Quality of Life Research

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 17–29 | Cite as

The impact of mental illness on quality of life: A comparison of severe mental illness, common mental disorder and healthy population samples

  • Sherrill EvansEmail author
  • Sube Banerjee
  • Morven Leese
  • Peter Huxley


Patient-centred outcomes such as quality of life (QOL) are valued and used extensively in mental healthcare evaluations, but concerns remain about their practical application due to perceived measurement issues, including responsiveness and relationships with objective indicators and depression. Evidence from general population studies challenge some assumptions, suggesting that measurement difficulties might relate to the characteristics of mental health samples, rather than measurement itself. This paper assesses the impact of mental illness on QOL and its measurement, examining whether the life-conditions, opportunities and QOL of different mental health-status groups vary, and if explanatory models of domain-specific and global QOL differ. Objective life-conditions, access to life-opportunities and subjective QOL were assessed over 2 years, using the same methodology in severe mental illness (SMI; n = 149 (baseline)/n = 126 (follow-up)), common mental disorder (CMD; n = 794/354) and no disorder (n = 1119/583) groups. Objective life-conditions were worse in the SMI group than in mentally healthy population and CMD groups, but the opportunities available to the SMI group were no more restricted than the CMD group. Subjective QOL ratings reflected this; SMI group scores were lower than the healthy population and in some life-domains the CMD group. Models of QOL suggested that life-quality was explained differently in the three groups. QOL studies combining mental health samples should control for health-status group, and domain-specific and global indicators of lifestyle and opportunity.


Common mental disorder General population Measurement Severe mental illness Quality of life 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    NHS Executive/Social Services Inspectorate. All About Quality of Life. London: NHS Exec/SSI, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Department of Health. National Service Framework for Mental Health: Modern Standards and Service Models for Mental Health. London: DH, 1999.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Institute for Mental Health in England. About the National Institute for Mental Health in England (NIMHE) [online]. Available: (accessed November, 2001).
  4. 4.
    van Nieuwenhuizen C, Schene AH, Koeter MWJ, Huxley PJ (2001) The Lancashire quality of life profile: Modification and psychometric evaluation. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 36: 36–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Angermeyer MC, Holzinger A, Kilian R, Matschinger H (2001) Quality of life as defined by schizophrenic patients and psychiatrists. Int J Soc Psych 47: 34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taylor RE, Leese M, Clarkson P et al. (1998) Quality of life outcomes for intensive versus standard community mental health services. Br J Psychiatry 173:416–422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schneider J, Wooff D, Carpenter J et al. (2002) Community mental healthcare in England: Associations between service organisation and quality of life. Health Soc Care Commun 10:423–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ruggeri M, Nose M, Bonetto C et al. (2005) Changes and predictors of change in objective and subjective quality of life; multi-wave follow-up study in community psychiatric practice. Br J Psych 187:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barry MM, Crosby C (1996) Quality of life as an evaluative measure in assessing the impact of community care on people with long-term psychiatric disorders. Br J Psych 168:210–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mirin SM, Namerow SM (1991) Why study treatment outcome? Hosp Community Psychiatry 42:1007–1013PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moore M, Hofer S, McGee H, Ring L. Can the concepts of depression and quality of life be integrated using a time perspective. Health and QOL Outcomes 2005; 3 1 [Online] Available: http://www.hglo/content/3/1/1 (accessed 2nd May, 2006).
  12. 12.
    Andrews F, Withey SB (1976) Social Indicators of Well-being: Americans Perceptions of Quality of Life. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Michalos AC, Zumbo BD, Hubley A (2000) Health and the quality of life. Soc Indic Res 51:245–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Headey B, Glowacki T, Holmstrom E, Wearing A (1985) Modelling change in perceived QOL. Soc Indic Res 17:267–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Atkinson T (1982) Stability and validity of quality of life measures. Soc Indic Res 10:113–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lehman AF, Ward NC, Linn LS (1982) Chronic mental patients: the quality of life issue. Am J Psychiatry 139:1271–1276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lehman AF (1983) The well-being of chronic mental patients: assessing their quality of life. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:369–373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pukrop R, Moller HJ, Steinmeyer EM (2000) Quality of life in psychiatry: A systematic contribution to construct validation and the development of the integrative assessment tool ‚modular system for quality of life’. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 250:120–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goldney RD, Fisher LJ, Wilson DH, Cheok F (2000) Major depression and its associated morbidity and quality of life in a random, representative Australian community sample. Aust NZ J Psychiat 34:1022–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huxley P (2002) Mental Illness. In: Davies M (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Social Work (2nd edn). Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Campbell A, Converse PE, Rogers WL (1976) The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, Satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Evans S, Huxley P. Quality of life measurement in mental health: Some recent findings. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Studies. Univerity of Girona, 2000: 271–281.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thomas R, Evans S, Gately C et al. (2002) State event relations among indicators of susceptibility to mental distress in Wythenshawe. Soc Sci Med 55:921–935CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Huxley P, Evans S, Leese M et al. (2004) Urban regeneration and mental health. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 38(4):280–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Burns T, Creed F, Fahy T et al (1999) Intensive versus standard case management for severe psychotic illness: A randomised trial. Lancet 353:2185–2189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Department of Environment, Transport & Regions. Indices of deprivation 2000 (Regeneration Research Summary No31) [online]. Available:http://www.urban/ (accessed 26th April, 2003).
  27. 27.
    Office of National Statistics. Why census shows fewer men (online). Available from: (accessed March, 2003).
  28. 28.
    MORI. Single Regeneration Budget Challenge Fund Evaluation (1996–2001). London: Market Opinion Research International, 2001.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brugha T, Evans S (2003) Better or Worse: A Longitudinal Study of the Mental Health of Adults Living in Private Households in Great Britain. TSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Goldberg D, Huxley P (1992) Common Mental Disorders: A Bio-Social Model. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Goldberg D (1992) General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). NFER-Nelson, WindsorGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Goldberg D, Williams P (1988) A Users Guide to the General Health Questionnaire. NFER-Nelson, WindsorGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kitamura T, Shima S, Toda M, Sugawara M (1993) Comparison of different scoring systems for the Japanese version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychopathology 26:108–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Goldberg DP, Gater RA, Sartorius N et al. (1997) The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health-care. Psychol Med 27:191–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Spitzer RL, Endicott J, Robins L (1978) Research Diagnostic Criteria: rationale and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 35:773–782PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Oliver JPJ (1991) The social care directive: development of a quality of life profile for use in community services for the mentally ill. Soc Wk Soc Sci Rev 3:5–45Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bradburn N (1969) The Structure of Psychological Well-being. Aldine Publishing Co., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rosenberg M (1965) Society and Adolescent Self-image. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Simes RJ (1986) An improved Bonferroni procedure with multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 73:751–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tabachnick BG, Fiddell LS (2001) Using Multivariate Statistics (4th edn). Allyn & Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences (2nd edn.). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Evans S, Huxley P (2005) Adaptation, response shift and quality of life ratings in mentally well and unwell groups. Qual Life Res 14(7):1719–1732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Department for Work & Pensions. Statistical summary — March 2002 [online]. Available:http://www.dwp.asd.asd1/stats_summary/Stats_summary_March2002_AllDWP.pdf (accessed April, 2003).
  44. 44.
    Department for Work & Pensions. Statistical summary — June 2002 [online]. Available:http://www.dwp.asd.asd1/stats_summary/Stats_summary_June2002_AllDWP.pdf (accessed April, 2003).
  45. 45.
    Department for Work & Pensions. Statistical summary — September 2002 [online]. Available:http://www.dwp.asd. asd1/stats_summary/Stats_summary_Sept2002.pdf (Accessed April, 2003).
  46. 46.
    Department for Work & Pensions. Statistical summary — December 2002 [online]. Available:http://www.dwp.asd.asd1/stats_summary/Stats_summary_December2002_All DWP.pdf (accessed April, 2003).
  47. 47.
    Department for Work & Pensions. DWP statistical summary — March 2003 [online]. Available:http://www.dwp.asd.asd1/stats_summary/Stats_summary_March2003.pdf (accessed April, 2003).
  48. 48.
    Sprangers MAG, Schwartz CE (1999) Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Soc Sci Med 48:1507–1515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sutcliffe C, Cordingley L, Burns A (2000) A new version of the geriatric depression scale for nursing and residential home populations: The geriatric depression scale (residential) (GDS-12R). Int Psychogeriat 12:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    McKenzie N, Marks I (1999) Quick rating of depressed mood in-patients with anxiety disorders. Br J Psychiatry 174:266–269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pomeroy IM, Clark CR, Philp I (2001) The effectiveness of very short scales for depression screening in elderly medical patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 16:321–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schyns P (2001) Income and satisfaction in Russia. J Happiness Stud 2:173–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sherrill Evans
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
    Email author
  • Sube Banerjee
    • 1
  • Morven Leese
    • 1
  • Peter Huxley
    • 3
  1. 1.King’s CollegeInstitute of PsychiatryLondonUK
  2. 2.Social Work and Social Care Section, Health Services Research Department, David Goldberg CentreInstitute of PsychiatryLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Applied Social SciencesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
  4. 4.Social Work and Social Care Section (Box 032), Health Services Research DepartmentDavid Goldberg Centre, Institute of PsychiatryLondonUK

Personalised recommendations