Quality of Life Research

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 1005–1021 | Cite as

The CarerQol instrument: A new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations

  • W. B. F. Brouwer
  • N. J. A. van Exel
  • B. van Gorp
  • W. K. Redekop
Article

Abstract

The societal perspective in economic evaluations dictates that costs and effects of informal care are included in the analyses. However, this incorporation depends on practically applicable, reliable and valid methods to register the impact of informal care. This paper presents the conceptualisation and a first test of the CarerQol instrument, aimed at measuring care-related quality of life in informal caregivers. The instrument combines the information density of a burden instrument (encompassing seven important burden dimensions) with a valuation component (a VAS scale for happiness). The instrument was tested in a Dutch sample of heterogeneous caregivers (n = 175) approached through regional caregiver support centres. This first test describes the feasibility as well as convergent and clinical validity of the CarerQol instrument. The seven burden dimensions related well with differences in VAS scores. In all instances, the average CarerQol-VAS scores decreased as the severity of problems increased. Multivariate analyses showed that the seven burden dimensions explained 37–43% of the variation in CarerQol-VAS scores, depending on the model used. The CarerQol seems a promising new instrument to register the impact of informal caregivers in economic evaluations.

Keywords

CarerQol instrument Informal care Methodology Valuation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hirst, M 2005Carer distress: A prospective, population-based studySoc Sci Med61697708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Exel, NJA, Bos, GAM, Berg, B, Koopmanschap, MA, Brouwer, WBF 2004bWhat really matters: an inquiry into the relative importance of dimensions of care giving burdenClin Rehabil18683693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brouwer, WBF, Exel, NJA, Berg, B, Dinant, HJ, Koopmanschap, MA, Bos, GAM 2004The burden of care giving: Evidence on objective burden, subjective burden and quality of life impacts in informal caregivers for patients with Rheumatoid ArthritisArthritis Care Res51570577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Given, CW, Given, B, Stommel, M, Collins, C, King, S, Franklin, S 1992The caregiver reaction assessment (CRA) for caregivers to persons with chronic physical and mental impairmentRes Nursing Health15271283Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Montgomery, RJV, Goneya, JG, Hooyman, NR 1985Care giving and the experience of subjective and objective burdenFamily Relations341926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Exel, NJA, Koopmanschap, MA, Berg, B, Brouwer, WBF, Bos, GAM 2005Burden of informal care giving for stroke patients: identification of caregivers at risk of adverse health effectsCerebrovasc Dis191117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schulz, R, Beach, SR 1999Care giving as a risk factor for mortality: The caregiver health effects studyJAMA28222152219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gold, MRSiegel, JERussell, LBWeinstein, MC eds. 1996Cost-Effectiveness in Health and MedicineOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brouwer, WBF, Rutten, FFH, Koopmanschap, MA 2001

    Costing in economic evaluations

    Drummond, MFMcGuire, A eds. Economic Evaluation in Health Care: Merging Theory with PracticeOxford University PressNew York
    Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brouwer, WBF, Exel, NJA, Koopmanschap, MA, Rutten, FFH 1999The valuation of informal care in Economic Appraisal; a consideration of individual choice and societal costs of timeInt J Technol Assess in Health Care15147160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berg, B, Brouwer, WBF, Koopmanschap, MA 2004Economic evaluation of informal care: An overview of methods and applicationsEur J Health Econ53645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sales, E 2003Family burden and quality of lifeQual Life Res123341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yamazaki, S, Sokejima, S, Mizoue, T, Eboshida, A, Fikuhara, S 2005Health related quality of life of mothers of children with leukaemia in JapanQual Life Res1410791085PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hankey, GJ 2004Informal care giving for disabled stroke survivorsBMJ32810851086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berg, B, Brouwer, WBF, Exel, NJA, Koopmanschap, MA 2005aValuation of informal care: The contingent valuation method applied in informal caregivingHealth Econ14169183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berg, B, Al, MJ, Brouwer, WBF, Exel, NJA, Koopmanschap, MA 2005bEconomic valuation of informal care: The conjoint measurement method applied in informal caregivingSoc Sci Med6113421355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koopmanschap, MA, Exel, NJA, Bos, GAM, Berg, B, Brouwer, WBF 2004The desire for support and respite care; preferences of Dutch informal caregiversHealth Policy68309320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robinson, BC 1983Validation of a Caregiver Strain IndexJ Gerontol38344348PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vernooij-Dassen, MJFJ, Persoon, JMG, Felling, AJA 1996Predictors of sense of competence in caregivers of demented personsSoc Sci Med434149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Exel, NJA, Scholteop Reimer, WJM, Brouwer, WBF, Berg, B, Koopmanschap, MA, Bos, GAM 2004aInstruments for assessing the burden of informal care giving for stroke patients in clinical practice: a comparison of CSI, CRA, SCQ and self-rated burdenClin Rehabil18203214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McIntosh, E, Donaldson, C, Ryan, M 1999Recent advances in the methods of cost-benefit analysis in healthcare. Matching the art to the sciencePharmacoeconomics15357367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brouwer, WBF, Koopmanschap, MA 2000On the Economic Foundations of CEA. Gentlemen (m/f), take your positions!J Health Econ19439459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    EuroQol Group1990EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of lifeHealth Policy16199208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dolan, P 1997Modeling valuations for EuroQol health statesMed Care3510951108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lawton, MP, Kleban, MH, Moss, M, Rovine, M, Glicksman, A 1989Measuring caregiving appraisalJ Gerontol446171Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Novak, M, Guest, C 1989Application of a multidimensional Caregiver Burden InventoryGerontologist29798803PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kinney, JM, Stephens, MAP 1989Caregiver Hassles Scale: assessing the daily hassles of caring for a family member with dementiaGerontologist29332Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kosberg, JI, Cairl, RE 1986The Cost of Care Index: a case management tool for screening informal care providersGerontologist26273278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zarit, SH, Reever, KE, Bach-Peterson, J 1980Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burdenGerontologist20649655PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Veenhoven, R 1984Conditions of HappinessKluwer academicDordrecht NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Musschenga, AW 1997The relation between concepts of quality-of-life, health and happinessJ Med Philos221128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brouwer, WBF, Exel, NJA, Berg, B, Bos, GAM, Koopmanschap, MA 2005Process utility from providing informal care: The benefit of caringHealth Policy748599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Easterlin RA. Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some experimental evidence, In: David PA, Reder MW (eds.), Nations and Households in Economic Growth – Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz, Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Easterlin, RA 1995Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?J Econ Behav Org273547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Frey, B, Stutzer, A 2002What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?J Econ Lit40402435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A, Praag, BM 2002The subjective costs of health losses due to chronic diseases. An alternative model for monetary appraisalHealth Econ11709722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Torrance, GW, Feeny, D, Furlong, W 2001Visual Analogue Scales: Do They Have a Role in the Measurement of Preferences for Health States?Med Dec Making21329334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Van den Berg B, Ferrer-i-Carbonell A. The well-being of informal caregivers: A monetary valuation of informal care. Working paper, University of Amsterdam, 2004.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mathers, CD, Murray, CJ, Ezzati, M, Gakidou, E, Salomon, JA, Stein, C 2003Population health metrics: crucial inputs to the development of evidence for health policyPopul Health Metr16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ferrer-i-Carbonell MA, Frijters P. How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Econ J, 2004; 114(july):641–659.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Van den Berg B, Pauwen P. Measurement of informal care: An empirical study into the reliable measurement of time spent on informal care giving. Health Economics, in press.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brugge, C, Alexander, H, Hagen, S 1999Stroke patients’ informal caregivers: Patient, caregiver, and service factors that affect caregiver strainStroke2015171523Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Van Exel NJA, Van den Berg B, Van den Bos GAM, Koopmanschap MA, Brouwer WBF. Informal care in the Netherlands: A situational sketch of informal care-providers reached by Informal Care Centres. iMTA report 02.58b. Rotterdam: Erasmus MC. 2002. Available from: http://www.bmg.eur.nl/imta/reports.
  44. 44.
    Van Exel NJA, Moree M, Koopmanschap MA, Schreuder-Goedheit T, Brouwer WBF. Respite care. n explorative study of demand and use in Dutch informal caregivers. Submitted paper.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Van den Berg B, Brouwer WBF, van Exel NJA, Koopmanschap MA, van den Bos GAM, Rutten FFH. The opportunity cost method and the proxy good method applied in informal caregivers. Soc Sci & Med, in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. B. F. Brouwer
    • 1
    • 2
  • N. J. A. van Exel
    • 1
    • 2
  • B. van Gorp
    • 1
  • W. K. Redekop
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Health Policy & ManagementErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.iBMG/iMTAErasmus MCRoterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations