The relative contributions of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, health, and social relationships to life satisfaction in the United States
- First Online:
- 985 Downloads
To evaluate racial/ethnic disparities in life satisfaction and the relative contributions of socioeconomic status (SES; education, income, employment status, wealth), health, and social relationships (social ties, emotional support) to well-being within and across racial/ethnic groups.
In two cross-sectional, representative samples of U.S. adults (the 2001 National Health Interview Survey and the 2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System; combined n > 350,000), we compared life satisfaction across Whites, Hispanics, and Blacks. We also evaluated the extent to which SES, health, and social relationships ‘explained’ racial/ethnic group differences and compared the magnitude of variation explained by life satisfaction determinants across and within these groups.
Relative to Whites, both Blacks and Hispanics were less likely to be very satisfied. Blacks were somewhat more likely to report being dissatisfied. These differences were reduced or eliminated with adjustment for SES, health, and social relationships. Together, SES and health explained 12–15% of the variation in life satisfaction, whereas social relationships explained an additional 10–12% of the variance.
Racial/ethnic life satisfaction disparities exist for Blacks and Hispanics, and these differences are largest when comparing those reporting being ‘satisfied’ to ‘very satisfied’ versus ‘dissatisfied’ to ‘satisfied.’ SES, health, and social relationships were consistently associated with life satisfaction, with emotional support having the strongest association with life satisfaction.
KeywordsQuality of life Health status disparities Hispanics Blacks Social support Socioeconomic status
- 1.World Health Organization. (2005). Promoting mental health: Concepts, emerging evidence, practice. World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse in collaboration with the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation and the University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
- 2.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Healthy People 2010: Understanding and improving health (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- 6.U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). Hispanics in the United States. Available online at: http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hispanic/hispanic_pop_presentation.html.
- 12.Bishop, A. J., Martin, P., & Poon, L. (2006). Happiness and congruence in older adulthood: A structural model of life satisfaction. Aging & Mental Health, 10, 445–453.Google Scholar
- 17.Uchino, B. N. (2004). Pathways linking social support to health outcomes. In B. N. Uchino (Ed.), Social support and physical health: Understanding the health consequences of our relationships (pp. 109–144). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- 18.National Center for Health Statistics (2008). National Health Interview Survey (description). Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhis/hisdesc.htm.
- 19.National Center for Health Statistics. (2003). National Health Interview Survey. Data file documentation, National Health Interview Survey, 2001 (machine readable data file and documentation). Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
- 20.National Center for Health Statistics. (2003). 2001 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Public use data release. NHIS Survey description. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
- 21.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). Health risks in the United States: Behavioral risk factor surveillance system (At a glance). Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/publications/aag/pdf/brfss.pdf.
- 22.Centers for Disease Control, Prevention. (2008). 2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Summary data quality report. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
- 23.Office of Management and Budget. (1997). Recommendations from the Interagency Committee for the Review of the Racial and Ethnic Standards to the Office of Management and Budget Concerning Changes to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity. Federal Register, 62, 36873–36946.Google Scholar
- 24.National Research Council. (2004). Understanding racial and ethnic differences in health in late life: A research agenda. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- 25.Korn, E. L., & Graubard, B. I. (1999). Analysis of health surveys. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 34.Eng, P. M., Rimm, E. B., Fitzmaurice, G., & Kawachi, I. (2002). Social ties and change in social ties in relation to subsequent total and cause-specific mortality and coronary heart disease incidence in men. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155, 700–709. doi:10.1093/aje/155.8.700.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Marmot, M. (2004). The status syndrome: How social standing affects our health and longevity. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
- 37.Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- 44.Subramanian, S. V., Kim, D., & Kawachi, I. (2005). Covariation in the socioeconomic determinants of self rated health and happiness: A multivariate multilevel analysis of individuals and communities in the USA. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 664–669. doi:10.1136/jech.2004.025742.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Ryff, C. D., Keyes, C. L. M., & Hughes, D. L. (2004). Psychological well-being in MIDUS: Profiles of ethnic/racial diversity and life-course uniformity. In O. G. Brim, C. D. Ryff, & R. C. Kessler (Eds.), How healthy are we? A national study of well-being at midlife (pp. 398–424). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar