Quality of life in Serbian patients with Parkinson’s disease
The Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) is a well-validated British scale for the assessment of health-related quality of life (QoL) in Parkinson’s disease (PD).
To validate the Serbian version of the PDQ-39, while also providing additional information on the characteristics of this instrument.
Patient and methods
A total of 102 Serbian PD patients were asked to complete the PDQ-39, a disease-specific QoL questionnaire, as well as the generic, health status questionnaire (SF-36-version 1), and the 21-item Beck Depression Inventory. Neurological examination included the Hoehn and Yahr staging, Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (UPDRS)-part III, Schwab and England scale, and the Mini-Mental State Examination.
Internal consistency analysis yielded a Cronbach’s α of 0.83. Cronbach’s α was above 0.70 for seven out of eight subscales (range from 0.73 to 0.91). A hierarchical structure of the PDQ-39 was revealed, with one global higher-order factor and two lower-order factors. The strongest predictor of the QoL in PD was the presence of depression, while motor disability (UPDRS-part III score) additionally contributed to poor QoL. Cognitive impairment has not been correlated with poor QoL. Also, QoL measures were not different between young- (≤50 years) and older-onset PD patients.
The PDQ-39 is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of QoL in Serbian PD patients.
KeywordsQuality of life Parkinson’s disease PDQ-39
This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of Serbia (grant no. 145057).
- 18.Fahn, S., & Elton, R. L. (1987). Unified Parkinson′s disease rating scale. In S. Fahn, C. D. Marsden, M. Goldstein, & D. B. Calne (Eds.), Recent developments in Parkinson′s disease II (pp. 153–163). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
- 20.Schwab, R. S., & England, A. C. (1969). Projection technique for evaluating surgery in Parkinson’s disease. In F. J. Gillingham & I. M. L. Donaldson (Eds.), Third symposium on Parkinson’s disease (pp. 152–157). Edinburgh: Livingstone.Google Scholar
- 22.Jenkinson, C., Fitzpatrick, R., & Peto, V. (1998). The Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire. Use manual for the PDQ-39, PDQ-8 and PDQ Summary Index. Oxford: Health Services Research Unit.Google Scholar
- 23.Jenkinson, C., Wright, L., & Coulter, A. (1993). Quality of life measurement in health care: A review of measures and population norms for the UK SF-36. Oxford: Health Services Research Unit.Google Scholar
- 24.STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7. (2006). Tulsa: StatSoft, Inc.Google Scholar
- 25.Lance, C. E., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2009). Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Received doctrine, verity, and fable in organizational and social research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 28.Auquier, P., Sapin, C., Ziegler, M., et al. (2002). Validation en langue française d’un questionnaire de qualité de vie dans la maladie de Parkinson: Le Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-PDQ-39. Revue Neurologique, 158(4), 1–50.Google Scholar
- 34.Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2007). Social psychology (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar