Discriminative capacity of the EQ-5D, SF-6D, and SF-12 as measures of health status in population health survey
To compare the EQ-5D, SF-6D, and SF-12 in terms of their capacity to discriminate between groups defined by relevant socio-demographic and health characteristics in a general population survey.
Data were obtained from the 2006 Catalan Health Interview Survey, a representative sample (n = 4,319) of the general population of Catalonia (Spain). Effect sizes (ES) and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to evaluate the instruments’ capacity to distinguish between groups based on socio-demographic variables, recent health problems, perceived health, psychological distress, and selected chronic conditions.
All instruments showed a similar discriminative capacity between groups based on socio-demographic variables, recent medical visit (ES = 0.47–0.55), activity limitations (ES = 0.92–0.98), perceived health (ES = 0.97–1.33), and psychological well-being (ES = 1.17–1.57). Effect sizes between respondents with and without any of fourteen selected chronic conditions were large (0.76–1.04) for 4, moderate (0.55–0.74) for 8, and small (0.17–0.39) for two on the EQ-5D index. A similar pattern was observed for the SF-12 but ES were predominantly moderate (7 conditions) or small (6 conditions) on the SF-6D.
The EQ-5D and SF-12 were largely comparable in estimating the health burden of chronic conditions, recent health problems, and social inequalities. The SF-6D was less sensitive than the EQ-5D index and SF-12, particularly for physical chronic conditions.
KeywordsMental Component Summary Chronic Physical Condition Problem Effect Size Specific Chronic Condition Chronic Allergy
- 9.Saarni, S. I., Harkanen, T., Sintonen, H., Suvisaari, J., Koskinen, S., Aromaa, A., et al. (2006). The impact of 29 chronic conditions on health-related quality of life: A general population survey in Finland using 15D and EQ-5D. Quality of Life Research, 15(8), 1403–1414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Marra, C. A., Woolcott, J. C., Kopec, J. A., Shojania, K., Offer, R., Brazier, J. E., et al. (2005). A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Social Science and Medicine, 60(7), 1571–1582.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Borrell, C., Fernandez, E., Schiaffino, A., Benach, J., Rajmil, L., Villalbi, J. R., et al. (2001). Social class inequalities in the use of and access to health services in Catalonia, Spain: What is the influence of supplemental private health insurance? International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 13(2), 117–125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.IDESCAT. (2008). Official Catalan Institute of Statistics. Available at: http://www.idescat.cat. Accessed October 20, 2008.
- 39.Ware, J. E., Jr., Kosinski, M., Turner-Bowker, D. M., & Gandek, B. (2002). How to score version 2 of the SF-12 Health Survey (with a supplement documenting version 1). Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric, Inc.Google Scholar
- 47.Goldberg, D. P., & Williams, P. (1988). A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. London: Institute of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
- 49.Research Triangle Institute. (2004). SUDAAN language manual, release 9.0. North Carolina, EEUU: Research Triangle Institute, NC. Available at: http://www.rti.org/sudaan.
- 50.Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Estimation of a single effect size: Parametric and non parametric methods. In Statistical methods for meta-analysis (pp. 75–106). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- 51.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elrbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- 53.Osborne, R. H., Hawthorne, G., Lew, E. A., & Gray, L. C. (2003). Quality of life assessment in the community-dwelling elderly: Validation of the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) instrument and comparison with the SF-36. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56(2), 138–147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar