Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 653–664 | Cite as

Patterns of reporting health-related quality of life outcomes in randomized clinical trials: implications for clinicians and quality of life researchers

  • Michael Brundage
  • Brenda Bass
  • Judith Davidson
  • John Queenan
  • Andrea Bezjak
  • Jolie Ringash
  • Anna Wilkinson
  • Deb Feldman-Stewart
Article

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the patterns of, and trends over time in, health-related quality of life (HRQL) reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

The English-language literature of RCTs published in 2002–2008 was identified using Medline, Embase, and Healthstar databases, in addition to the Cochrane Clinical Trials Registry. Eligible trials were phase III studies that included an HRQL outcome. Data were abstracted on eight outcomes derived from previously recommended quality standards for reporting HRQL, and on four outcomes describing how HRQL data are presented in RCT reports. Two readers examined each article; discrepancies were resolved through discussion and third review if required.

Results

A sample of 794 RCTs was identified. HRQL was a primary outcome in 25.4% (200/794). One hundred and ten RCTs (14%) used “supplementary” reports (separate from the first publication) to report HRQL findings. The proportion of RCTs that met the eight quality indicators ranged from 15% (HRQL used in the calculation of sample size) to 81% (reporting instrument validity). RCTs with HRQL as a primary outcome or with a supplementary report had higher concordance on the quality measures. Reporting improved on many indicators over time. Substantive variation in how HRQL data are presented in RCTs was evident.

Conclusions

Current practice of reporting HRQL outcomes in RCTs remains highly variable, both with regard to quality of reporting and the patterns of data analysis and presentation. This variation presents challenges for clinicians to apply these data in clinical practice. Consistent reporting practices, which are interpretable by clinicians, are required, as are processes to achieve this consistency in future reports.

Keywords

Quality of life Treatment outcome Patient-reported outcome Randomized clinical trials 

Abbreviations

HRQL

Health-related quality of life

RCT

Randomized clinical trial

CONSORT

Consolidated standards of reporting trials

Notes

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the work of Ms. Sarah Fleming in performing literature searches and data abstraction relating to the 2003–2004 data and Kim Foley for her work in doing the SAS analysis of the 2006–2008 data. Ms. Sarah Pickett assisted in locating and printing the 2006–2008 papers. We also thank the Editor and the two anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. None of the authors declare a conflict of interest in the submission of this manuscript. This work was funded in part by a research operating grant from the National Cancer Institute of Canada. Dr. Brundage is supported by a Cancer Care Ontario Research Chair award.

