Quality of Life Research

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 1031–1043 | Cite as

Development and psychometric evaluation of the public health surveillance well-being scale

  • C. M. BannEmail author
  • R. Kobau
  • M. A. Lewis
  • M. M. Zack
  • C. Luncheon
  • W. W. Thompson



To develop and psychometrically evaluate the brief Public Health Surveillance Well-Being Scale (PHS-WB) that captures mental, physical, and social components of well-being.


Using data from 5,399 HealthStyles survey respondents, we conducted bi-factor, item response theory, and differential item functioning analyses to examine the psychometric properties of a pool of 34 well-being items. Based on the statistical results and content considerations, we developed a brief 10-item well-being scale and assessed its construct validity through comparisons of demographic subgroups and correlations with measures of related constructs.


Based on the bi-factor analyses, the items grouped into both an overall factor and individual domain-specific factors. The PHS-WB scale demonstrated good internal consistency (alpha = 0.87) and correlated highly with scores for the entire item pool (r = 0.94). The well-being scale scores differed as expected across demographic groups and correlated with global and domain-specific measures of similar constructs, supporting its construct validity.


The 10-item PHS-WB scale demonstrates good psychometric properties, and its high correlation with the item pool suggests minimal loss of information with the use of fewer items. The brief PHS-WB allows for well-being assessment on national surveys or in other situations where a longer form may not be feasible.


Well-being Scale development Quality of life Item response theory Factor analysis Differential item functioning 



Healthy People 2020


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System


World Health Organization


Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System


Comparative Fit Index


Tucker-Lewis Fit Index


Standardized Root Mean Square Residual


Item response theory


Differential item functioning


Classification and regression tree


Socioeconomic status


National Health Interview Survey


Health-related quality of life

Supplementary material

11136_2011_2_MOESM1_ESM.doc (74 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 75 kb)


  1. 1.
    Thacker, S. B., Stroup, D. F., Carande-Kulis, V., Marks, J. S., Roy, K., & Gerberding, J. L. (2006). Measuring the public’s health. Public Health Reports, 121(1), 14–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Etches, V., Frank, J., Di Ruggiero, E., & Manuel, D. (2006). Measuring population health: A review of indicators. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 29–55. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marshall, W. S., Saxena, S., & McQueen, D. V. (2005). The momentum for mental health promotion. IUPHE Promotion and Education (Suppl 2), 6–9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liburd, L. C., & Sniezek, J. E. (2007). Changing times: New possibilities for community health and well-being. Preventing Chronic Disease, 4(3), A73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kobau, R., Sniezek, J., Zack, M. M., Lucas, R. E., & Burns, A. (2010). Well-being assessment: An evaluation of well-being scales for public health and population estimates of well-being among US adults. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2(3), 272–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lyuobomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3(1), 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaplan, R. M., & Anderson, J. P. (1988). The quality of well-being scale: Rationale for a single quality of life index. In S. R. Walker & R. Rosser (Eds.), Quality of life: Assessment and application (pp. 51–77). London, United Kingdom: MTP Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Boyle, M., & Torrance, G. W. (1995). Multi-attribute health status classification systems: Health Utilities Index. PharmacoEconomics, 7(6), 490–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Strine, T. W., Chapman, D. P., Balluz, L. S., Moriarty, D. G., & Mokdad, A. H. (2008). The associations between life satisfaction and health-related quality of life, chronic illness, and health behaviors among US community-dwelling adults. Journal of Community Health, 33(1), 40–50. doi: 10.1007/s10900-007-9066-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eid, M., & Larsen, R. J. (2008). The science of subjective well-being. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Healthy People 2020. Accessed 3 February 2011.
  14. 14.
    Keyes, C. L. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(2), 207–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keyes, C. L. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62(2), 95–108. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huppert, F. A., Marks, N., Clark, A. E., Siegrist, J., Stutzer, A., & Vittersø, J., et al. (2008). Measuring well-being across Europe: Description of the ESS Well-being Module and preliminary findings. PSE Working Papers 2008-40, PSE (Ecole normale supérieure).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Headlye, B., Muffels, R., & Wagner, G. G. (2010). Long-running German panel survey shows that personal and economic choices, not genes, matter for happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(42), 17922–17926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    U.K. Office of National Statistics. (2010, 25 November). Measuring national well-being. Accessed 1 February 2011.
  19. 19.
    Kindig, D., Day, P., Fox, D. M., Gibson, M., Knickman, J., & Lomas, J., et al. (2003). What new knowledge would help policymakers better balance investments for optimal health outcomes? Health Services Research, 38(6 Pt 2), 1923–1937.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kickbusch, I. (2003). The contribution of the World Health Organization to a new public health and health promotion. American Journal of Public Health, 93(3), 383–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Herrman, H. S., Saxena, S., & Moodie, R. (2005). Promoting mental health: Concepts, emerging evidence, practice. A WHO report in collaboration with the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation and the University of Melbourne. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jane-Llopis, E., Barry, M., Hosman, C., & Patel, V. (2005). Mental health promotion works: A review. Promotion et Education, Suppl 2, 9–25, 61, 67.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barry, M. M., & Jenkins, R. (2007). Implementing mental health promotion. Oxford, United Kingdom: Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Friedli, L. (2009). Mental health, resilience and inequalities. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Steinberg, K. (2007). Wellness in every stage of life: A new paradigm for public health programs. Preventing Chronic Disease, 4(1), A02.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Navarro, A. M., Voetsch, K. P., Liburd, L. C., Giles, H. W., & Collins, J. L. (2007). Charting the future of community health promotion: Recommendations from the National Expert Panel on Community Health Promotion. Preventing Chronic Disease, 4(3), A68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dolan, P., & White, M. P. (2007). How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pollard, W. E. (2007). Evaluation of consumer panel survey data for public health communication planning: An analysis of annual survey data from 1995–2006. American Statistical Association 2007 Proceedings of the Section on Health Policy Statistics, 1528–1533.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pollard, W. E. (2002). Use of consumer panel survey data for public health communication planning: An evaluation of survey results. In Proceedings of the section on health policy statistics (pp. 2720–2724). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    World Health Organization. (1946). Preamble to the constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference. New York, 19–22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    World Health Organization Quality of Life Group. (1995). Field Trial WHOQOL-100: The 100 questions with response scales. Accessed 5 November 2010.
  32. 32.
    Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., & Reeve, B., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Samman, E. (2007). Psychological and subjective well-being: A proposal for internationally comparable indicators. Oxford Development Studies, 35(4), 459–486. Presented at the OPHI workshop on Missing Dimensions of Poverty Data, Oxford, 429 May, and International Workshop on Dimensions and Indicators of Human Development, Beijing, 454 November.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2000). Measuring healthy days. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuit: Human needs and self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. P. (2006). Review of research on the influences on personal well-being and application to policymaking: Final report for DEFRA (UK Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). London: DEFRA.
  38. 38.
    Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2011). Behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Accessed 3 February 2011.
  41. 41.
    Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th edn). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Scientific Software International. (2003). IRT from SSI: BILOG-MG, MULTILOG, PARSCALE, TESTFACT. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 34(4, pt. 2), 100.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Thissen, D. (2001). IRTLRDIF v.2.0b: Software for the computation of the statistics involved in item response theory likelihood-ratio tests for differential item functioning. Accessed 1 February 2011.
  46. 46.
    Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2007). Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes (2nd ed.). West Sussex, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Flora, D., & Thissen, D. (2002). User’s guide for IRTScore: Item response theory score approximation software. L.L. Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory Electronic Research Memorandum 2002–1.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Thissen, D., Pommerich, M., Billeaud, K., & Williams, V. S. L. (1995). Item response theory for scores on tests including polytomous items with ordered responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(1), 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Barger, S. D., Donoho, C. J., & Wayment, H. A. (2009). The relative contributions of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, health, and social relationships to life satisfaction in the United States. Quality of Life Research, 18(2), 179–189. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9426-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Branchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Myers, D. G. (2000). The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55(1), 56–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Keyes, C. L., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Organization for Economic Co-operation, Development (OECD). (2006). Statistics brief: Alternative measures of well-being (No. 11). Paris, France: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Alvarez-Diaz, A., Gonzalez, L., & Radcliff, B. (2010). The politics of happiness: On the determinants of quality of life in the American states. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 894–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well-being, social capital and public policy: What’s new? Economic Journal, 116(510), C34–C45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Green, L. W., & Kreuter, M. W. (2004). Health planning: An educational and ecological approach (4th ed.). San Francisco: McGraw Hill Publishers.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Inglehart, R. (2002). Gender, aging, and subjective well-being. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43(3–5), 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Keyes, C. L., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2002). Complete health: Prevalence and predictors among US adults in 1995. American Journal of Health Promotion, 17(2), 122–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    New Economics Foundation. (2011). Measuring our progress: The power of well-being. London, United Kingdom: The Centre for Well-being.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. M. Bann
    • 1
    Email author
  • R. Kobau
    • 2
  • M. A. Lewis
    • 1
  • M. M. Zack
    • 2
  • C. Luncheon
    • 2
  • W. W. Thompson
    • 2
  1. 1.RTI InternationalResearch Triangle ParkUSA
  2. 2.Centers for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations