Abstract
Background: Fatigue is the most common unrelieved symptom experienced by people with cancer. The purpose of this study was to examine whether cancer-related fatigue (CRF) can be summarized using a single score, that is, whether CRF is sufficiently unidimensional for measurement approaches that require or assume unidimensionality. We evaluated this question using factor analysis techniques including the theory-driven bi-factor model. Methods: Five hundred and fifty five cancer patients from the Chicago metropolitan area completed a 72-item fatigue item bank, covering a range of fatigue-related concerns including intensity, frequency and interference with physical, mental, and social activities. Dimensionality was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) techniques. Results: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) techniques identified from 1 to 17 factors. The bi-factor model suggested that CRF was sufficiently unidimensional. Conclusions: CRF can be considered sufficiently unidimensional for applications that require unidimensionality. One such application, item response theory (IRT), will facilitate the development of short-form and computer-adaptive testing. This may further enable practical and accurate clinical assessment of CRF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
World Health Organization. Cancer Pain Relief and Palliative Care. Report of a WHO Expert Committee World Health Organization Technical Report Series 1990: 804, 1-75
Cella D, Davis K, Breitbart W and Curt G (2001). Cancer-related fatigue: Prevalence of proposed diagnostic criteria in a United States sample of cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 19: 3385–3391
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Practice Guildlines in Oncology: Cancer-Related Fatigue. http://www.nccn.org. 2004
Stone P, Richardson A, Ream E, Smith AG, Kerr DJ and Kearney N (2000). Cancer-related fatigue: Inevitable, unimportant and untreatable? Results of a multi-centre patient survey. Cancer fatigue forum. Ann Oncol 11: 971–975
Cella DF, Dineen K and Arnason B (1996). Validation of the functional assessment of multiple sclerosis quality of life instrument. Neurology 47: 129–139
Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Bjordal K, Kaasa S. (1998). Health-related quality of life in the general Norwegian population assessed by the European organization for research and treatment of cancer core quality-of-life questionnaire: The QLQ = C30 (+3). J Clin Oncol 16: 1188–1196.
Mendoza TR, Wang XS and Cleeland CS (1999). The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: Use of the brief fatigue inventory. Cancer 85: 1186–1196
Piper BF, Dibble SL, Dodd MJ, Weiss MC, Slaughter RE and Paul SM (1998). The revised piper fatigue scale: Psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nursing Forum 25: 677–684
Smets EMA, Garssen B and Bonke B (1995). The multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychometr Res 39: 315–325
Hann DM, Jacobsen PB and Azzarello LM (1998). Measurement of fatigue in cancer patients: Development and validation of the fatigue symptom inventory. Qual Life Res 7: 301–310
Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H and Rogers HJ (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. SAGE Publications Inc, Newbury Park, CA
Kaiser HF (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Measure 20: 141–151
Cattell RB (1966). The screen test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1: 245–276
Hatcher L (1994). A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structure Equation Modeling. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC
Tucker LR and Lewis C (1973). The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38: 1–10
Velicer WF (1976). Determining the number of components from matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika 41: 321–327
Horn JL (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 30: 179–185
McDonald RP (1999). Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. Lawrence Earlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
World Health Organization. (1946). Constitution of the World Health Organization. WHO, Geneva
Lai J-S, Cella D, Dineen K, Von Roenn J and Gershon R (2005). An item bank was created to improve the measurement of cancer-related fatigue. J Clin Epidemiol 58: 190–197
Zumbo BD (1999). A Handbook on the Theory and Methods of Differential Item Functioning (DIF): Logistic Regression Modeling As a Unitary Framework for Binary and Likert-Type (Ordinal) Item Scores. Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense, Ottawa, ON
Cella D, Lai J-S, Chang CH, Peterman A and Slavin M (2002). Fatigue in cancer patients compared with fatigue in the general United States population. Cancer 94: 528–538
Lai J-S, Cella D, Chang C-H, Bode R and Heinemann AW (2003). Item banking to improve, shorten and computerize self-reported fatigue: An illustration of steps to create a Core Item Bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale. Qual Life Res 12: 485–501
Hayton JC, Allen DG and Scarpello V (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organ Res Methods 7: 191–205
Zwick WR and Velicer WF (1986). Factors influencing five rules for determining the nunber of components to retain. Psychol Bull 99: 432–442
SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT, Version 8.2; Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc., 2002
Hu L-T and Bentler PM (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria vs. new alternatives. Struct Equation Model 6: 1–55
Schumacker RE and Lomax RG (1996). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Lawrence Earlboum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ
Marsh HW, Balla JR and McDonald RP (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychol Bull 103: 391–470
Zwick WR and Velicer WF (1986). A comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychol Bull 99: 432–442
Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC and Strahan EJ (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Meth 4: 272–299
O’Connor BP (2000). SPSS and SAS Programs for determining the number of components using Parallel Analysis and Velicer’s MAP Test. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comp 32: 396–402
Glorfeld LW (1995). An improvement on horn’s parallel analysis methodology for selecting the correct number of factors on retain. Educ Psychol Measure 55: 377–393
Hays RD (1987). PARALLEL: A program for performing parallel analysis. Appl Psychol Measure 11: 58
Gibbons R and Hedeker D (1992). Full-information item bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika 57: 423–436
Muthen LK and Muthen BO (2004). MPlus: Statistical Analysis With Latent Variables. Muthen & Muthen, Los Angeles, CA
Yellen SB, Cella DF, Webster K, Blendowski C and Kaplan E (1997). Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) measurement system. J Pain Symptom Manage 13: 63–74
Smets EM, Garssen B and Schuster-Uitterhoeve AL (1993). Fatigue in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 68: 220–224
Davis K and Cella D (2003). Assessing quality of life in oncology clinical practice: A review of barriers and critical success factors. J Clin Outcome Manage 9: 327–332
Frael JG, Kraft GH and Coryell JK (1984). Symptomatic fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 5: 135–137
Denburg SD, Carbotte RM and Denburg JA (1997). Psychological aspects of systemic lupus erythematosus: Cognitive funciton, mood and self-report. J Rheumatol 24: 998–1003
Jones EA (1995). Fatigue associated with chronic liver disease: A riddle wrappe din a mystery inside an enigma. Hepatology 22: 1606–1608
Breitbart W, McDonald MV, Rosenfeld B, Monkman ND and Passik S (1998). Fatigue in ambulatory AIDS patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 15: 159–167
Chang WK, Hung KY, Huang JW, Wu KD and Tsai TJ (2001). Chronic fatigue in long-term peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Nephrol 21: 479–485
Srivastava RH (1989). Fatigue in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients. Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY
Huyser BA, Parker JC, Thoreson R, Smarr KL, Johnson JC and Hoffman R (1998). Predictors of subjective fatigue among individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 41: 2230–2237
Wolfe F, Hawley DJ and Wilson K (1996). The Prevalence and meaning of fatigue in rheumatic disease. J Rheumatol 23: 1407–1417
Embretson SE and Reise SP (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
Stout W (1990). A new item response theory modeling approach with application to unidimensional assessment and ability estimation. Psychometrika 55: 293–326
Mitchell CM and Beals J (1997). The structure of problem and positive behavior among American Indian adolescents: Gender and community differences. Am J Commun Psychol 25: 257–288
Velicer WF, Eaton CA and Fava JL (2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In: Goffin, RD and Helmes, E (eds) Problems and Solutions in Human Assessments: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at Seventy, pp 41–71. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9166-0
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lai, JS., Crane, P.K. & Cella, D. Factor analysis techniques for assessing sufficient unidimensionality of cancer related fatigue. Qual Life Res 15, 1179–1190 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-0060-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-0060-6