Quality of Life Research

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 515–520

Associations between body mass index and health-related quality of life among Australian adults




To assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and health-related quality of life (HQoL), as measured by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) within a sample with broad population coverage.

Subjects and methods

Survey data incorporating the SF-36 questionnaire, height and weight were obtained from a nationally representative sample of 9,771 Australians aged 21 or older (4,649 men and 5,122 women). Linear multiple regression methods were employed to estimate the magnitude of association between BMI classes and HQoL variables, adjusting for disability and other covariates.


Less than 1% of men and just 3.5% of women were classified as underweight while 52.2% of women and 65.9% of men were classified as overweight or obese. For all SF-36 health dimensions, people with BMI scores in the healthy range reported, on average, higher health-related HQoL scores than underweight and obese people, and HQoL scores decreased with the degree of obesity. Although overweight and obesity were associated with decreasing levels of both physical and emotional well-being, the deterioration in health status was significantly more evident in the physical than in the mental, social or emotional dimensions.


Low and high BMIs were associated with decreasing levels of both physical and emotional well-being, but the deterioration in health status was more consistent in the physical than in other dimensions.


BMI Obesity Underweight Health-related quality of life Australia 


  1. 1.
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Health at glance. 2009 OECD indicators, 5th edn. Paris: OECD Publishing. <Available at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/24630287/Health-at-a-Glance-2009-OECD-Indicators}.
  2. 2.
    Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). National health survey: Summary of results, 2004–2005. Cat No. 4364.0. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Olshansky, S., Passaro, D., Hershow, R., Layden, J., Carnes, B., Brody, J., et al. (2005). A potential decline in life expectancy in the United States in the 21st Century. New England Journal of Medicine;, 352, 1138–1145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wiczinski, E., Döring, A., John, J., Lengerke, T. V., & Group, F. T. (2009). Obesity and health-related quality of life: Does social support moderate existing associations? British Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 717–734.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Le Pen, C., Levy, E., Loos, F., Banzet, M., & Basdevant, A. (1998). “Specific” scale compared with “generic” scale: A double measurement of the quality of life in a French community sample of obese subjects. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 52, 445–450.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Doll, H., Petersen, S., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2000). Obesity and physical and emotional well-being: Associations between body mass index, chronic illness, and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 questionnaire. Obesity Research, 8, 160–170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mond, J. M., & Baune, B. T. (2009). Overweight, medical comorbidity and health-related quality of life in a community sample of women and men. Obesity, 17, 1627–1634.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sullivan, M., Karlsson, J., Sjostrom, L., Backman, L., Bengtsson, C., Bouchard, C., et al. (1993). Swedish obese subjects (SOS) -an intervention study of obesity. Baseline evaluation of health, psychosocial functioning in the first 1743 subjects examined. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, 17, 503–512.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Katz, D. A., McHorney, C. A., & Atkinson, R. L. (2000). Impact of obesity on health-related quality of life in patients with chronic illness. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 15, 789–796.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Han, T. S., Tijhuis, M., Lean, M., & Seidell, J. (1998). Quality of life in relation to overweight and body fat distribution. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 1814–1820.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang, I. C., Frangakis, C., & Wu, A. W. (2006). The relationship of excess body weight and health-related quality of life: Evidence from a population study in Taiwan. International Journal of Obesity, 30, 1250–1259.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hach, I., Ruhl, U., Klose, M., Klotsche, J., Kirch, W., & Jacobi, F. (2007). Obesity and the risk for mental disorders in a representative German adult sample. The European Journal of Public Health, 17, 297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ford, E. S., Moriarty, D. G., Zack, M. M., Mokdad, A. H., & Chapman, D. P. (2001). Self reported body mass index and health related quality of life. Findings from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Obesity Research, 9, 21–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wooden, M., & Watson, N. (2007). The HILDA survey and its contribution to economic and social research (So Far). The Economic Record, 83, 208–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    World Health Organization. (2000). Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic: Report of a WHO consultation. Technical Report Series 894. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1997). 1995 National health survey—SF-36 population norms, Australia. ABS Catalogue No. 4399.0. Canberra: ABS.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu, H., Feurer, I., Dwyer, K., Speroff, T., Shaffer, D., & Wright Pinson, C. (2007). The effects of gender and age on health-related quality of life following kidney transplantation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17, 82–89.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weeks, W., Kazis, L., Shen, Y., Cong, Z., Ren, X., Miller, D., et al. (2004). Differences in Health-related quality of life in rural and urban veterans. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 1762–1767.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). Overweight and obesity in adults, Australia, 200405. Canberra: ABS.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2004). The health consequences of smoking: What it means to you. Washington: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Edwards, T. C., Patrick, D. L., & Topolski, T. D. (2003). Quality of life of adolescents with perceived disabilities. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 28, 233–241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nicholl, B. I., Macfarlane, G. J., Davies, K. A., Morriss, R., Dickens, C., & McBetha, J. (2009). Premorbid psychosocial factors are associated with poor health-related quality of life in subjects with new onset of chronic widespread pain-Results from the EPIFUND study. Pain, 141, 119–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith, J. P. (1999). Healthy bodies and thick wallets: The dual relation between health and economic status. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13, 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Adams, P., Hurd, M. D., McFadden, D., Merrill, A., & Ribeiro, T. (2003). Healthy, wealthy, and wise? Tests for direct causal paths between health and socioeconomic status. Journal of Econometrics, 112, 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Samsa, G. P., Kolotkin, R., Williams, R., Nguyen, M., & Mendel, C. (2001). Effect of moderate weight loss on health-related quality of life: An analysis of combined data from 4 randomized trials of sibutramine vs placebo. The American Journal of Managed Care, 7, 875–883.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ussher, J. M., & Swann, C. (2000). A double blind placebo controlled trial examining the relationship between health-related quality of life and dietary supplements. British Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Public Health Research, Evaluation and Policy Cluster, Deakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia
  2. 2.Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations