What drives older women’s perceptions of health-related quality of life?
- First Online:
Age-related differences in the way ratings of health related quality of life (HRQL) are produced are poorly understood, especially for older women.
To examine age differences in critical dimensions of HRQL among older women using structural equation modelling. We hypothesized that physical, mental and social health domains would exert weaker total effects on HRQL among older middle-aged versus much older women.
A model of HRQL was developed and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the structure of the model across two samples of community-dwelling women aged 55 years and older. The relationships between the constructs and the relative magnitude of direct and indirect effects on HRQL were evaluated in a series of path models, with women younger and older than age 70 tested separately.
The CFA model of HRQL showed excellent fit in both the national and verification samples (RMSEA 0.04 and 0.02 respectively). In the path model, the total effects of physical, mental and social health on general perceptions of HRQL were greater and more significant in middle-aged versus older women (beta coefficients 0.810, 0.277, 0.266, all P < 0.05 versus, 0.700, 0.189, and 0.057, P < 0.05 for physical and mental health only respectively).
This HRQL model suggests different opportunities for intervention among older women to improve the outcomes along the path to HRQL.
KeywordsHealth related quality of life Older women Health ICF Structural equation modelling
- 3.International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. (2002). Beginner’s guide. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
- 6.Jans, L., & Stoddard, S. (1999). Chartbook on women and disability in the United States. An InfoUse Report. Washington, DC: U.S. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.Google Scholar
- 8.Newman, A. B. (1999) Cognition and frailty in older women: Socioeconomic and physiologic influences. In R. B. Ness & L. H. Kuller (Eds.), Health and disease among women: Biological and environmental influences (pp. 86–11). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 11.Ware, J. E. Jr., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.Google Scholar
- 13.Aaronson, N. K., Muller, M., Cohen, P. D. A., Essink-Bot, M. L., Fekkes, M., Sanderman, R. et al. (1989). Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1055–068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Idler, E. L. (2003). Discussion: Gender differences in self-rated health in mortality and in the relationship between the two. The Gerontologist, 43, 372–75.Google Scholar
- 17.Helmer, C., Barberger-Gateau, P., Letenneur, L., & Dartigues, J. F. (1999). Subjective health and mortality in French elderly women and men. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B. Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54, S84–S92.Google Scholar
- 22.Turk-Charles, S., Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2003). Aging and emotional memory: The forgettable nature of negative images for older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 132, 310–24.Google Scholar
- 29.Mayo, N. E., Goldberg, M., & Kind, P. (1997). Performance of the Euroqol EQ-5D in a Canadian population. Discussion paper, EuroQol plenary meeting Rotterdam, 2– October 1997.Google Scholar
- 30.Kind, P. (1996). The EurolQol Instrument: An index of health-related quality of life. In Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Ed: Spilker B. Lippincott-Raven.Google Scholar
- 31.Keller, S. D., Ware, J. E., Bentler, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Alonso, J., Apolone, G., et al. (1998). Use of structural equation modeling to test the construct validity of the SF-36 health survey in ten countries: Results from the IQOLA Project. Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Finch, E., Brooks, D., Stratford, P. W., & Mayo, N. E. (Eds). (2002). Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: A guide to enhanced clinical decision making (2nd ed.). Canadian Physiotherapy Association.Google Scholar
- 36.Keller, H. H., McKenzie, J. D., & Goy, R. E. (2001). Construct validation and test-retest reliability of the seniors in the community: Risk evaluation for eating and nutrition questionnaire. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A. Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 56A, M552–M558.Google Scholar
- 37.Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- 38.Hayduk L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- 39.Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling : Concepts, issues, and application. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- 40.Kaplan, D. (1955). Structural equation modeling : Foundations and extensions. Thosand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- 41.Bollen K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 42.Brown, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural models. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- 44.Jöreskog K. G., & Sörbom D. (1996). LISREL 8 user’s reference guide. Illinois: Scientific Software International Inc.Google Scholar