Parent-proxy and child self-reported health-related quality of life: using qualitative methods to explain the discordance
- 693 Downloads
Although parent-proxy reports of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are only moderately correlated with child reported HRQOL, it remains unknown why these scores differ. The aim of this study was to use a qualitative methodology to examine why parents and children report different levels of HRQOL.
The sample consisted of 15 parent–child pairs. A think-aloud technique was used where parents and children were given a generic HRQOL instrument (KIDSCREEN) and instructed to share their thoughts with the interviewer. Qualitative analyses were conducted to assess whether parents and children base their answer on different experiences or reasoning, have different response styles, or interpret the items differently.
There was discordance between parents and children, in terms of rating scale and in terms of the reasoning for their answer. Children tended to have different response styles to parents, where for example, children tended to provide extreme scores (highest or lowest score) and base their response on one single example, more than parents. Parents and children interpreted the meaning of the items very similarly.
This study provides evidence to suggest that discordance among parent-child pairs on KIDSCREEN scores may be as a result of different reasoning and different response styles, rather than interpretation of items. These findings have important implications when parent-proxy reported HRQOL is used to guide clinical/treatment decisions.
KeywordsChild self-reports Health-related quality of life Parent-proxy reports
Health-related quality of life
Quality of life
We would like to extend our gratitude to the parents and children who were involved in the participation of this study, as well as Deakin University for funding the study. We would also like to acknowledge two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
- 5.Brunner, H. I., Klein-Gitelman, M. S., Miller, M. J., Trombley, M., Baldwin, N., Kress, A., Johnson, A. L., Barron, A. C., Griffin, T. A., Passo, M.H., & Lovell, D. J. (2004). Health of children with chronic arthritis: Relationship of different measures and the quality of parent proxy reporting. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 51, 763–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Forsyth, B. H., & Lessler, J. T., (1991). Cognitive laboratory methods: A taxonomy. In P. P. Biener et al., (Eds.), Measurement errors in surveys (pp. 393–418). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
- 14.Graham P., Stevenson J., & Flynn, D. (1997). A new measure of health-related quality of life for children: preliminary findings. Psychology and Health, 12, 655–665Google Scholar
- 15.Herdam, M., Rajmil, L., Ravens-Sieberer, U., Bullinger, M., Power, M., & Alonso, J. (2002). Expert consensus in the development of a European health-related quality of life measure for children and adolescents: A Delphi study. Acta Paediatrica, 91, 1385–1390Google Scholar
- 16.Hunt, S. M. (1999). Cross-cultural issues in the use of quality of life measures in randomized controlled trials. In M. J. Staquet, R. M. Hays, & P. M. Fayers, (Eds.), Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: Methods and practice (pp 51–68). Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- 18.Jokovic, A., Locker, D., & Guyatt, G. (2004). How well do parents know their children? Implications for proxy reporting of child health-related quality of life. Quality Of Life Research: An International Journal Of Quality Of Life Aspects Of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 13, 1297–1307Google Scholar
- 23.Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park: SageGoogle Scholar
- 25.Mayan, M. J. (2001). An introduction to qualitative methods: A training module for students and professionals. Alberta, Canada: Qual International PressGoogle Scholar
- 26.Morse, J.M., & Richards, L. (2002). README FIRST: for a users guide to qualitative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
- 28.Ravens-Sieberer, U., Gosch, A., Abel, T., Auquier, P., Bellach, B. M., Dur, W., & Rajmil, L., the European KIDSCREEN Group (2001). Quality of life in children and adolescents: an European public health perspective. Social and Preventive Medicine, 46, 297–302Google Scholar
- 29.Ravens-Sieberer, U., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Erhart, M., Bruil, J., Duer, W., Auquier, P., Power, M., Abel, T., Czemy, L., Mazur, J., Czimbalmos, A., Tountas, Y., Hagquist, C., & Kilroe, J. (2005). KIDSCREEN-52 quality-of-life measure for children and adolescents. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 5, 353–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Ravens-Sieberer, U., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Erhart, M., Bruil, J., Duer, W., Auquier, P., Power, M., Abel, T., Czemy, L., Mazur, J., Czimbalmos, A., Tountas, Y., Hagquist, C., & Kilroe, J. (2005). KIDSCREEN-52 quality-of-life measure for children and adolescents. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 5, 353–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Schipper, H., Clinch, J., & Olweny, C. (eds.) (1996). Quality of life studies: Definitions and conceptual issues. Lippincott-Raven: New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 38.Vogels, T., Verrips, G. W., Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P., Fekkes, M., Kamphuis, R. P., Koopman, H. M., Theunissen, N. M., & Wit, J. M. (1998). Measuring health-related quality of life in children: the development of the TACQOL parent form. Quality of Life Research, 7, 457–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.von Rueden, U., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Bisegger, C., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2006). Socioeconomic determinants of health related quality of life in childhood and adolescence: Results from a European study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 130–135Google Scholar
- 40.Waters, E. (2000). Association and agreement between adolescent and parent reports of health and wellbeing in an epidemiological health survey. Australian Epidemiologist, 7.4, 19Google Scholar