Prospects and challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice
Patient-reported measures include preferences and reports about care received, health behaviors, and outcomes of care (patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life). These measures are a core aspect of health care, but there is much to be learned about how to use them to improve clinical practice.
We specify linkages among different patient-reported measures and focus upon the prospects and challenges for use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice.
Patient-reported measures are important throughout the continuum of patient care. At the initial visit, patient-reported outcomes provide information about what is important to the patient, the patient’s current behaviors, and the patient’s baseline health-related quality of life. At subsequent visits, patient-reported outcomes help evaluate disease progression or regression as well as treatment effects.
Patient-reported measures can help clinicians target interventions that will improve patient outcomes of care. However, there are a number of challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice.
KeywordsQuality of life Quality indicators, health care Outcome assessment, health care
- 1.The Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS). (2008). National Committee for Quality Assurance. Available from: http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/59/Default.aspx. Accessed 17 March 2008.
- 2.Department of Veterans Affairs. (2001). External Peer Review Program. VHA Directive 2001-015. Available from: http://www1.va.gov/VHAPUBLICATIONS/ViewPublication.asp?pub_ID=103. Accessed 17 March 2008.
- 4.Food and Drug Administration. (2006). Guidance for industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/06d-0044-gdl0001.pdf. Accessed 17 March 2008.
- 6.Mauksch, L. B., Dugdale, D. C., Dodson, S., & Epstein, R. (2008). Relationship, communication, and efficiency in the medical encounter: Creating a clinical model from a literature review. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168(13), 1387–1395. doi:10.1001/archinte.168.13.1387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., Brown, P. M., Lynch, P., Brown, J. M., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 714–724. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.06.078.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., Wever, L. D., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002). Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient–physician communication: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(23), 3027. doi:10.1001/jama.288.23.3027.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Cabana, M. D., Rand, C. S., Powe, N. R., Wu, A. W., Wilson, M. H., Abboud, P. A., et al. (1999). Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282(15), 1458–1465. doi:10.1001/jama.282.15.1458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Fihn, S. D., McDonell, M. B., Diehr, P., Anderson, S. M., Bradley, K. A., Au, D. H., et al. (2004). Effects of sustained audit/feedback on self-reported health status of primary care patients. The American Journal of Medicine, 116(4), 241–248. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.10.026.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Calkins, D. R., Rubenstein, L. V., Cleary, P. D., Davies, A. R., Jette, A. M., Fink, A., et al. (1994). Functional disability screening of ambulatory patients: A randomized controlled trial in a hospital-based group practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 9(10), 590–592. doi:10.1007/BF02599291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Nelson, E. C., Wasson, J. H., Johnson, D. J., & Hays, R. D. (1996). Dartmouth COOP functional health assessment charts: Brief measures for clinical practice. Available from: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~coopproj/more_charts.html. Accessed 17 March 2008.
- 34.Hemingway, H., Stafford, M., Stansfeld, S., Shipley, M., & Marmot, M. (1997). Is the SF-36 a valid measure of change in population health? Results from the Whitehall II Study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 315(7118), 1273–1279.Google Scholar