The CarerQol instrument: A new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations
- 1.2k Downloads
The societal perspective in economic evaluations dictates that costs and effects of informal care are included in the analyses. However, this incorporation depends on practically applicable, reliable and valid methods to register the impact of informal care. This paper presents the conceptualisation and a first test of the CarerQol instrument, aimed at measuring care-related quality of life in informal caregivers. The instrument combines the information density of a burden instrument (encompassing seven important burden dimensions) with a valuation component (a VAS scale for happiness). The instrument was tested in a Dutch sample of heterogeneous caregivers (n = 175) approached through regional caregiver support centres. This first test describes the feasibility as well as convergent and clinical validity of the CarerQol instrument. The seven burden dimensions related well with differences in VAS scores. In all instances, the average CarerQol-VAS scores decreased as the severity of problems increased. Multivariate analyses showed that the seven burden dimensions explained 37–43% of the variation in CarerQol-VAS scores, depending on the model used. The CarerQol seems a promising new instrument to register the impact of informal caregivers in economic evaluations.
KeywordsCarerQol instrument Informal care Methodology Valuation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Given, CW, Given, B, Stommel, M, Collins, C, King, S, Franklin, S 1992The caregiver reaction assessment (CRA) for caregivers to persons with chronic physical and mental impairmentRes Nursing Health15271283Google Scholar
- 8.Gold, MRSiegel, JERussell, LBWeinstein, MC eds. 1996Cost-Effectiveness in Health and MedicineOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
- 9.Brouwer, WBF, Rutten, FFH, Koopmanschap, MA 2001Costing in economic evaluationsDrummond, MFMcGuire, A eds. Economic Evaluation in Health Care: Merging Theory with PracticeOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
- 25.Lawton, MP, Kleban, MH, Moss, M, Rovine, M, Glicksman, A 1989Measuring caregiving appraisalJ Gerontol446171Google Scholar
- 27.Kinney, JM, Stephens, MAP 1989Caregiver Hassles Scale: assessing the daily hassles of caring for a family member with dementiaGerontologist29332Google Scholar
- 30.Veenhoven, R 1984Conditions of HappinessKluwer academicDordrecht NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- 33.Easterlin RA. Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some experimental evidence, In: David PA, Reder MW (eds.), Nations and Households in Economic Growth – Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz, Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
- 38.Van den Berg B, Ferrer-i-Carbonell A. The well-being of informal caregivers: A monetary valuation of informal care. Working paper, University of Amsterdam, 2004.Google Scholar
- 40.Ferrer-i-Carbonell MA, Frijters P. How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Econ J, 2004; 114(july):641–659.Google Scholar
- 41.Van den Berg B, Pauwen P. Measurement of informal care: An empirical study into the reliable measurement of time spent on informal care giving. Health Economics, in press.Google Scholar
- 42.Brugge, C, Alexander, H, Hagen, S 1999Stroke patients’ informal caregivers: Patient, caregiver, and service factors that affect caregiver strainStroke2015171523Google Scholar
- 43.Van Exel NJA, Van den Berg B, Van den Bos GAM, Koopmanschap MA, Brouwer WBF. Informal care in the Netherlands: A situational sketch of informal care-providers reached by Informal Care Centres. iMTA report 02.58b. Rotterdam: Erasmus MC. 2002. Available from: http://www.bmg.eur.nl/imta/reports.
- 44.Van Exel NJA, Moree M, Koopmanschap MA, Schreuder-Goedheit T, Brouwer WBF. Respite care. n explorative study of demand and use in Dutch informal caregivers. Submitted paper.Google Scholar
- 45.Van den Berg B, Brouwer WBF, van Exel NJA, Koopmanschap MA, van den Bos GAM, Rutten FFH. The opportunity cost method and the proxy good method applied in informal caregivers. Soc Sci & Med, in press.Google Scholar