Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 14, Issue 7, pp 1719–1732 | Cite as

Adaptation, response-shift and quality of life ratings in mentally well and unwell groups

Article

Abstract

In this paper, a novel decomposition of adaptation, focusing on aspirations and resignation, is presented. Adaptation, response-shift and quality of life were assessed over 2 years, using the same methodology in three different health-status groups: severe mental illness (n = 149); common mental disorder (n = 354); and no disorder (n = 583). Adaptation effects occurred in all life domains including health, but in only one third of each sample. As hypothesised, aspirations tended to be associated with lower quality of life (QOL) ratings and resignation was associated with higher QOL scores (although not significantly higher, necessarily). These two effects tended to cancel each other out, so that the overall impact of adaptation was minimal. Health-status, changes in objective situation (e.g. financial circumstances) and changes in depression were all associated with QOL at follow-up, but resignation and aspiration also made independent contributions. Resignation was more closely related to changes in global ratings than to domain-specific ratings, whereas aspirations appeared consistently and made a greater contribution. The results are consistent with other measurement approaches that indicate that adaptation effects in relation to QOL, are not large.

Keywords

Adaptation Aspiration Quality of life Resignation Response-shift 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schwartz, CESprangers, MAG. eds. 2000Adaptation to Changing Health: Response-shift in Quality of Life ResearchAmerican Psychological AssociationWashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chamberlain, H, Zika, S. 1992Stability and change in subjective well-being over short time periodsSoc Indic Res.26107117Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Groot, W, MaasenVanDen Brink, H. 2000Life satisfaction and preference driftSoc Indic Res.50315328Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lepore, S, Eton, DT. 2000Response-shifts in prostate cancer patients: An evaluation of suppressor and buffer modelsSchwartz, CESprangers, MAG. eds. Adaptation to Changing Health: Response-shift in Quality of Life Research.American Psychological AssociationWashington3754Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daltroy, LH, Eaton, HM, Phillips, CB.,  et al. 2000Discrepancies Between self-reported and observed function: Contributions of response-shiftSchwartz, CESprangers, MAG. eds. Adaptation to Changing Health: Response-shift in Quality of Life Research.American Psychological AssociationWashington189200Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bar-On, D, Amir, M. 1993Re-examining quality of life of hypertensives: A new self-structured measureAm J Hypert.66266Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thomas, R, Evans, S, Huxley, P.,  et al. 2002State event relations among indicators of susceptibility to mental distress in WythenshaweSoc Sci Med.55921935PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huxley, P, Evans, S, Leese, M.,  et al. 2004Urban Regeneration and mental healthSoc Psych Epidemiol.39280285Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goldberg, DP, Williams, P. 1988A Users Guide to the General Health QuestionnaireNFER-NelsonWindsor.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burns, T, Creed, F, Fahy, T.,  et al. 1999Intensive versus standard case management for severe psychotic illness: A randomised trialLancet.35321852189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spitzer, RL, Endicott, J, Robins, E. 1978Research diagnostic criteria: Rationale and reliabilityArch Gen Psychiat.35773782PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oliver, JPJ. 1991The social care directive: Development of a quality of life profile for use in community services for the mentally IllSoc Work Soc Sci Rev.3545Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ritsner, R, Kurs, R, Kostisky, A.,  et al. 2002Subjective quality of life in severely mentally ill patients: A comparison of two instrumentsQual Life Res.11553561PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Andrews, FM, Withey, SB. 1976Social Indicators of Perceived Life Quality: Americans Perceptions of Quality of LifePlenum PressNew York.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pallant, J. 2001SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows (Version 10)Open University PressBuckingham.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohen, J. 1988Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences.2ErlbaumHillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tabachnick, BG, Fidell, LS. 2001Using Multivariate Statistics4Allyn & BaconBoston.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Michalos, AC, Zumbo, BD, Hubley, A. 2000Health and the quality of lifeSoc Indicat Res.51245286Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mechanic, D, McAlpine, D, Rosenfield, S.,  et al. 1994Effects of illness attribution and depression on the quality of life among persons with serious mental illnessSoc Sci Medi.39155164Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson, B. 2000Clinical understanding and clinical implications of response-shiftSchwartz, CESprangers, MAG. eds. Adaptation to Changing Health: Response-shift in Quality of Life Research.American Psychological AssociationWashington159174Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sherill Evans, Social Work and Social Care Section (Box 032), Health Services Research DepartmentDavid Goldberg CentreLondonUK

Personalised recommendations