Health-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting. The impact of a randomised controlled home-based intervention program
- 386 Downloads
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a home based intervention program (HBIP) on health related quality of life (HRQoL) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). To strengthen the clinical interpretation, HRQoL data were compared to the general population.
In a randomised controlled trial (RCT), a total of 185 CABG patients (93 vs 92) completed the study. The intervention group received a HBIP 2 and 4 weeks after surgery. HRQoL was measured by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) in both patient groups before surgery, at 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery.
Significant improvements were found in both groups for the majority of subscales of HRQoL at 6-week and 6-month follow-up. However, these improvements did not differ significantly between the groups. Compared to the general population, significant differences (P < 0.05) were found for the SF-36 subscales: role physical, role emotional and bodily pain.
HRQoL after CABG improved markedly over time, but no significant or clinically important differences were found when compared with controls. Thus, work to further develop and test the effect of a HBIP on HRQoL in patients undergoing rehabilitation following CABG is warranted.
KeywordsCoronary artery bypass grafting Hospital-based home care services Nursing care Quality of life Randomised controlled trial
- 1.Norwegian Association of Cardiothoracic Surgeons. (2006). Heart surgery in Norway 2006. Register of heart surgery. http://www.legeforeningen.no/asset/37733/1/37733_1.ppt#261,1,. Heart surgery in Norway 2006 Norwegian Association of Cardiothoracic Surgeons. Accessed 1 Apr 2008.
- 2.World Health Organisation. (1993). Needs and action priorities in cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention in patients with CHD. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
- 6.Barnason, S., Zimmerman, L., Nieveen, J., Schmaderer, M., Carranza, B., & Reilly, S. (2003). Impact of a home communication intervention for coronary artery bypass graft patients with ischemic heart failure on self-efficacy, coronary disease risk factor modification, and functioning. Heart and Lung, 32(3), 147–158. doi: 10.1016/S0147-9563(03)00036-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Barnason, S., Zimmerman, L., Nieveen, J., & Hertzog, M. (2006). Impact of a telehealth intervention to augment home health care on functional and recovery outcomes of elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart and Lung, 35(4), 225–233. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2005.10.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Oldenburg, B., Martin, A., Greenwood, J., Bernstein, L., & Allan, R. (1995). A controlled trial of a behavioral and educational intervention following coronary artery bypass surgery. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 15(1), 39–46. doi: 10.1097/00008483-199501000-00006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hevey, D., Brown, A., Cahill, A., Newton, H., Kierns, M., & Horgan, J. H. (2003). Four-week multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation produces similar improvements in exercise capacity and quality of life to a 10-week program. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 23(1), 17–21. doi: 10.1097/00008483-200301000-00004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Jolly, K., Taylor, R., Lip, G. Y., Greenfield, S., Raftery, J., Mant, J., et al. (2007). The Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation Study (BRUM). Home-based compared with hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation in a multi-ethnic population: Cost-effectiveness and patient adherence. Health Technology Assessment, 11(35), 1–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Lie, I., Arnesen, H., Sandvik, L., Hamilton, G., & Bunch, E. H. (2007). Effects of a home-based intervention program on anxiety and depression 6 months after coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 62(4), 411–418. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.11.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Hays, R. D. (2005). Generic versus disease-targeted instruments. In R. D. Hays & P. M. Fayers (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials (2nd ed., pp. 3–9). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 16.Ware, J. E., Jr, Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (2000). SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and interpretation guide (2nd ed.). Boston: New England Medical Center.Google Scholar
- 17.Spertus, J. A., Winder, J. A., Dewhurst, T. A., Deyo, R. A., Prodzinski, J., McDonell, M., et al. (1995). Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 25(2), 333–341. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00397-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Ware, J. E., Jr, Kosinski, M., & Dewey, J. (2002). How to score version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey (standard and acute forms) (2nd ed.). Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.Google Scholar
- 19.Falcoz, P. E., Chocron, S., Mercier, M., Puyraveau, M., & Etievent, J. P. (2002). Comparison of the Nottingham health profile and the 36-item health survey questionnaires in cardiac surgery. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 73(4), 1222–1228. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03371-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Lindsay, G. M., Hanlon, P., Smith, L. N., & Wheatley, D. J. (2000). Assessment of changes in general health status using the short-form 36 questionnaire 1 year following coronary artery bypass grafting. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 18(5), 557–564. doi: 10.1016/S1010-7940(00)00542-X.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Jr, Lu, J. F., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1994). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care, 32(1), 40–66. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Zhang, Z., Mahoney, E. M., Stables, R. H., Booth, J., Nugara, F., Spertus, J. A., et al. (2003). Disease-specific health status after stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass surgery: One-year results from the stent or surgery trial. Circulation, 108(14), 1694–1700. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087600.83707.FD.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Conaway, D. G., House, J., Bandt, K., Hayden, L., Borkon, A. M., & Spertus, J. A. (2003). The elderly: Health status benefits and recovery of function one year after coronary artery bypass surgery. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 42(8), 1421–1426. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)01052-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Bjorner, J. B., Wallenstein, G. V., Martin, M. C., Lin, P., Blaisdell-Gross, B., Tak, P. C., et al. (2007). Interpreting score differences in the SF-36 Vitality scale: Using clinical conditions and functional outcomes to define the minimally important difference. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 23(4), 731–739. doi: 10.1185/030079907X178757.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural science (2nd ed.). England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
- 31.Hjermstad, M. J., Fayers, P. M., Bjordal, K., & Kaasa, S. (1998). Using reference data on quality of life—the importance of adjusting for age and gender, exemplified by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3). European Journal of Cancer, 34(9), 1381–1389. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00136-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Borkon, A. M., Muehlebach, G. F., House, J., Marso, S. P., & Spertus, J. A. (2002). A comparison of the recovery of health status after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 74(5), 1526–1530. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04063-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Smith, K. M., Arthur, H. M., McKelvie, R. S., & Kodis, J. (2004). Differences in sustainability of exercise and health-related quality of life outcomes following home or hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, 11(4), 313–319. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000136414.40017.10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.Favarato, M. E., Hueb, W., Boden, W. E., Lopes, N., Nogueira, C. R., Takiuti, M., et al. (2007). Quality of life in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary artery disease: A comparative post hoc analyses of medical, angioplasty or surgical strategies—MASS II trial. International Journal of Cardiology, 116(3), 364–370. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.06.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar