The prevalence of person-perceived participation restriction in community-dwelling older adults
To estimate the prevalence, nature and distribution of person-perceived participation restriction, in community-dwelling older adults.
Population based cross-sectional postal survey of 11,055 adults aged 50 years and over in North Staffordshire, United Kingdom. Person-perceived participation restriction was measured using the Keele Assessment of Participation which covers 11 different aspects of life mapped to the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Functioning. Four-week period prevalence was calculated for restriction in any, multiple and for each aspect separately. Prevalence estimates were calculated for the total sample, and for each age and gender stratum.
A total of 7,878 subjects responded (adjusted response – 71.3%). The 4-week period prevalence of any participation restriction was 51.8%; 3.3% had substantial restriction. Participation restriction increased with age (p<0.001) and, for moderate and substantial restriction, was more frequent in women. The prevalence of restricted participation in individual aspects of life ranged from 3.8% (work) to 25.9% (mobility outside the home).
Some restriction of participation ‚as and when we want it’ is common in the general population and increases with age, although severe restriction only affects a minority. The distribution of person-perceived participation restriction is similar to that of impairments and activity limitation in community-dwelling older adults.
Key wordsGeneral population Elderly Participation restriction Person-perceived ICF
- 1.Robine JM, Jagger C, Mathers CD, Crimmins EM, Suzman RM, Peron Y. Introduction. In: Robine JM,␣Jagger C, Mathers CD, Crimmins EM, Suzman RM (eds), Determining Health Expectancies. Chichester: John Wiley and sons, 2003Google Scholar
- 2.World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 6.Martin J, Meltzer H, Elliot D. (1987). OPCS Surveys of Disability in Great Britain: The Prevalence of Disability Among Adults. OPCS, HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 10.Bebbington AC, Darton RA. (1996). Healthy life expectancy in England and Wales: Recent evidence. PSSRU, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 11.Cousins C, Jenkins J, Laux R. Disability data from the Labour Force Survey: Comparing 1997–1998 with the past. In: Office for National Statistics. Labour Market Trends (June edition). HMSO: London, 1998Google Scholar
- 13.Harwood RH, Prince MJ, Mann AH, Ebrahim S. (1998). The prevalence of diagnoses, impairments, disabilities and handicaps in a population of elderly people living in a defined geographical area: the Gospel Oak project. Age Ageing 2:707–714Google Scholar
- 18.Thomas E, Wilkie R, Peat G, Hill S, Dziedzic KS, Croft PR. (2004). The epidemiology and management of clinical osteoarthritis in the older population: Prospective 3-year study of natural history and health care utilisation in the general population. BMC Musculoskel Disorders 5(1):2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Trinder P. South Stoke Primary Care Trust. Demography and Deprivation Profile. Directorate of Health Policy and Public Health, North Staffordshire Health, 2002 http://www.nsha.co.uk/home/library/hp/hpGoogle Scholar
- 20.Trinder P. Newcastle-under-Lyme Primary Care Trust. Demography and Deprivation Profile. Directorate of Health Policy and Public Health, North Staffordshire Health, 2002 http://www.nsha.co.uk/home/library/hp/hpGoogle Scholar
- 22.Wilkie R, Peat GM, Thomas E, Hooper H, Croft PR. (2005). The Keele assessment of participation: A new instrument to measure participation restriction in population studies. Combined qualitative and quantitative examination of its psychometric properties. Qual Life Res 14(8):1889–1899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Bland M. (1995). An Introduction to Medical Statistics 2nd edn. Oxford Medical Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 24.Office for National Statistics. (2002). Health Quarterly 20. Office for National Statistics, LondonGoogle Scholar