Quality of Life Research

, Volume 14, Issue 10, pp 2177–2185

Estimating Utility Values for Health States of Overweight and Obese Individuals Using the SF-36

Article

Abstract

Objective: To use health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) data from the Australian 1995 National Health Survey to estimate the impact of obesity (as measured by body mass index or BMI) on utility and quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE).Method: SF-36 responses from 12,661 individuals in the general population were transformed into utility values using the SF-6D algorithm developed by Brazier and colleagues. Separate regression analyses for males and females were used to examine the impact of BMI and five obesity-related medical conditions (diabetes, coronary heart disease, depression, musculoskeletal disorders, and cancer) on utility. The utility estimates were used to provide indicative estimates of the decrease in QALE associated with being overweight or obese.Results: There was a statistically significant negative relationship between BMI and utility for males and females. For males (females), the marginal effect of a one-unit increase in BMI was associated with a −0.0024 (−0.0034) decrement in utility. Based on these estimates, a non-smoking male (female) aged 40 years who is obese can expect 7.2 (8.7) years less of QALE over their remaining lifetime.Conclusions : Results suggest that BMI is negatively associated with utility. Evaluation of policies designed to prevent or treat obesity should capture HRQoL as an outcome.

Keywords

Health-related quality-of-life Health status Obesity Quality-adjusted life year SF-36 SF-6D 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    O’Brien, PE, Dixon, JE 2002The extent of the problem of obesityAm J Surg1844S8SPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Booth, ML, Chey, T, Wake, M,  et al. 2003Change in the prevalence of overweight and obesity among young Australians, 1969–1997Am J Clin Nutr772936PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DHHS2001The Surgeon General’s call to action to prevent and decrease overweight and obesityU.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Public Health Service Office of the Surgeon GeneralWashington DCGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seidell, JC, Flegal, KM 1997Assessing obesity: Classification and epidemiologyBr Med Bull53238252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bray, GA 1992Pathophysiology of obesityAm J Clin Nutr55488S494SPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Colditz, GA 1992Economic costs of obesityAm J Clin Nutr55503S507SSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pi-Sunyer, FX 1996A review of long-term studies evaluating the efficacy of weight loss in ameliorating disorders associated with obesityClin Ther1810061035CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peeters, A, Barendregt, JJ, Willekens, F,  et al. 2003Obesity in adulthood and its consequences for life expectancy: A life table analysisAnn Intern Med1382432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Doll, HA, Petersen, SEK, Stewart-Brown, SL 2000Obesity and physical and emotional well being: Associations between body mass index, chronic illness, and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 questionnaireObes Res8160170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fontaine, KR, Bartlett, SJ, Barofsky, I 2000Health-related quality of life among obese persons seeking and not currently seeking treatmentInt J Eat Disord17101105Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Katz, DA, McHorney, CA, Atkinson, RL 2000Impact of obesity on health-related quality of life in patients with chronic illnessJ Gen Intern Med15789796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fanuele, JC, Abdu, WA, Hanscom, B,  et al. 2002Association between obesity and functional status in patients with spine diseaseSpine27306312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Larsson, U, Karlsson, J, Sullivan, M 2002Impact of overweight and obesity on health-related quality of life – a Swedish population studyInt J Obes Relat Metab Disord26417424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marchesini, G, Solaroli, E, Baraldi, L,  et al. 2000Health-related quality of life in obesity: The role of eating behaviourDiab Nutr Metab13156164Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown, WJ, Mishra, G, Kenardy, J,  et al. 2000Relationship between body mass index and well-being in young Australian womenInt J Obes Relat Metab Disord2413601368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Finkelstein, M 2000Body mass index and quality of life in a survey of primary care patientsJ Fam Pract49734737PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ware, JE, Snow, KK, Kolinski, M,  et al. 1993SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and Interpretation GuideBoston, MassachusettsThe Health Institute, New England Medical CenterGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brazier, J, Roberts, J, Deverill, M 2002The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36J Health Econ21271292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hollingworth, W, Deyo, RA, Sullivan, SD,  et al. 2002The practicality and validity of directly elicited SF-36 derived health state preferences in patients with low back painHealth Econ117185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lundberg, L, Johannesson, M, Isacson, DGA,  et al. 1999The relationship between health-state utilities and the SF-12 in a general populationMed Decis Making19128140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Franks, P, Lubetkin, EL, Gold, MR,  et al. 2003Mapping SF-12 to preference based instruments: Convergent validity in a low-income, minority populationMed Care4112771283PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fryback, DG, Dasbach, EJ, Klien, R,  et al. 1993The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study: initial catalogue of health-state quality factorsMed Decis Making1389102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nichol, MB, Sengupta, N, Globe, DR 2001Evaluating quality adjusted life years: Estimation of the Health Utility Index (HUI) from the SF-36Med Decis Making21105112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sengupta, N, Nichol, MB, Wu, J,  et al. 2004Mapping the SF-12 to the HUI and VAS in managed care populationMed Care42927937PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    ABS1997National Health Survey. Technical Paper for Sample FileAustralian Bureau of StatisticsCanberraGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ABS. National Health Survey: Users’ Guide, Australia 1995. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 1996. Report No.: 4399.0.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stevens, J, Cai, J, Pamuk, ER,  et al. 1998The effect of age on the association between body-mass and mortalityN Engl J Med38817Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Diehr, P, Bild, DE, Harris, TB,  et al. 1998Body mass index and mortality in non-smoking older adults: The cardiovascular health studyAm J Public Health99623629Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Inoue, M, Sobue, T, Tsugane, S 2004Impact of body mass index on the risk of total cancer incidence and mortality among middle-aged Japanese: Data from a large-scale population-based cohort study – the JPHC studyCancer Causes Control15671680PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Spencer, EA, Appleby, PN, Davey, GK,  et al. 2002Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC - Oxford participantsPublic Health Nutr5561565PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Walters, SJ, Brazier, JE 2003What is the relationship between the minimally important difference in health state utility values? The case of the SF-6DHealth Qual Life Outcomes118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jenkinson, C, Stewart-Brown, S, Petersen, S,  et al. 1999Assessment of the SF-36 Version 2 in the United KingdomJ Epidemiol Community Health534650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ohsawa, I, Ishida, T, Oshida, Y, Yamanouchi, K, Sato, Y 2003Subjective health values of individuals with diabetes in Japan: Comparison of utility values with the SF-36 scoresDiabetes Res Clin Pract.62916OctCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hakim, Z, Wolf, A, Garrison, LP 2002Estimating the effect of changes in body mass index on health state preferencesPharmacoeconomics20393404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chaing, CL 1984The Life table and its ApplicationsRobert E Krieger Publishing CompanyMalabar, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    ABS. How Australians Measure Up. Canberra: ABS; 1998. Report No.: 4359.0.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chou SY, Grossman M, Saffer H. An economic analysis of adult obesity: Results from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2002. Report No.: 9247.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cawley J, Danziger S. Obesity as a Barrier to the Transition from Welfare to Work: Cornell University; 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  2. 2.Health Economics Research Centre, Department of Public HealthUniversity of Oxford and the Australian Centre for Diabetes StrategiesRandwickAustralia
  3. 3.Health Research and Development SectionYounger Veterans Branch, Department of Veterans’ AffairsWodenAustralia

Personalised recommendations