Quality of Life Research

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 881–893 | Cite as

Field testing of a European quality of life instrument for children and adolescents with chronic conditions: the 37-item DISABKIDS Chronic Generic Module

  • Marie-Claude Simeoni
  • Silke Schmidt
  • Holger Muehlan
  • David Debensason
  • Monika Bullinger
  • DISABKIDS Group
Original Paper

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to shorten the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) DISABKIDS Chronic Generic Measure (DCGM) for children and adolescents and to test its reliability, construct, and external validity. Study design 1153 children and adolescents (8–16 years) with chronic health conditions (asthma, arthritis, epilepsy, cerebral palsy, diabetes, atopic dermatitis, cystic fibrosis) and their family were recruited from different paediatric clinical settings in seven European countries. A two-time assessment comprised reports on sociodemographics, health status and HRQL of children/adolescents. Results The 37-item DCGM describes six dimensions (Independence, Physical Limitation, Emotion, Social Inclusion, Social Exclusion and Treatment) confirmed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis, multi-item scaling and item-goodness of fit to Rasch model. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.70–0.87) and test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.71–0.83) were satisfactory. Correlations between DCGM-37 and other HRQL instruments were the highest between dimensions evaluating similar concepts. Regarding discriminant validity of the DCGM-37, girls and older adolescents reported lower emotional we ll-being. Children belonging to families with low level of affluence and those with severe health conditions were found to have worse HRQL in all domains. Conculsion Reliability, construct validity as well as convergent and discriminant validity of the DCGM-37 were shown.

Keywords

Children Chronic diseases Cross-cultural Instrument validation Quality of life 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The DISABKIDS project was supported by the European Commission (QLG5-CT-2000-00716) within the Fifth Framework Program “Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources”.

References

  1. 1.
    Eiser, C., & Morse, R. (2001). A review of measures of quality of life for children with chronic illnesses. Archieves of Disease in Childhood, 84, 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eiser, C., & Morse, R. (2001) Quality of life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technology Assessment, 5, 1–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bullinger, M., Anderson, R., Cella, D., & Aaronson, N. (1995). Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models. In S. A. Shumaker, R. A. Berzon (Eds.), The international assessment of Health-related quality of life. (pp. 83–91). New York: Oxford Rapid Communications.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bullinger, M., Schmidt, S., Petersen, C., & DISABKIDS Group. (2002). Assessing quality of life of children with chronic health conditions and disabilities: A European approach. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 25, 197–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Skevington, S. M., Sartorius, N., & Amir, M. (2004). Developing methods for assessing quality of life in different cultural settings. The history of the WHOQOL instruments. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simeoni, M. C., Debensason, D., Robitail S., et al. (2004). Agreement between youth and parent across seven European Countries: The DISABKIDS proxy quality of life research intrument. Quality of Life Research, 13(9), 1571.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The European DISABKIDS Group. (2006). The DISABKIDS questionnaires: Quality of life questionnaires for children with chronic conditions. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1417–1432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petersen, C., Schmidt, S., Power, M., et al. (2005). Development and pilot-testing of a health-related quality of life chronic generic module for children and adolescents with chronic health conditions: a European perspective. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1065–1077.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Currie, C. E., Elton, R. A., Todd, J., & Platt, S. (1997). Indicators of socio-economic status for adolescents: The WHO Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey. Health Education Research, 12, 385–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ellert, U., Thomas, C., Ravens-Sieberer, U., et al. (2001). Using item response theory to improve QoL measures for children—first results from the child dynamic health assessment project. Quality of Life Research, 10, 203Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Varni, J. W., Birwinkle, T. M., Seid, M., & Skarr, D. (2003). The PedsQL 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: Feasability, reliability, and validity. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 3, 329–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sapin, C., Simeoni, M. C., El Khammar, M., et al. (2005). Reliability and validity of the VSP-A, a Health-related Quality of Life instrument for ill and healthy adolescents. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 36(4), 327–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Bullinger, M. (1998). Assessing health-related quality of life in chronically ill children with the German KINDL: First psychometric and content analytical results. Quality of Life Research, 7, 399–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stein, R. E. K., & Jessop, D. J. (1990). Functional Status II(R): A measure of child health status. Medical Care, 28, 1041–1055.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Achenbach, T. M., & Ruffle, T. M. (2000). The Child Behavior Checklist and related forms for assessing behavioral/emotional problems and competencies. Pediatrics in Review, 21(8), 265–271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goodman, R., & Scott, S. (1999). Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist: Is small beautiful? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27(1), 17–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    The WHOQOL group (1995). The World Health Organization Qualiy of Life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1403–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design: Rasch Measurement. Chicago: MESA press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi-trait multi-method matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Adamantios, D., & Judy, A. S. (2001). Introducing LISREL. London: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & Mc Donald, R. P. (1998). Goodness of fit Indexes in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995) Evaluating model fit. In: Hoyle R. H (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. (pp. 76–99). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. R. (1994). Psychometric theory, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Riley, A. W., Forrest, C. B., Starfield, B., et al. (2004). The parent report form of the CHIP-Child Edition: Reliability and validity. Medical Care, 42(3), 210–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Goodman, E., Amick, B. C., Rezendes, M. O., et al. (1997). Influences of gender and social class on adolescents’ perceptions of health. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 151, 899–904.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Starfield, B., Riley, A. W., Witt, W. P., et al. (2002). Social class gradients in health during adolescence. Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 354–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rajmil, L., Serra-Sutton, V., Alonso, J., Herdman, M., Riley, A., & Starfield, B. (2003). Validity of the Child Health and Illness Profile-Adolescent Edition (CHIP-AE). Medical Care, 41(10), 1153–1163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ware, J. E., Harris, W. J., Gandek, B., et al. (1997). MAP-R for Windows: Multitrait/Multi-Item Analysis Program-Revised User’s Guide. Boston MA: Health Assessment Lab.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    LISREL 8.51. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc. 2001. SPSS for Windows, Rel. 11.0.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 1999.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Linacre, M. J., & Wright, B. D. (1998). A user’s guide to inSteps, Rasch-Model computer programs. Chicago: MESA Press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rajmil, L., Herdman, M., Fernandez de Sanmamed, M.J., et al. (2004) Generic health-related quality of life instruments in children and adolescents: A qualitative analysis of content. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 34(1), 37–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chan, K. S., Mangione-Smith, R., Burwinkle, T. M., et al. (2005). The PedsQLTM: Reliability and validity of the short-form generic core scales and asthma module. Medicine Care 43(3), 256–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Aaronson, N. K., Cull, A. M., Kaaser, S., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (1996). The European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC)—Modular approach to quality of life assessment in oncology: An update. In: B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, 2 ed. (pp. 179–190). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pedhazur, E. J., & Pedhazur-Schmelkin, L. (1991). Measurement, design and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1989). Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Coste, J., Guillemin, F., Pouchot, J., & Fermanian, J. (1997). Methodological approaches to shortening composite measurement scales. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 247–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Prieto, L., Alonso, J., & Lamarca, R. (2003). Classical test theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1(1), 27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Smith, G. T., & McCarthy, D. M. (1995). Methodological considerations in the refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 300–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form develoment. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Landgraf, J. M., Maunsell, E., Speechley, K. N., et al. (1998). Canadian-French, German and UK versions of the Child Health Questionnaire: Methodology and preliminary item scaling results. Quality of Life Research, 7, 433–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sawyer, M. G., Reynolds, K. E., Couper, J. J., et al. (2005). A two-year prospective study of health-related quality of life of children with chronic illness-the parents’ perspective. Quality of Life Research, 14(2), 395–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Raat, H., Bueving, H. J., de Jongste, J. C., et al. (2005). Responsiveness, longitudinal- and cross-sectional construct validity od the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ) in Dutch children with asthma. Quality of Life Research, 14(1), 265–272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Okelo, S. O., Wu, A. W., Krishnan, J. A., et al. (2004). Emotional quality of life and outcomes in adolescents with asthma. The Journal of Pediatrics, 145(4), 523–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sawyer, M. G., Reynolds, K. E., Couper, J. J., et al. (2004). Health-related quality of life of children and adolescents with chronic illness—a two-year prospective study. Quality of Life Research, 13(7), 1309–1319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Anastasi, A. (1986) Evolving concepts of test validation. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Schmidt, S., Debensason, D., Mühlan, H., et al. (2006). The DISABKIDS chronic generic QoL instrument: Field test results of a clinical study in children with chronic health conditions from a cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 587–598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie-Claude Simeoni
    • 1
    • 3
  • Silke Schmidt
    • 2
  • Holger Muehlan
    • 2
  • David Debensason
    • 1
  • Monika Bullinger
    • 2
  • DISABKIDS Group
    • 1
  1. 1.Public Health DepartmentUniversity Hospital of MarseilleMarseilleFrance
  2. 2.Center of Psychosocial MedicineUniversity Hospital of HamburgHamburgGermany
  3. 3.Faculté de médecineLaboratoire de santé publiqueMarseille cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations