New Australian population scoring coefficients for the old version of the SF-36 and SF-12 health status questionnaires
- 933 Downloads
To compare the relationship of the eight SF-36 v1 subscale scores to the summary scores of the PCS and MCS derived from two different scoring algorithms: one based on the original scoring method (Ware, Kosinski and Keller, SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a users manual. The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, Boston, MA, 1994); and the other based on scoring algorithms that use parameters derived from structural equation modelling. Further, to provide SF-12 scoring algorithms similarly based on structural equation modelling.
The Australian Bureau of Statistics 1995 Australian National Health Survey dataset was used as the basis for the production of coefficients. There were 18,141 observations with no missing data for all eight SF-36 subscales following imputation of data items, and 17,479 observations with no missing data for the SF-12 data items. Data were analysed in LISREL V8.71. Structural equation models were fit to the data in confirmatory factor analyses producing weighted least squares estimates, which overcame anomalies found in the traditional orthogonal scoring methods.
Models with acceptable fits to the hypothesised factor structure were produced, generating factor score weighting coefficients for use with the SF-36 and SF-12 data items, to produce PCS and MCS summary scores consistent with their underlying subscale scores.
The coefficients generated will score the SF-36 summary PCS and MCS in a manner consistent with their subscales. Previous Australian studies using version 1 of SF-36 or SF-12 can re-score their summary scores using these coefficients.
KeywordsSF-36 summary scores Structural Equation Model PCS MCS
- 1.Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user’s guide. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation.Google Scholar
- 2.Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1995) National Health Survey. SF-36 Population Norms Australia. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Catalogue Number 4399.0.Google Scholar
- 5.McCallum, J. (1995). The new SF-36 health status measure: Australian validity tests. In Paper presented to the Health Outcomes and Quality of Life Measurement Conference. Canberra: National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health.Google Scholar
- 9.Quality Metric Incorporated. (2008). SF-36 v2TM and SF-12 v2 TM Health Surveys Offer Substantial Improvements. www.SF-36.org/commnity/SF36V2andSF12V2.shtml. Accessed June 20, 2008.
- 11.Sansoni, J., & Costi, J. (2001). SF-36 Version 1 or Version 2: The need for Australian normative data. In Proceedings of Health Outcomes 2001: The Odyssey Advances Conference. Canberra: Australian Health Outcomes Collaboration.Google Scholar
- 16.Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1994). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: A users manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre.Google Scholar
- 17.Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). The SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre.Google Scholar