References

  1. 1.
    Karnofsky, D. A., Abelmann, W. H., Craver, L. F., & Burchenal, J. H. (1948). The use of nitrogen mustards in the palliative treatment of carcinoma. Cancer, 1, 634–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steinbrocker, O., Traeger, C. H., & Batterman, R. C. (1949). Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. JAMA, 140(8), 659–662.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowling, A. (1995). Measuring disease: A review of disease-specific quality of life measurement scales. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ellwood, P. M. (1988). Shattuck lecture-outcomes management. A technology of patient experience. New England Journal of Medicine, 318(23), 1549–1556.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oxman, A. D., Sackett, D. L., & Guyatt, G. H. (1993). Users’ guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Journal of the American Medical Association, 270(17), 2093–2095.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Staquet, M., Berzon, R., Osoba, D., & Machin, D. (1996). Guidelines for reporting results of quality of life assessments in clinical trials. Quality of Life Research, 5(5), 496–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, C. W., & Chi, K. N. (2000). The standard of reporting of health-related quality of life in clinical cancer trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(5), 451–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Efficace, F., Bottomley, A., & van Andel, G. (2003). Health related quality of life in prostate carcinoma patients: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Cancer, 97(2), 377–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Efficace, F., Bottomley, A., Osoba, D., et al. (2003). Beyond the development of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures: A checklist for evaluating HRQOL outcomes in cancer clinical trials–does HRQOL evaluation in prostate cancer research inform clinical decision making? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21(18), 3502–3511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Efficace, F., Osoba, D., Gotay, C., Sprangers, M., Coens, C., & Bottomley, A. (2007). Has the quality of health-related quality of life reporting in cancer clinical trials improved over time? Towards bridging the gap with clinical decision making. Annals of Oncology, 18(4), 775–781.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Joly, F., Vardy, J., Pintilie, M., & Tannock, I. F. (2007). Quality of life and/or symptom control in randomized clinical trials for patients with advanced cancer. Annals of Oncology, 18, 1935–1942.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guyatt, G. H., Naylor, C. D., Juniper, E., Heyland, D. K., Jaeschke, R., & Cook, D. J. (1997). Users’ guides to the medical literature. XII. How to use articles about health-related quality of life. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(15), 1232–1237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sprangers, M. A., Moinpour, C. M., Moynihan, T. J., Patrick, D. L., & Revicki, D. A. (2002). Assessing meaningful change in quality of life over time: A users’ guide for clinicians. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(6), 561–571.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bezjak, A., Ng, P., Skeel, R., DePetrillo, A. D., Comis, R., & Taylor, K. M. (2001). Oncologists’ use of quality of life information: Results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians. Quality of Life Research, 10(1), 1–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guyatt, G., & Schunemann, H. (2007). How can quality of life researchers make their work more useful to health workers and their patients? Quality of Life Research, 16, 1097–1105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brundage, M. D., Bezjak, A., Ringash, J., & Fleming, S. (2005). Patterns of reporting quality of life data in randomized clinical trials. San Francisco: ISOQOL. Ref Type: Abstract.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Begg, C., Cho, M., Eastwood, S., et al. (1996). Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA, 276(8), 637–639.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    SAS System for Windows [computer program]. (1989). Version 6.12. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guyatt, G. H., Sackett, D. L., & Cook, D. J. (1993). Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Journal of the American Medical Association, 270(21), 2598–2601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sackett, D. L., & Cook, D. J. (1994). Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B. What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Journal of the American Medical Association, 271(1), 59–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oxman, A. D., Cook, D. J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1994). Users’ guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(17), 1367–1371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fayers, P. M., Hopwood, P., Harvey, A., Girling, D. J., Machin, D., & Stephens, R. (1997). Quality of life assessment in clinical trials—guidelines and a checklist for protocol writers: The U.K. Medical Research Council experience. European Journal of Cancer, 33(1), 20–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guyatt, G., Osoba, D., Wu, A., Wyrwich, K. W., & Norman, G. R. (2002). Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(4), 371–383.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Curran, C. R. (1999). Data display techniques. Applied Nursing Research, 12, 153–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Standing, L., Conezio, J., & Haber, R. (1970). Perception and memory for pictures: Single-trial learning of 2500 visual stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 19(2), 73–74.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Feldman-Stewart, D., Kocovski, N., McConnell, B., Brundage, M., & Mackillop, W. (2000). Perception of quantitative information for treatment decisions. Medical Decision Making, 20(2), 228–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brundage, M., Feldman-Stewart, D., Leis, A., et al. (2005). Communicating quality of life information to cancer patients: A study of six presentation formats. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(28), 6949–6956.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bottomley, A., Flechtner, H., Efficace, F., et al. (2005). Health related quality of life outcomes in cancer clinical trials. [Review] [53 refs]. European Journal of Cancer, 41(12), 1697–1709.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Brundage
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Brenda Bass
    • 2
  • Judith Davidson
    • 2
  • John Queenan
    • 2
  • Andrea Bezjak
    • 3
  • Jolie Ringash
    • 3
  • Anna Wilkinson
    • 2
  • Deb Feldman-Stewart
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of OncologyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  2. 2.Cancer Care & Epidemiology, Queen’s Cancer Research InstituteQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  3. 3.Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston General HospitalKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations