Choice of recall period for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: criteria for consideration
- 519 Downloads
Understand the choice of recall period for PRO measures based on intended use, characteristics of the disease, treatment, and attributes of studies.
Current practice and considerations were reviewed within several disease areas (overactive bladder, menopausal hot flashes, niacin-induced flushing, osteoarthritis pain, irritable bowel symptoms, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and alopecia).
Rationales were identified for using different recall periods, including event-driven (immediate), daily, up to weekly, and longer than weekly. This work demonstrates that (1) recall depends on what the PRO measure captures, its intended use, and attributes of the disease and study; (2) within the same disease area, recall can vary depending on the concept or phenomenon of interest; (3) recall must consider patient burden and their ability to easily and accurately recall the information requested; and (4) recall must be consistent with the duration of the trial and the scheduled clinic visits.
Shorter recall periods may underestimate symptom burden when symptoms have diurnal or day-to-day fluctuation and may place undue burden on patients. On the other hand, recall intervals that are too long may either over- or underestimate the health state. Therefore, appropriate criteria should be considered given attributes of the disease when selecting an adequate recall period.
KeywordsPatient-reported outcomes Recall period Measurement
- 1.Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development of support labeling claims. Federal Register. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf.
- 2.Stull, D. E., Leidy, N. K., Parasuraman, B., & Chassany, O. (2009). Optimal recall periods for patient-reported outcomes: Challenges and potential solutions. CMRO, 24(4), 929–942.Google Scholar
- 6.National Cancer Institute. (2008). The nation’s investment in cancer research: A plan and budget proposal for fiscal year 2008. NIH Publication No. 06–6090. Available at: http://plan.cancer.gov. Accessed 22 Aug 2008.
- 12.Furlong, W. B., Feeny, D., & Yandow, S. (2005). Patient-focused measures of functional health status and health-related quality of life in pediatric orthopedics: A case study in measurement selection. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, (3), 1477–7525.Google Scholar
- 13.Bellamy, N., Buchanan, W. W., Goldsmith, C. H., Campbell, J., & Stitt, L. W. (1988). Validation-study of WOMAC: A health-status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug-therapy in patients with osteo-arthritis of the hip or knee. Journal of Rheumatology, 15(12), 1833–1840.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Camilleri, M., Chey, W. Y., Mayer, E. A., Northcutt, A. R., Heath, A., Dukes, G. E., et al. (2001). A randomized controlled clinical trial of the serotonin type 3 receptor antagonist alosetron in women with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161(14), 1733–1740.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Leventer, S., Raudibaugh, K., Frissora, C., Mangel, A., Galbraith, K. B., Kucharik, R., et al. (2005). The safety and efficacy of dextofisopam in patients with diarrhea-predominant or alternating irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology, 128(4), A94.Google Scholar
- 16.Nyhlin, H., Bang, C., Elsborg, L., Silvennoinen, J., Holme, I., Ruegg, P., et al. (2004). A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of tegaserod in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 39(2), 119–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Miner, P., Stanton, D. B., Carter, F., Caras, S., Krause, G., & Steinborn, C. (2004). Cilansetron in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea predominance (IBS-D): Efficacy and safety in a 3 months US study. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 99(10), S277.Google Scholar
- 18.Fehnel, S., Johnston, J., Kurtz, C., & Mangel, A. (2006). Assessing global change and symptom severity in subjects with IBS: Qualitative item testing. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 101, S483.Google Scholar
- 22.Feinstein, R. P. (2007). Androgenetic Alopecia. EMedicine (from WebMD).Google Scholar
- 24.Lucky, A. W., Piacquadio, D. J., Ditre, C. M., Dunlap, F., Kantor, I., Pandya, A. G., et al. (2004). A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 5 and 2% topical minoxidil solutions in the treatment of female pattern hair loss. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 50(4), 541–553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Revicki, D. A., Camilleri, M., Kuo, B., Norton, J. N., Murray, L., Palsgrove, A., & Parkman, H. P. (2009). Development and content validity of a gastroparesis cardinal symptom index daily diary. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 30(6), 670–680.Google Scholar
- 26.Revicki, D. A., Margolis, M. K., Bush, E. N., DeRogatis, L. R., & Hanes, V. (2011). Content validity of the female sexual function index (FSFI) in pre- and postmenopausal women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Journal of Sexual Medicine (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar