Health and role functioning: the use of focus groups in the development of an item bank
Role functioning is an important part of health-related quality of life. However, assessment of role functioning is complicated by the wide definition of roles and by fluctuations in role participation across the life-span. The aim of this study is to explore variations in role functioning across the lifespan using qualitative approaches, to inform the development of a role functioning item bank and to pilot test sample items from the bank.
Eight focus groups were conducted with a convenience sample of 38 English-speaking adults recruited in Rhode Island. Participants were stratified by gender and four age groups. Focus groups were taped, transcribed, and analyzed for thematic content.
Participants of all ages identified family roles as the most important. There was age variation in the importance of social life roles, with younger and older adults rating them as more important.
Occupational roles were identified as important by younger and middle-aged participants. The potential of health problems to affect role participation was recognized. Participants found the sample items easy to understand, response options identical in meaning and preferred five response choices.
Participants identified key aspects of role functioning and provided insights on their perception of the impact of health on their role participation. These results will inform item bank generation.
KeywordsRole functioning Focus group Life-span
The project described was supported by Award Number 1K01AG028760-01A1 from the National Institute on Aging. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Aging or the National Institutes of Health.
- 2.Conway, M. E. (1988). Theoretical approaches to the study of roles. In M. E. Hardy & K. Cook (Eds.), Role theory perspectives for health professionals (pp. 63–73). Norwalk: Appleton & Lange.Google Scholar
- 3.Hardy, M. E., & Hardy, W. (1988). Development of scientific knowledge. In M. E. Hardy & M. E. Conway (Eds.), Role theory: Perspectives for health professionals. Norwalk: Appleton&Lange.Google Scholar
- 4.Wiersma, D. (1988). Role functioning as a component of quality of life in mental disorders. In M. E. Hardy & M. E. Conway (Eds.), Role theory: Perspectives for health professionals (pp. 45–56). Norwalk: Appleton&Lange.Google Scholar
- 5.Sherbourne, D. C., Stewart, A. L., & Wells, K. B. (1992). Role functioning measures. In A. Stewart & J. E. Ware Jr (Eds.), Measuring functioning and well-being (pp. 205–219). Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- 6.World Health Organization. (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF—The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO).Google Scholar
- 12.Mangen, D. J., & Peterson, W. A. (1982). Social roles and social participation. In D. J. Mangen & W. A. Peterson (Eds.), Research instruments in social gerontology Vol. 2. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- 14.Graney, M. J. (1982). Social participation roles. In D. J. Mangen & W. A. Peterson (Eds.), Social roles and social participation (pp. 9–42). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- 17.Hardy, M. E., & Conway, M. E. (1988). Role theory: Perspectives for health professionals (2nd ed.). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.Google Scholar
- 18.McDowell, I. (1996). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 19.Loeppke, R., Hymel, P. A., Lofland, J. H., Pizzi, L. T., Konicki, D. L., Anstadt, G. W., et al. (2003). Health-related workplace productivity measurement: General and migraine-specific recommendations from the ACOEM Expert Panel. Journal of Occupation and Environmental Medicine, 45, 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Ware, J. E., Jr., & Dewey, J. (2000). How to score version two of the SF-36 health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.Google Scholar
- 25.Haley, S. M., Gandek, B., Siebens, H., Black-Schaffer, R. M., Sinclair, S. J., Tao, W., et al. (2008). Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 275–283.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Wainer, H., & Mislevy, R. J. (2000). Item response theory, item calibration, and proficiency estimation. In H. Wainer, N. J. Dorans, R. Flaugher, B. F. Green, L. Mislevy, L. Steinberg, & D. Thissen (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (pp. 61–101). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- 34.Barr, J., & Schumacher, G. (2003). Using focus groups to determine what constitutes quality of life in clients receiving medical nutrition therapy: First steps in the development of a nutrition quality-of-life survey. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 103, 844–851.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Mangione, C. M., Berry, S., Spritzer, K., Janz, N. K., Klein, R., Owsley, C., et al. (1998). Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: Results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Archives of Ophthalmology, 116, 227–233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration (2006). Guidance for Industry Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims.Google Scholar
- 39.Lawton, J. (2003). Lay experiences of health and illness: Past research and future agendas. Sociology of Health & Illness, 25, 23–40.Google Scholar
- 43.Anatchkova, M. D. & Bjorner, J. B. (2007). Conceptual Review of Role Functioing Measures Internal report.Google Scholar
- 44.Turner-Bowker, D. M., Saris-Baglama, R. N., DeRosa, M, Paulsen, C. A., & Bransfield, C. (2008). Participants’ experience of asthma: Results from a Focus Group Study. Poster presented at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 13th Annual International Meeting, Toronto, Canada. In.Google Scholar
- 45.Turner-Bowker, D. M., Saris-Baglama, R. N., DeRosa, M. A., Paulsen, C. A., & Bransfield, C. P. (2009). Using qualitative research to inform the development of a comprehensive outcomes assessment for asthma. The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, (in press).Google Scholar
- 46.Richardson, M. M., Saris-Baglama, R. N., Anatchkova, M. D., Stevens, L. A., Miskulin, D. C., Turner-Bowker, D. M. et al. (2007). Patient experience of chronic kidney disease (CKD): Results of a Focus Group Study. In.Google Scholar
- 47.Billson, J., Steinmeyer, M., Reis, K., & Downes, B. (2007). The impacts of chronic kidney disease on quality of life: Focus group exploration of domains/items for computerized adaptive testing. Technical report prepared for QualityMetric Incorporated: Group Dimensions International.Google Scholar