An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales
- First Online:
- 750 Downloads
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) aims to develop self-reported item banks for clinical research. The PROMIS pediatrics (aged 8–17) project focuses on the development of item banks across several health domains (physical function, pain, fatigue, emotional distress, social role relationships, and asthma symptoms). The psychometric properties of the anxiety and depressive symptom item banks are described.
Participants (n = 1,529) were recruited in public school settings, hospital-based outpatient and subspecialty pediatrics clinics. The anxiety (k = 18) and depressive symptoms (k = 21) items were split between two test administration forms. Hierarchical confirmatory factor-analytic models (CFA) were conducted to evaluate scale dimensionality and local dependence. IRT analyses were then used to finalize item banks and short forms.
CFA results confirmed that anxiety and depressive symptoms are separate constructs and indicative of negative affect. Items with local dependence and DIF were removed resulting in 15 anxiety and 14 depressive symptoms items. The psychometric differences between short forms and simulated computer adaptive tests are presented.
PROMIS pediatric item banks were developed to provide efficient assessment of health-related quality of life domains. This sample provides initial calibrations of anxiety and depressive symptoms item banks and creates PROMIS pediatric instruments, version 1.0.
KeywordsPROMIS Anxiety Depressive symptoms HRQOL PRO Scale development Surveys Pediatrics
Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system
Pediatric quality of life inventory™
Health-related quality of life
Confirmatory factor analysis
Item response theory
Differential item function
- 3.http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/child-and-adolescent-mental-health/index.shtml last accessed October 5, 2009.
- 6.Irwin, D. E., Varni, J. W., Yeatts, K., & DeWalt, D. (2009). Cognitive interviewing methodology in the development of a pediatric item bank: A patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7(3), 1–10.Google Scholar
- 9.Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Morgan DeWitt, E., Lai, J. S., Yeatts, K., Varni, J. W., & DeWalt, D. A. (2010). Sampling plan and patient characteristics of the PROMIS pediatrics large scale survey. Quality of Life Research manuscript under review.Google Scholar
- 10.Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life items banks: Plans for the patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45, S22–S31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Muthén, B., du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squared and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén, Unpublished technical report.Google Scholar
- 12.Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2004). Mplus user’s guide (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen (Ed.).Google Scholar
- 13.Hill, C. D., Edwards, M. C., Thissen, D., Langer, M. M., Wirth, R. J., Burwinkle, T. M., et al. (2007). Practical issues in the application of item response theory: A demonstration using items from the pediatric quality of life inventory™ (PedsQL™) 4.0 generic core scales. Medical Care, 45, S39–S47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores, Psychometrika Monograph. No. 17.Google Scholar
- 15.Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85–100). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- 16.du Toit, M. (Ed.). (2003). IRT from SSI. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
- 19.Bjorner, J. B., Smith, K. J., Edelen, M. O., Stone, C., Thissen, D., & Sun, X. (2007). IRTFIT: A macro for item fit and local dependence tests under IRT models. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.Google Scholar
- 20.Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Wainer, H. (1993). Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 67–113). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- 21.Thissen, D. (2001). IRTLRDIF: Software for the computation of the statistics involved in item response theory likelihood-ratio tests for differential item functioning. Chapel Hill, NC: L. L. Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
- 22.Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 57, 289–300.Google Scholar
- 23.Williams, V. S. L., Jones, L. V., & Tukey, J. W. (1999). Controlling error in multiple comparisons, with examples from state-to-state differences in educational achievement. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 42–69.Google Scholar
- 25.Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- 27.Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (2003). LISREL 8.5. Lincolwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
- 28.Thissen, D., Nelson, L., Rosa, K., & McLeod, L. D. (2001). Item response theory for items scored in more than two categories. In D. Thissen & H. Wainer (Eds.), Test scoring (pp. 141–186). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- 31.Chen, W. H., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indices for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265–289.Google Scholar
- 32.Reeve, B. B. (2000). Item- and scale-level analysis of clinical and non-clinical sample responses to the MMPI-2 depression scales employing item response theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
- 34.Schaeffer, N. C. (1998). An application of item response theory to the measurement of depression. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology (Vol. 18, pp. 271–307). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
- 41.Watson, D., Clark, L. A., Weber, K., Assenheimer, J. S., Strauss, M. E., & McCormick, R. A. (1995). Testing a tripartite model: II. Exploring the symptom structure of anxiety and depression in student, adult, and patient samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 15–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.Pilkonis, P. A., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., Cella, D. (in press). Items banks for measuring emotional distress from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Depression, anxiety, and anger. Manuscript in press.Google Scholar