Stated Preferences of Patients with Cancer for Health-related Quality-of-life (HRQOL) Domains During Treatment
- 327 Downloads
Objectives: It is postulated that patients with different cancer diagnoses, stages of disease and treatments will exhibit different individual preferences for health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) functional domains and symptoms. Methods: A stated-preference (SP) instrument incorporating all functional domains and symptoms of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) was administered to 400 patients with either breast (n=150); colorectal (n=150) or non-small cell lung cancer (n=100) who had previously experienced chemotherapy. The SP survey asked patients to make choices between a series of hypothetical functional/symptom pairs defined by combinations of HRQOL attributes, and depicted by levels of functioning and symptomatology. Results: In the 400 patients, considered as one group, role, cognitive, and social functioning, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, appetite loss, diarrhea and financial difficulties were most important, whereas physical and emotional functioning, dyspnea, constipation and insomnia were less important. The four effects that patients with breast cancer most wished to avoid were nausea and vomiting, pain, and decreases in emotional and role functioning. Patients with colorectal cancer listed diarrhea as the second most important effect to avoid (after nausea/vomiting, but before pain and role functioning), whereas those with non-small cell lung cancer listed dyspnea as the fourth most important effect to avoid. Conclusion: These results provide more precise information regarding patient treatment concerns than that provided by the usual measurement of HRQOL. This information can be used by clinical trial investigators to design more precise interventions to improve HRQOL in the domains of greatest importance to patients and by all health care professionals to improve counseling of patients.
KeywordsEORTC QLQ-C30 Health-related quality of life Patient preferences Patient-reported outcomes
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Johnson, FR, Desvousges, WH 1997Estimating stated preferences with rated-pair data: Environmental, health, and employment effects of energy programsJ Environ Econ Manag347999Google Scholar
- 3.Johnson, FR, Desvousges, WH, Ruby, MC, et al. 1998Eliciting stated preferences: An application to willingness to pay for longevityMed Decision Making18S57S67Google Scholar
- 4.Ryan, M, McIntosh, E, Shackley, P 1998Methodological issues in the application of conjoint analysis in health careHealth Eco Lett21521Google Scholar
- 6.Zwerina K, Huber J, Kuhfeld WK. A general method for constructing efficient choice designs. SAS Institute Market Research Document TS-689D, 1996; (http://support.sas. com/techsup/tnote/tnote_stat.html).
- 10.Wolfe, F, Kong, SX 1999Rasch analysis of the Western Ontario MacMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) in 2205 patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgiaAnn Rheumatic Diseases58563568Google Scholar
- 11.Wolfe, F, Michaud, K, Pincus, T 2004Development and validation of the Health Assessment Questionnaire II – a revised version of the Health Assessment QuestionnaireArth Rheumat5032963305Google Scholar
- 15.McFadden, D 1981Econometric models of probabilistic choiceManski, CMcFadden, D eds. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric ApplicationsMIT PressCambridge198272Google Scholar
- 16.Schoenberg R. Constrained Maximum Likelihood. Aptech Systems, Inc. 1996.Google Scholar
- 17.Fayers, P, Weeden, S, Curran, D 1998EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference ValuesEORTC Quality of Life Study GroupBrusselsEORTC Data CentreGoogle Scholar
- 18.Louviere, J 1988Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint AnalysisNewbury ParkSageGoogle Scholar