The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Validation Study of the Thai Version
- 500 Downloads
The objective of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) version 3.0. The questionnaire was completed by 310 cancer patients during their follow-up at 2 teaching hospital oncology clinics. About 70% of participants had advanced stage of cancer and 72% had been receiving chemotherapy. Cronbach’s α coefficients of the six scales were above 0.7, except for cognitive and social function scales. All test–retest reliability coefficients were high. Multitrait scaling analysis showed that all item-scale correlation coefficients met the standards of convergent and discriminant validity. Most scales and items could discriminate between subgroups of patients with different clinical status assessed with the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale. The results suggested that the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General (FACT-G) measured different aspects of quality of life and should be independently used. Testing psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in heterogeneous diagnostic group yield similar results as found in homogeneous group. These results support that the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) has proven to be a reliable and valid measure of the quality of life in Thai patients with various types of cancer.
KeywordsEORTC QLQ-C30 FACT-G Quality of Life Thailand Validation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Goodyear, M, Fraumeni, M 1996Incorporating quality of life assessment into clinical cancer trialsSpilker, B eds. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical TrialsLipincott-RavenPhiladelphia, PA10031013Google Scholar
- 9.Montazeri, A, Harirchi, I, Vahdani, M, Khaleghi, F, Jarvandi, S, Ebrahimi, M, et al. 1999The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Translation and validation study of the Iranian versionSupport Care Cancer7400406PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Thongprasert, S 1998Lung cancer and quality of lifeAus N Z J Med28397399Google Scholar
- 14.Sirisinha, T, Ratanatharathorn, V, Jirajarus, M, Sirilerttrakul, S, Silpakit, C, Sirachainan, E, et al. 2002The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire: Translation and reliability study of the Thai versionJ Med Assoc Thai8512101219PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Cronbach L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16Google Scholar
- 16.Nunnally, J 1994Psychometric TheoryMcGraw-HillNew YorkGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kemmler, G, Holzner, B, Kopp, M, Dunser, M, Margreiter, R, Greil, R, et al. 1999Comparison of two quality-of-life instruments for cancer patients: the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30J Clin Oncol1729322940PubMedGoogle Scholar