Quality of Life Research

, Volume 16, Issue 8, pp 1335–1345

Testing the structural and cross-cultural validity of the KIDSCREEN-27 quality of life questionnaire

  • Stephane Robitail
  • Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer
  • Marie-Claude Simeoni
  • Luis Rajmil
  • Jeanet Bruil
  • Mick Power
  • Wolfgang Duer
  • Bernhard Cloetta
  • Ladislav Czemy
  • Joanna Mazur
  • Agnes Czimbalmos
  • Yannis Tountas
  • Curt Hagquist
  • Jean Kilroe
  • Pascal Auquier
  • the KIDSCREEN Group
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9241-1

Cite this article as:
Robitail, S., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Simeoni, MC. et al. Qual Life Res (2007) 16: 1335. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9241-1

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study is to assess the structural and cross-cultural validity of the KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaire.

Methods

The 27-item version of the KIDSCREEN instrument was derived from a longer 52-item version and was administered to young people aged 8–18 years in 13 European countries in a cross-sectional survey. Structural and cross-cultural validity were tested using multitrait multi-item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and Rasch analyses. Zumbo’s logistic regression method was applied to assess differential item functioning (DIF) across countries. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha.

Results

Responses were obtained from n = 22,827 respondents (response rate 68.9%). For the combined sample from all countries, exploratory factor analysis with procrustean rotations revealed a five-factor structure which explained 56.9% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated an acceptable model fit (RMSEA = 0.068, CFI = 0.960). The unidimensionality of all dimensions was confirmed (INFIT: 0.81–1.15). Differential item functioning (DIF) results across the 13 countries showed that 5 items presented uniform DIF whereas 10 displayed non-uniform DIF. Reliability was acceptable (Cronbach’s α = 0.78–0.84 for individual dimensions).

Conclusions

There was substantial evidence for the cross-cultural equivalence of the KIDSCREEN-27 across the countries studied and the factor structure was highly replicable in individual countries. Further research is needed to correct scores based on DIF results. The KIDSCREEN-27 is a new short and promising tool for use in clinical and epidemiological studies.

Keywords

Cross-cultural equivalence Health-related Quality of Life Item response theory Pediatric Questionnaire 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephane Robitail
    • 1
  • Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer
    • 2
  • Marie-Claude Simeoni
    • 1
  • Luis Rajmil
    • 3
  • Jeanet Bruil
    • 4
  • Mick Power
    • 5
  • Wolfgang Duer
    • 6
  • Bernhard Cloetta
    • 7
  • Ladislav Czemy
    • 8
  • Joanna Mazur
    • 9
  • Agnes Czimbalmos
    • 10
  • Yannis Tountas
    • 11
  • Curt Hagquist
    • 12
  • Jean Kilroe
    • 13
  • Pascal Auquier
    • 1
    • 14
    • 15
  • the KIDSCREEN Group
  1. 1.EA 3279, School of MedicinePerceived Health Research UnitMarseilleFrance
  2. 2.School of Public Health, WHO Collaborating Center for Child and Adolescent Health PromotionUniversity of BielefeldBielefeldGermany
  3. 3.Agency for QualityResearch and Assessment in Health (AQuRAHealth)BarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Child Health Unit, Prevention and Physical ActivityTNO Quality of LifeLeidenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh HospitalEdinburghScotland
  6. 6.Ludwig Boltzmann-Institute for Sociology of Health and MedicineUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  7. 7.Unit for Health Research, Institute for Social and Preventive MedicineUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  8. 8.Prague Psychiatric CenterPragueCzech Republic
  9. 9.Department of EpidemiologyNational Research Institute of Mother & ChildWarsawPoland
  10. 10.Health Promotion and DevelopmentCentre Child Health DepartmentBudapestHungary
  11. 11.Centre for Health Services Research and Hellenic Society for Health Promotion and EducationAthensGreece
  12. 12.Karlstad UniversityKarlstadSweden
  13. 13.HSEProgramme of Action for ChildrenDublinIreland
  14. 14.Service de Santé Publique. Faculté de MédecineMarseille France
  15. 15.Department of Public HealthTimone University HospitalMarseillesFrance

Personalised recommendations