The development and validation of a general measure of well-being: the BBC well-being scale
- 835 Downloads
The concept of maximising well-being, as opposed to merely treating mental disorder, is a powerful current theme in the area of mental health. Clearly this emphasises the need for appropriate valid and reliable measures of general well-being. This paper examines the appropriateness of a number of measures in this area and concludes that existing assessment tools fail to address the full range of aspects of personal well-being. This paper therefore presents the psychometric properties, validity and reliability of a new measure of well-being—the BBC Well-being Scale.
A total of 1,940 participants completed the new measure, the Goldberg scales of anxiety and depression, the ‘List of Threatening Experiences’ life events scale, a modified version of the Response Styles Questionnaire and a modified version of the Internal, Personal and Situational Attributions Questionnaire presented via the internet.
Exploratory factor-analysis suggested a three-factor solution including themes of psychological well-being, physical health and well-being and relationships. The total 24-item scale had good internal consistency (α = .935) and correlated significantly with key demographic variables and measures of concurrent validity.
The new measure—the BBC Well-being Scale—is recommended for research and clinical purposes.
KeywordsWell being Mental health Measurement Quality of life Self-esteem Questionnaire
- 2.World Health Organisation. (1946). Constitution of the world health organisation. New York: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
- 3.World Health Organisation. (2003). Investing in mental health. Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
- 4.Department of Health. (2009). New horizons: Towards a shared vision for mental health. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
- 8.Diener, E. (Ed.). (2009). Assessing well-being: Defining and measuring subjective well-being (Social indicators research series). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- 9.WHOQOL Group. (1994). The development of the world health organization quality of life assessment instrument (the WHOQOL). In J. Orley & W. Kuyken (Eds.), Quality of life assessment: International perspectives (pp. 41–57). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- 19.Huppert, F. A., Baylis, N., & Keverne, B. (2005). The science of well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 20.Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- 26.Bowerman, B. L., & O’Connell, R. T. (1990). Linear statistical models: An applied approach (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury.Google Scholar
- 27.Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). New features in LISREL8. Chicago: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
- 28.Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- 30.Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 31.Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- 32.Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modelling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 77–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar