Reliability and validity of the SF-12v2 in the medical expenditure panel survey
- First Online:
Evaluate the reliability and validity of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form version 2 (SF-12v2) in the 2003–2004 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).
Data were collected in the self-administered mail-out questionnaire and face-to-face interviews of the MEPS (n = 20,661). Internal consistency and test–retest reliability and construct, discriminate, predictive and concurrent validity were tested. The EQ-5D, perceived health and mental health questions were used to test construct and discriminate validity. Self-reported work, physical and cognitive limits tested predictive validity and number of chronic conditions assessed concurrent validity.
Both Mental Component Summary Scores (MCS) and Physical Component Summary Scores (PCS) were shown to have high internal consistency reliability (α > .80). PCS showed high test–retest reliability (ICC = .78) while MCS demonstrated moderate reliability (ICC = .60). PCS had high convergent validity for EQ-5D items (except self-care) and physical health status (r > .56). MCS demonstrated moderate convergent validity on EQ-5D and mental health items (r > .38). PCS distinguish between groups with different physical and work limitations. Similarly, MCS distinguished between groups with and without cognitive limitations. The MCS and PCS showed perfect dose response when variations in scores were examined by participant’s chronic condition status.
Both component scores showed adequate reliability and validity with the 2003–2004 MEPS and should be suitable for use in a variety of proposes within this database.
KeywordsSF-12 MEPS Medical expenditure panel survey Validity Reliability
Agency for healthcare research and quality
Analysis of variance
Brief pain inventory modified for patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 4th
EuroQoL- 5 dimension
Intraclass correlation coefficient
Medical expenditure panel survey
Medical expenditure panel survey household component
Mental component summary score
National center of health statistics
Physical component summary score
Patient generated index
Medical outcomes study 12-item short-form version 1
Medical outcomes study 12-item short-form version 2
Medical outcomes study 36-item short form
- 1.Ware, J., Kosinski, M., Turner-Bowker, D., & Gandek, B. (2002). SF12v2: How to score version 2 of the SF-12 health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualiyMetric Incorporated.Google Scholar
- 3.(2004) Overview of the medical expenditure panel survey, April. Agency for healthcare research and quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/WhatIsMEPS/Overview.HTM#HC. Accessed January 5, 2007.
- 9.Llewellyn, C. D., McGurk, M., & Weinman, J. (2006). Health and neck cancer: To what extent can psychological factors explain differences between health-related quality of life and individual quality of life? The British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 44(5), 351–357. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.06.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar