVE. Accessed 4 April 2011. http://www.invo.org.uk/pdfs/PIP1whatisitallabout.pdf.
- 27.Wagner, D., Nisenbaum, R., Heim, C., Jones, J. F., Unger, E. R., & Reeves, W. C. (2005). Psychometric properties of the CDC Symptom Inventory for assessment of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Population Health Metrics, 3, 8. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-3-8.
- 36.Heijmans, M. J. (1998). Coping and adaptive outcome in chronic fatigue syndrome: importance of illness cognitions. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 45(1 Spec No).Google Scholar
- 38.Wagner, D., Nisenbaum, R., et al. (2005) Psychometric properties of the CDC Symptom Inventory for assessment of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Population Health Metrics.Google Scholar
- 40.Cox, D. (2002). Chronic fatigue syndrome: An evaluation of an occupational therapy inpatient intervention. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(10), 461–468.Google Scholar
- 42.Nijs, J., van Eupen, I., Vandecauter, J., Augustinus, E., Bleyen, G., Moorkens, G., et al. (2009). Can pacing self-management alter physical behavior and symptom severity in chronic fatigue syndrome? A case series. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 46(7), 985–996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Spielberger, C., Jacobs, G., Russell, S., & Crane, R. (1983). The Assessment of anger: The State-Trait Anger Scale. In J. N. Butcherem & C. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (pp. 159–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- 46.Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Test manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Pyschologists Press.Google Scholar
- 50.Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. London: Oxford University Press (Maudsley Monograph no.21).Google Scholar
- 52.Derogatis, L. R., Rickels, K., & Rock, A. (1977). SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring and procedures manual, I. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research.Google Scholar
- 56.Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Manual of the ways of coping questionnaire. Palo Alta, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- 57.Schreurs, P. J. G., van der Willige, G., Tellegen, B., & Brosschot, J. F. (1993). The Utrecht coping list-manual. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
- 62.McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., & Dropplemann, L. F. (1992). EdITS manual for the profile of mood states (POMS). San Diego, CA: EdITS/Educational and Industrial Testing Services.Google Scholar
- 65.Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image. Revised Edition. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
- 70.Fix, A. J., & Daughton, D. (1988). Human activity profile professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
- 71.Fries, J. F., Cella, D., Rose, M., Krishnan, E., & Bruce, B. (2009). Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. The Journal of Rheumatology, 36(9):2061–2066. Accessed 4 April 2011 http://aramis.stanford.edu/downloads/PROMIS%20HAQ%20-%202007.pdf.Google Scholar
- 83.Cleeland, C. S., & Ryan, K. M. (1994). Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory. Annals Academy of Medicine, 23(2), 129–138.Google Scholar
- 88.Meijman, T., & de Vries-Griever, A. (1985). The construction and evaluation of a one-dimensional scale measuring subjective sleep quality. Heijmans bulletins psychologische instituten. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
- 89.Cesta, A., Moldofsky, H., & Sammut, C. (1996). The University of Toronto Sleep Assessment Questionnaire. Sleep Research, 25, 486.Google Scholar
- 91.Lee, K. A. (1991). Fatigue in employed childbearing women. In Proceedings of the international nursing research conference (p. 432). Los Angeles, CA: American Nurses Association.Google Scholar
- 101.Ware, J. E. (1997). SF-36 health survey. Manual and interpretation guide, 2nd edn. The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, Boston, MA, Nimrod Press.Google Scholar
- 107.Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Dewey, J. E. (2000). How to score version two of the SF-36 Health Survey (standard and acute forms). Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Inc.Google Scholar
- 110.WHOQoL Group. (1996). World Health Organisation Quality of Life—Brief Form (WHOQoL-BREF). Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
- 119.Staniszewska, S., Haywood, K. L., Brett, J., & Tutton, E. (2011). Patient and public involvement in PROMS: Evolution not revolution. The Patient (in press).Google Scholar
- 121.NICE Guideline (Consultation). Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy): diagnosis and management of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy) in adults and children. Draft for Consultation. September 2006. National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care. Accessed 4 April 2011. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp?action=download&r=true&o=34187.
- 122.Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19, 539–549.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar