Quality of Life Research

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 157–161

Exploring household income as a predictor of psychological well-being among long-term colorectal cancer survivors

  • J. Jason Lundy
  • Stephen Joel Coons
  • Christopher Wendel
  • Mark C. Hornbrook
  • Lisa Herrinton
  • Marcia Grant
  • Robert S. Krouse
Brief Communication

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this analysis was to determine the unique contribution of household income to the variance explained in psychological well-being (PWB) among a sample of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors.

Methods

This study is a secondary analysis of data collected as part of the Health-Related Quality of Life in Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Survivors Study, which included CRC survivors with (cases) and without (controls) ostomies. The dataset included socio-demographic, health status, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) information. HRQOL was assessed with the modified City of Hope Quality of Life (mCOH-QOL)-Ostomy questionnaire and SF-36v2. To assess the relationship between income and PWB, a hierarchical linear regression model was constructed combining data from both cases and controls.

Results

After accounting for the proportion of variance in PWB explained by the other independent variables in the model, the additional variance explained by income was significant (R2 increased from 0.228 to 0.250; P = 0.006).

Conclusions

Although the study design does not allow causal inference, these results demonstrate a significant relationship between income and PWB in CRC survivors. The findings suggest that for non-randomized group comparisons of HRQOL, income should, at the very least, be included as a control variable in the analysis.

Keywords

Income Psychological well-being Physical well-being Colorectal cancer 

Abbreviations

CRC

Colorectal cancer

SES

Socioeconomic status

mCOH-QOL-Ostomy

Modified City of Hope Quality of Life-Ostomy questionnaire

HRQOL

Health-related quality of life

PCS

SF-36 physical component summary scale

MCS

SF-36 mental component summary scale

PWB

Psychological well-being

References

  1. 1.
    May, J. H., & Cunningham, P. J. (2004). Tough trade-offs: Medical bills, family finances and access to care. Issue Brief (Center for Studying Health System Change), 1–4. Available at http://www.hschange.com/CONTENT/689/. Accessed 28 Dec 2008.
  2. 2.
    Himmelstein, D. U., Warren, E., Thorne, D., et al. (2005). Illness and injury as contributors to bankruptcy. Health Affairs (Project Hope), (Suppl Web Exclusives), W5-63–W65-73.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dranove, D., & Millenson, M. L. (2006). Medical bankruptcy: Myth versus fact. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 25, w74–w83. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.25.w74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ell, K., Xie, B., Wells, A., et al. (2008). Economic stress among low-income women with cancer. Cancer, 112, 616–625. doi:10.1002/cncr.23203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Short, P. F., & Mallonee, E. L. (2006). Income disparities in the quality of life of cancer survivors. Medical Care, 44, 16–23. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000188986.84819.3a.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mariotto, A. B., Yabroff, K. R., Feuer, E. J., et al. (2006). Projecting the number of patients with colorectal carcinoma by phases of care in the US: 2000–2020. Cancer Causes and Control, 17, 1215–1226. doi:10.1007/s10552-006-0072-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Solomon, M. J., Pager, C. K., Keshava, A., et al. (2003). What do patients want? Patient preferences and surrogate decision making in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 46, 1351–1357. doi:10.1007/s10350-004-6749-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pachler, J., & Wille-Jørgensen, P. (2005). Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004323.pub3. (The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004; (3):CD004323.pub3).
  9. 9.
    Adler, N. E., Boyce, T., Chesney, M. A., Folkman, S., & Syme, L. (1993). Socio-economic inequalities and health. Journal of the American Medical Association, 269, 3140–3145. doi:10.1001/jama.269.24.3140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Backlund, E., Sorlie, P. D., & Johnson, N. J. (1996). The shape of the relationship between income and mortality in the United States: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Annals of Epidemiology, 6, 1–9. doi:10.1016/1047-2797(95)00090-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elo, I. T., & Preston, S. H. (1995). Educational differentials in mortality: United States, 1979–85. Social Science and Medicine, 42, 47–57. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00062-3.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hemingway, H., Nicholson, A., & Marmot, M. (1997). The impact of socioeconomic status on health functioning as assessed by the SF-36 Questionnaire: The Whitehall II Study. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1484–1490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lagasse, R., Humbelt, C. P., Lenaerts, A., Godin, I., & Moens, G. F. G. (1990). Health and social inequalities in Belgium. Social Science and Medicine, 31, 237–248. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(90)90270-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wolfson, M., Rowe, G., Gentleman, J. E., & Tomiak, M. (1993). Career earnings and death: A longitudinal analysis of older Canadian men. Journal of Gerontology, 48, S167–S179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carr-Hill, R. (1987). The inequalities in health debate: A critical review of the issues. Journal of Social Policy, 16, 509–542.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilkinson, R. G. (1986). Socio-economic differences in mortality: Interpreting the data on their size and trends. In R. D. Wilkinson (Ed.), Class and health: Research and longitudinal data. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Williams, D. R. (1990). Socioeconomic differentials in health: A review and redirection. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 81–99. doi:10.2307/2786672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Geronimus, A. T., Bound, J., Waidmann, T. A., Hillenmeier, M. M., & Burns, P. B. (1996). Excess mortality among blacks and whites in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine, 335, 1552–1558. doi:10.1056/NEJM199611213352102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bartley, M., & Owen, C. (1996). Relation between socioeconomic status, employment, and health during economic change, 1973–93. British Medical Journal, 313, 445–449.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith, J. P. (1999). Healthy bodies and thick wallets: The dual relation between health and economic status. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(2), 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mohler, M. J., Coons, S. J., Hornbrook, M. C., Herrinton, L. J., Wendel, C. S., Grant, M., et al. (2008). The Health-Related Quality of Life in Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Survivors Study: Objectives, methods and patient sample. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 24, 2059–2070. doi:10.1185/03007990802118360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Deyo, R. A., Cherkin, D. C., & Ciol, M. A. (1992). Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45, 613–619. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grant, M., Ferrell, B., Dean, G., et al. (2004). Revision and psychometric testing of the City of Hope Quality of Life-Ostomy Questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 13, 1445–1457. doi:10.1023/B:QURE.0000040784.65830.9f.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Dewey, J. E. (2000). How to score version two of the SF-36 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krouse, R., Grant, M., Ferrell, B., et al. (2007). Quality of life outcomes in 599 cancer and non-cancer patients with colostomies. The Journal of Surgical Research, 138, 79–87. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2006.04.033.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Krouse, R. S., Mohler, M. J., Wendel, C. S., et al. (2006). The VA Ostomy Health-Related Quality of Life Study: Objectives, methods, and patient sample. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 22, 781–791. doi:10.1185/030079906X96380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483. doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ware, J. E. (2004). SF-36 Health Survey update. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (3rd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 693–718). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Becker, G. (1974). A theory of social interactions. The Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1063–1093. doi:10.1086/260265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Norman, G. R., Sloan, J. A., & Wyrich, K. W. (2003). Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Medical Care, 41, 582–592. doi:10.1097/00005650-200305000-00004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lynch, J. W., Kaplan, G. A., & Shema, S. J. (1997). Cumulative impact of sustained economic hardship on physical, cognitive, psychological, and social functioning. The New England Journal of Medicine, 337, 1889–1895. doi:10.1056/NEJM199712253372606.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Jason Lundy
    • 1
  • Stephen Joel Coons
    • 1
  • Christopher Wendel
    • 2
  • Mark C. Hornbrook
    • 3
  • Lisa Herrinton
    • 4
  • Marcia Grant
    • 5
  • Robert S. Krouse
    • 2
  1. 1.College of PharmacyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care SystemTucsonUSA
  3. 3.Kaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandUSA
  4. 4.Kaiser Permanente Northern CaliforniaOaklandUSA
  5. 5.City of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteUSA

Personalised recommendations