Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 16, Issue 9, pp 1547–1553 | Cite as

Deteriorating health status in Stockholm 1998–2002: results from repeated population surveys using the EQ-5D

  • Kristina Burström
  • Magnus Johannesson
  • Clas Rehnberg
Article

Abstract

Rationale, aim and methodology

In order to measure the change in health status in Sweden, the generic health-related quality of life instrument, the EQ-5D, was included in the 1998 (n = 4,950) and 2002 (n = 49,914) cross-sectional postal Public Health Surveys, a representative sample (21–84 years) of the Stockholm County population, with response rates about 63% in both years. The EQ-5D provides data on five dimensions of health as well as an overall index value (1 = full health; 0 = dead).

Results

Over time the health index decreased statistically significantly from 0.858 to 0.841 for men and from 0.833 to 0.797 for women. Women had significantly more health problems in 2002 in four out of the five dimensions, with the largest increase in the dimensions anxiety/depression (33–43%) and pain/discomfort (47–53%). The health index was significantly lower in all age-groups for women. Men had significantly more health problems 2002 in two dimensions, and the largest increase in anxiety/depression (24–31%). The health index decreased significantly over time for younger men.

Conclusion

The observed deterioration in health status over time gives reason for concern. Investigation of reasons for the declining health status should be a research priority.

Keywords

EQ-5D Health-related quality of life Health status index Health surveys Health trends 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Stockholm County Council. We would like to thank Stockholm Centre of Public Health for conducting this study. All helpful comments on an earlier version of this article at a EuroQol Scientific Meeting are gratefully acknowledged. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

References

  1. 1.
    Rabin, R., & de Charro, F. (2001). EQ-5D: A measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Annals of Medicine, 33, 337–343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35, 1095–1108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kind, P., Dolan, P., Gudex, C., & Williams, A. (1998). Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal, 316, 736–741.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burstrom, K., Johannesson, M., & Diderichsen, F. (2001). Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Quality of Life Research, 10, 621–635.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Szende A, & Williams A, (Eds.). (2004). Measuring self-reported population health: An international perspective based on the EQ-5D. Rotterdam: EuroQol Group.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drummond, M. F., O’Brien, B., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2005). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. C. (Eds.). (1996). Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meunning, P. A., & Gold, M. S. (2001). Using the years-of-healthy-life measure to calculate QALYs. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20, 35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    SAS Institute Inc. (2000). SAS/STAT Software: User’s Guide, Version 8. 2nd edn. Cary NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bowling, A. (1995). Measuring disease. Buckingham: Open University press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mossey, J. M., & Shapiro, E. (1982). Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly. American Journal of Public Health, 72, 800–808.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 38, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burström, B., & Fredlund, P. (2001). Self rated health: Is it a good predictor of subsequent mortality among adults in lower as well as in higher social classes? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55, 836–840.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    The National Board of Health and Welfare. (2005). Folkhälsorapport 2005. [Public Health Report 2005]. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare. (In Swedish).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sobocki, P., Lekander, I., Borgstrom, F., & Strom, O et al. (2007). The economic burden of depression in Sweden 1997–2005. European Psychiatry, 22(3), 146–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    The Social Insurance Office. (2005). Sjukersättning och aktivitetsersättning utbetalade i december 2003 och 2004. Statistik 2005:5. [Sickness and activity compensation paid in December 2003 and 2004. Statistics 2005:5]. Stockholm: The Social Insurance Office. (In Swedish).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stockholm County Council. (2006). Behov av hälso- och sjukvård i Stockholms län utifrån ett befolkningsperspektiv. [Need for health care in Stockholm County based on a population perspektive]. Stockholm: Stockholm County Council, Central Healthcare Purchaser. (In Swedish).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burstrom, K., Johannesson, M., & Diderichsen, F. (2003). The value of the change in health in Sweden 1980/81 to 1996/97. Health Economics, 12, 637–654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stockholm County Council (2002). Årsstatistik 2000–2004 för Stockholms län och landsting. [Statistics 2000–2004 on the Stockholm region]. Stockholm: Stockholm County Council, The office of regional planning and urban transportation. (In Swedish).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walters, S. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2005). Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1523–1532.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sullivan, P. W., Lawrence, W. F., & Ghushchyan, V. (2005). A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Medical Care, 43, 736–749.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cutler, D. M., & Richardson, E. (1998). The value of health: 1970–1990. American Economic Review Papers Proceedings, 88, 97–100.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Whitehead, M., Scott-Samuel, A., & Dahlgren, G. (1998). Setting targets to address inequalities in health. Lancet, 351, 1279–1282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Swedish National Committee for Public Health. (2001). Health on equal terms––national goals for public health. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 57, 1–68.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    The Swedish Government. (2002). Mål för folkhälsan. [National Goals for Public Health]. Stockholm: Elanders Gotab, (Government Bill 2002/03:35). (In Swedish).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristina Burström
    • 1
  • Magnus Johannesson
    • 2
  • Clas Rehnberg
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Social MedicineKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Centre for Health EconomicsStockholm School of EconomicsStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of Medical Management CentreKarolinska Institutet StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations