Quality of Life Research

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 585–595 | Cite as

Measuring stigma across neurological conditions: the development of the stigma scale for chronic illness (SSCI)

  • Deepa Rao
  • Seung W. Choi
  • David Victorson
  • Rita Bode
  • Amy Peterman
  • Allen Heinemann
  • David Cella
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Most measures of stigma are illness specific and do not allow for comparisons across conditions. As part of a study of health-related quality of life for people with neurological disorders, our team developed an instrument to assess the stigma for people with chronic illnesses.

Methods

We based item content on literature review, responses from focus groups, and cognitive interviews. We then administered the items to people with neurological disorders for psychometric testing.

Results

Five hundred eleven participants completed items of the stigma scale. Exploratory factor analysis produced two factors that were highly correlated (r = 0.81). Confirmatory factor analysis produced high standardized loadings on an overall stigma factor (0.68–0.94), with poorer loadings on the two sub-domains (−0.12 to 0.53). These results demonstrated a sufficiently unidimensional scale that corresponded with the bifactor model. Item response theory modeling suggested good model fit, and differential item functioning analyses indicated that the 24-item scale showed potential for measurement equivalence across conditions.

Conclusions

Our efforts produced a stigma scale that had promising psychometric properties. Further study can provide additional information about the SSCI and its benefit in measuring the impact of stigma across conditions.

Keywords

Neurological disorders Measurement Chronic illness Self stigma Enacted stigma 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) contract number HHSN265200423601C. Deepa Rao is supported by a career development award funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH: grant number K23 MH 084551). The authors would like to thank the assistance of Claudia S. Moy in making this study possible, also Paul K. Crane for his psychometric guidance, and Patrick W. Corrigan and Nicolas Rüsch for providing comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon and Schuster, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weiner, B., Perry, R. P., & Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 738–748. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.738.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corrigan, P. W., & Penn, D. L. (1999). Lessons from social psychology on discrediting psychiatric stigma. The American Psychologist, 54(9), 765–776. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.765.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jones, E., Farina, A., Hastorf, A., Markus, H., Miller, D., & Scott, R. (1984). Social stigma the psychology of marked relationships. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rüsch, N., Angermeyer, M., & Corrigan, P. (2005). Mental illness stigma: Concepts, consequences, and initiative to reduce stigma. European Psychiatry, 20(8), 529–539. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2005.04.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sikkema, K., Kalichman, S., Hoffmann, R., Koob, J., Kelly, J., & Heckman, T. (2000). Coping strategies and emotional well-being among HIV-infected men and women experiencing AIDS-related bereavement. AIDS Care, 12(5), 613–624. doi: 10.1080/095401200750003798.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sirey, J. A., Bruce, M. L., Alexopoulos, G. S., Perlick, D. A., Friedman, S. J., & Meyers, B. S. (2001). Stigma as a barrier to recovery: Perceived stigma and patient-rated severity of illness as predictors of antidepressant drug adherence. Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.), 52(12), 1615–1620. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.12.1615.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Corrigan, P., Watson, A., & Barr, L. (2006). The self-stigma of mental illness: Implications for self esteem and self efficacy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(9), 875–884. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2006.25.8.875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2002). The paradox of self-stigma and mental illness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steward, W., Herek, G. M., Ramakrishna, J., Bharat, S., Chandy, S., Wrubel, J., et al. (2008). HIV-related stigma: adapting a theoretical framework for use in India. Social Science and Medicine, 67(8), 1225–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.032.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jacoby, A. (1994). Felt versus enacted stigma: A concept revisited. Social Science and Medicine, 38(2), 269–274. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90396-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Link, B., Yang, L., Phelan, J., & Collins, P. (2004). Measuring mental illness stigma. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(3), 511–541.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Watson, A., Corrigan, P., Larson, J., & Sells, M. (2007). Self-stigma in people with mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 33(6), 1312–1318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berger, B. E., Ferrans, C. E., & Lashley, F. R. (2001). Measuring stigma in people with HIV: Psychometric assessment of the HIV stigma scale. Research in Nursing and Health, 24, 518–529. doi: 10.1002/nur.10011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sayles, J., Hays, R., Sarkisian, C., Mahajan, A., Spritzer, K., & Cunningham, W. (2008). Development and psychometric assessment of a multidimensional measure of internalized HIV stigma in a sample of HIV-positive adults. AIDS and Behavior, 12(5), 748–758.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Brakel, W. H. (2006). Measuring health-related stigma: A literature review. Psychology Health and Medicine, 11(3), 307–334. doi: 10.1080/13548500600595160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nyblade, L. C. (2006). Measuring HIV stigma: Existing knowledge and gaps. Psychology Health and Medicine, 11(3), 335–345. doi: 10.1080/13548500600595178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gagliardi, B. A. (1991). The impact of Duchenne muscular dystrophy on families. Orthopedic Nursing, 10, 41–49. doi: 10.1097/00006416-199109000-00009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weaver, F. M., Giobbie-Hurder, A. G., Hughes, S. L., Smith, G., Kubal, J. D., & Ulasevich, A. (1999). Home medical equipment receipt in a home care appropriate population. Journal of Aging and Health, 11(4), 494–516. doi: 10.1177/089826439901100402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    de Boer, A. G., Wijker, W., Speelman, J. D., & de Haes, J. C. (1996). Quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease: development of a questionnaire. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 61(1), 70–74. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.61.1.70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., & Reeve, B. (2007). The patient reported outcomes measurement informational system (PROMIS) overview and developmental work, 2004–2006. Medical Care, 45(5), S3–S11. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lawrence, J., Fauerbach, J., Heinberg, L., Doctor, M., & Thombs, D. (2006). The reliability and validity of the perceived stigmatization questionnaire (PSQ) and the social comfort questionnaire (SCQ) among an adult burn survivor sample. Psychological Assessment, 18(1), 106–111. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.1.106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cramer, J., Westbrook, L., Devinsky, O., Perrine, K., Glassman, M., & Camfield, C. (1999). Development of the quality of life in epilepsy inventory for adolescents: The QOLIE-AD-48. Epilepsia, 40, 1114–1121. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb00828.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jacoby, A., Baker, G., Smith, D., Dewey, M., Chadwick, D., Jacoby, A., et al. (1993). Measuring the impact of epilepsy: The development of a novel scale. Epilepsy Research, 16(1), 83–88. doi: 10.1016/0920-1211(93)90042-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Loring, D., Larrabee, G., Meador, K., & Lee, G. (2005). Dimensions of the epilepsy foundation concerns index. Epilepsy & Behavior, 6(3), 348–352. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Green, C., Kiebert, G., Murphy, C., Mitchell, J., O′Brien, M., & Burrell, A. (2003). Patients’ health-related quality of life and health state values for motor neurone disease/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Quality of Life Research, 12, 565–574. doi: 10.1023/A:1025052609818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cella, D., Dineen, K., Arnason, B., Reder, A., Webster, K., & Karabatsos, G. (1996). Validation of the functional assessment of multiple sclerosis quality of life instrument. Neurology, 47, 129–139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ford, H., Gerry, E., Tennant, A., Whalley, D., Haigh, R., & Johnson, M. (2001). Developing a disease-specific quality of life measure for people with multiple sclerosis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 15, 247–258. doi: 10.1191/026921501673658108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rotstein, Z., Barak, Y., Noy, S., & Achiron, A. (2000). Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: Development and validation of the ‘RAYS’ scale and comparison with the SF-36. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 12(6), 511–517. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/12.6.511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. A. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(5, Suppl 1), S12–S21. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000254567.79743.e2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Willis, G. B. (1999). Cognitive interviewing: A “how to” guide, from the short course “reducing survey error through research on the cognitive and decision processes in surveys”. Presented at: Meeting of the American Statistical Association; Dallas, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ryan, G., & Bernard, H. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, No. 17.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2003). Further investigation of the performance of S-X2: An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 289–298. doi: 10.1177/0146621603027004004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    LaFrance, W. C., Kanner, A. M., & Hermann, B. (2008). Psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy. International Review of Neurobiology, 83, 347–383. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(08)00020-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Alonso, J., Buron, A., Bruffaerts, R., He, Y., Posada-Villa, J., Lepine, J. P., et al. (2008). Association of perceived stigma and mood and anxiety disorders: Results from the World Mental Health Surveys. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 118(4), 305–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01241.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zubrod, C., Schneiderman, M., & Frei, E. (1960). Appraisal of methods for the study of chemotherapy of cancer in man: Comparative therapeutic trial of nitrogen mustard and triethylene thiophosphoramide. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 11, 7–33. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(60)90137-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1992). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Penfield, R. (2005). DIFAS: Differential item functioning analysis system. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 150. doi: 10.1177/0146621603260686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Perez, L., Huang, J., Jansky, L., Nowinski, C., Victorson, D., Peterman, A., et al. (2007). Using focus groups to inform the Neuro-QOL measurement tool: Exploring patient-centered, health-related quality of life concepts across neurological conditions. The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 39(6), 342–353. doi: 10.1097/01376517-200712000-00005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cattell, R. B. (1966). The screen test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lai, J. S., Crane, P. K., & Cella, D. (2006). Factor analysis techniques for assessing sufficient unidimensionality of cancer related fatigue. Quality of Life Research, 15, 1179–1190. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-0060-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Reise, S., Morizot, J., & Hays, R. (2007). The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Quality of Life Research, 16, 19–31. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deepa Rao
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Seung W. Choi
    • 1
    • 3
  • David Victorson
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rita Bode
    • 4
  • Amy Peterman
    • 5
  • Allen Heinemann
    • 3
    • 4
    • 6
  • David Cella
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Center on Outcomes, Research and Education Evanston Northwestern HealthcareEvanstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Institute for Healthcare StudiesNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  4. 4.Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes ResearchRehabilitation Institute of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  5. 5.Department of PsychologyUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteCharlotteUSA
  6. 6.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations