Abandoning the language of “response shift”: a plea for conceptual clarity in distinguishing scale recalibration from true changes in quality of life
Quality of life researchers have been studying “response shift” for a decade now, in an effort to clarify how best to measure QoL over time and across changing circumstances. However, we contend that this line of research has been impeded by conceptual confusion created by the term “response shift”, that lumps together sources of measurement error (e.g., scale recalibration) with true causes of changing QoL (e.g., hedonic adaptation). We propose abandoning the term response shift, in favor of less ambiguous terms, like scale recalibration and adaptation.
KeywordsResponse shift Hedonic adaptation Scale recalibration Validity
- 11.Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
- 12.Ubel, P. A. (2006). You’re stronger than you think: Tapping into the secrets of emotionally resilient people. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- 15.Lepore, S. J., & Eton, D. T. (2000). Response shifts in prostate cancer patients: An evaluation of suppressor and buffer modes. In C. E. Schwartz & M. A. Sprangers (Eds.), Adaptation to changing health: Response shift in quality-of-life research (1st ed., pp. 37–51). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- 24.Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.Google Scholar