Advertisement

The Affectometer 2: a measure of positive mental health in UK populations

  • Ruth Tennant
  • Stephen Joseph
  • Sarah Stewart-Brown
Original Paper

Abstract

Objective

To validate Affectometer 2 for use in the UK, derive population norms and assess its potential for monitoring positive mental health.

Methods

722 adults aged 16–4 living in Scotland completed Affectometer 2 and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and provided data on socio-economic factors known to be associated with mental health status. Principal component analysis was used to explore the underlying structure of Affectometer 2. Internal reliability was tested using Cronbach’s alpha. Construct validity was tested by comparing associations between Affectometer 2 scores and socio-economic factors with expected performance from other surveys and with the GHQ.

Results

89% of participants completed Affectometer 2 suggesting a high level of public acceptability. Both total scale and subscales showed a high level of internal consistency (0.944). Correlations between Affectometer 2 score and key socio-economic variables were consistent with the findings of other population mental health surveys. Correlation with the GHQ was moderate (0.60). Affectometer 2 did not show a ceiling effect in this general population sample. Principal component analysis provided some evidence consistent with a single underlying construct, although this needs further testing.

Conclusions

Affectometer 2 met accepted criteria for validity and reliability in this representative UK population and demonstrated potential for use in monitoring positive mental health. The results provide support for the development of a shortened version of the scale which would be advantageous for population surveys.

Keywords

Mental health Validation study Population norms 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Permission to use the scale was granted by Dr. Ross Flett. Data was collected by BMRB International on behalf of the Health Education Board for Scotland. Thanks to those who gave of their time completing the scale.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organisation Promoting Mental Health (2004). Concepts emerging evidence and practice. Summary report. Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organisation (2001). Strengthening mental health promotion. Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potential: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 141–66.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldberg, D. P., & Williams, P. (1988). A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 73(3), 539–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huppert, F. A., & Whittington, J. E. (2003). Evidence for the independence of positive and negative well-being: implications for quality of life. British Journal of Health Psychology 18(1), 107–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Department of Health (2006). Our health, our care, our say: a new direction for community services. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Commission Promoting the mental health of the population (2005). Towards a strategy on mental health for the EU COM (2005) 484. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Department of Health (2004). Choosing Health: making healthy choices easier. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stewart-Brown, S. (2002). Measuring the parts most measures do not reach: a necessity for evaluation in mental health promotion. Journal of Mental Health Promotion 1(2), 4–.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kammann, R., & Flett, R. (1983). A scale to measure current level of general happiness. Australian Psychologist 35, 259–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kammann, R., & Flett, R. (1983). Sourcebook for measuring well-being with Affectometer 2., Dunedin, New Zealand: Why Not? Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lo, J., & Zemke, R. (1997). The relationship between affective experiences during daily occupations and subjective well-being measures: a pilot study. Occupational Therapy of Mental Health 13(3), 1–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raeburn, J. M., Atkinson, J. M., Dubignon, J. M., Fitzpatrick, J., McPherson, M., & Elkind, G. S. (1994). Superhealth basic: development and evaluation of a low-cost community-based lifestyle change programme. Psychology and Health 9(5), 383–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Malam, S., Angle, H., Wimbush, H., & Fraser, E. (2004). Health Education Population Survey 1996–003. Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singleton, N., Bumpstead, R., O’Brien, M., Lee, A., & Meltzer, H. (2001). Psychiatric morbidity among adults living in private households. London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singleton, H. L. G. (2003). ed Better or worse: A longitudinal study of the mental health of adults living in private households in Great Britain. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1, 140–61.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cooper, C. (1998). Individual differences. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin 99, 432–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach’s Alpha. BMJ, 314, 572.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tennant, R., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2006). Monitoring positive mental health in Scotland; validation of the Affectometer 2 scale and development of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale. Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Regier, D. A., Farmer, M. E., Rae, D. S., Myers, J. K., Kramer, M., Robins, L. N., George, L. K., Karno, M., & Locke, B. Z. (1993). One-month prevalence of mental disorders in the United States and sociodemographic characteristics: the Epidemiologic Catchment area study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 88(1), 35–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smith, C. J., Mercy, J. A., & Conn, J. M. (1988). Marital status and the risk of suicide. American Journal of Public Health 78, 78–0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth Tennant
    • 1
  • Stephen Joseph
    • 2
  • Sarah Stewart-Brown
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Public Health and EpidemiologyUniversity of BirminghamEdgbaston, BirminghamUK
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and Social PolicyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  3. 3.Warwick Medical SchoolUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations