The Impact of 29 Chronic Conditions on Health-related Quality of Life: A General Population Survey in Finland Using 15D and EQ-5D
- 1.3k Downloads
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an essential outcome of health care, but there is no gold standard of HRQoL measurement. We investigated the impact of major chronic conditions on HRQoL using 15D and EQ-5D in a representative sample of Finns.
Information on chronic somatic conditions was obtained by interviews. Psychiatric disorders were diagnosed using a structured interview (M-CIDI). Tobit and CLAD regression analysis was used to estimate the impact of conditions on HRQoL at the individual and population level.
Adjusted for other conditions and sociodemographic variables, Parkinson’s disease had the largest negative impact on HRQoL at the individual level, followed by anxiety disorders, depressive disorders and arthrosis of the hip and knee. Based on prevalence, arthrosis of the hip or knee, depression, back problems and urinary incontinence caused the greatest loss of HRQoL at the population level. The results obtained with the two HRQoL measures differed markedly for some conditions and the EQ-5D results also varied with the regression method used.
Musculoskeletal disorders are associated with largest losses of HRQoL in the Finnish population, followed by psychiatric conditions. Different HRQoL measures may systematically emphasize different conditions.
KeywordsChronic conditions Health surveys Health utility Quality of life Quality-adjusted life years
Censored least absolute deviations
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition
Health-related quality of life
Health Utilities Index
Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview
Quality-adjusted life year
Years lived with disability
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
SIS received grants from the Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation, the Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation and the Finnish Medical Foundation.
- 4.Aromaa A, Koskinen S (eds). (2004) Health and Functional Capacity in Finland. Baseline Results of the Health 2000 Health Examination Survey, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
- 5.OECD (1982) The OECD List of Social Indicators. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
- 8.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn. Washington: American Psychiatric Association, 1994Google Scholar
- 9.EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 1990; 16: 199–208Google Scholar
- 12.Kind P, Hardman G, Macran S. UK Population Norms for EQ-5D. In: Discussion Paper 172. University of York: The Centre for Health Economics, 1999Google Scholar
- 16.Sintonen H (1994) The 15D Measure of Health Related Quality of Life: Reliability, Validity and Sensitivity of its Health State Descriptive System. Working Paper 41. Centre for Health Program Evaluation Monash University, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- 17.Sintonen H. (1995) The 15D Measure of Health Related Quality of Life. II Feasibility, Reliability and Validity of its Valuation System. Working Paper 42. Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Monash University, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- 23.Cong R. Marginal effects for the tobit model. Stata Tech Bull 2000; 56: 27–34Google Scholar
- 26.Dolan P (2000) The measurement of health-related quality of life for use in resource allocation decisions in health care. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP (eds), Handbook of Health Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1723–1760Google Scholar
- 28.Wooldridge JM. Corner solution outcomes and censored regression models. In: Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2002: 517–549Google Scholar
- 31.Powell J (1984) Least absolute deviations estimation for the censored regression model. J Econ 25: 303–325Google Scholar
- 32.Ohinmaa A, Sintonen H. Inconsistencies and modelling of the Finnish EuroQol (EQ-5D) preference values. In: Greiner W, Graf V, Schulenburg J-M, et al. (eds), Plenary Meeting Hannover 1998, 1st-2nd October, Discussion Papers. Hannover: Uni-Verlag Witte; 1999: 57–74Google Scholar
- 33.STATA (2003) Users Guide Release 8. Stata Press, College Station, TXGoogle Scholar
- 34.Migon HS, Gamerman D. Statistical Inference: An Integrated Approach: Arnold, 1999Google Scholar
- 37.Sintonen H, Weijnen T, Nieuwenhuizen M, et al. (2003) Comparison of EQ-5D valuations: Analysis of background variables. In: Brooks R, Rabin R, de Charro F (eds), The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status using EQ-5D: A European Perspective. Evidence from the EuroQoL BIOMED Research Programme. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 81–101Google Scholar
- 47.Murray CJ, Lopez AD (eds) (1996) The Global Burden of Disease: A Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability From Diseases, Injuries and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020. Harvard University Press, Boston, MassGoogle Scholar
- 48.WHO. The World Health Report 2001: Mental Health: New Understanding. New Hope: World Health Organization, 2001Google Scholar