Quality of Life Research

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 167–172 | Cite as

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Validation Study of the Thai Version

  • Chatchawan SilpakitEmail author
  • Suwanee Sirilerttrakul
  • Manmana Jirajarus
  • Thitiya Sirisinha
  • Ekaphop Sirachainan
  • Vorachai Ratanatharathorn
Brief communication


The objective of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) version 3.0. The questionnaire was completed by 310 cancer patients during their follow-up at 2 teaching hospital oncology clinics. About 70% of participants had advanced stage of cancer and 72% had been receiving chemotherapy. Cronbach’s α coefficients of the six scales were above 0.7, except for cognitive and social function scales. All test–retest reliability coefficients were high. Multitrait scaling analysis showed that all item-scale correlation coefficients met the standards of convergent and discriminant validity. Most scales and items could discriminate between subgroups of patients with different clinical status assessed with the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale. The results suggested that the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General (FACT-G) measured different aspects of quality of life and should be independently used. Testing psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in heterogeneous diagnostic group yield similar results as found in homogeneous group. These results support that the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) has proven to be a reliable and valid measure of the quality of life in Thai patients with various types of cancer.


EORTC QLQ-C30 FACT-G Quality of Life Thailand Validation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lee, SJ, Earle, CC, Weeks, JC 2000Outcomes research in oncology: History, conceptual framework, and trends in the literatureJ Natl Cancer Inst92195204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goodyear, M, Fraumeni, M 1996Incorporating quality of life assessment into clinical cancer trialsSpilker, B eds. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical TrialsLipincott-RavenPhiladelphia, PA10031013Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aaronson, NK, Ahmedzai, S, Bergman, B, Bullinger, M, Cull, A, Duez, NJ,  et al. 1993The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncologyJ Natl Cancer Inst85365376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhao, H, Kanda, K 2004Testing psychometric properties of the standard Chinese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)J Epidemiol14193203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chie, WC, Yang, CH, Hsu, C, Yang, PC 2004Quality of life of lung cancer patients: Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13Qual Life Res13257262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kobayashi, K, Takeda, F, Teramukai, S, Gotoh, I, Sakai, H, Yoneda, S,  et al. 1998A cross-validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for Japanese with lung cancerEur J Cancer34810815CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yun, Y, Park, YS, Lee, ES, Bang, SM, Heo, DS, Park, SY,  et al. 2004Validation of the korean version of hte Eortc QlQ-C30Qual. Life Res.13863868CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheung, YB, Thumboo, J, Goh, C, Khoo, KS, Che, W, Wee, J 2004The equivalence and difference between the English and Chinese versions of two major, cancer-specific, health-related quality-of-life questionnairesCancer10128742880PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Montazeri, A, Harirchi, I, Vahdani, M, Khaleghi, F, Jarvandi, S, Ebrahimi, M,  et al. 1999The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Translation and validation study of the Iranian versionSupport Care Cancer7400406PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schipper, H, Clinch, J, McMurray, A, Levitt, M 1984Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: The functional living index-cancer: Development and validationJ Clin Oncol2472483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cella, DF, Tulsky, DS, Gray, G, Sarafian, B, Linn, E, Bonomi, A,  et al. 1993The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measureJ Clin Oncol11570579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thongprasert, S 1998Lung cancer and quality of lifeAus N Z J Med28397399Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ratanatharathorn, V, Sirilerttrakul, S, Jirajarus, M, Silpakit, C, Maneechavakajorn, J, Sailamai, P,  et al. 2001Quality of life, functional assessment of cancer therapy – GeneralJ Med Assoc Thai8414301442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sirisinha, T, Ratanatharathorn, V, Jirajarus, M, Sirilerttrakul, S, Silpakit, C, Sirachainan, E,  et al. 2002The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire: Translation and reliability study of the Thai versionJ Med Assoc Thai8512101219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cronbach L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nunnally, J 1994Psychometric TheoryMcGraw-HillNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ringdal, GI, Ringdal, K 1993Testing the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire on cancer patients with heterogeneous diagnosesQual Life Res2129140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Osoba, D, Zee, B, Pater, J, Warr, D, Kaizer, L, Latreille, J 1994Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancerQual Life Res3353364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hjermstad, MJ, Fossa, SD, Bjordal, K, Kaasa, S 1995Test/retest study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life QuestionnaireJ Clin Oncol1312491254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ferrell, BR, Dow, KH, Grant, M 1995Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivorsQual Life Res4523531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kemmler, G, Holzner, B, Kopp, M, Dunser, M, Margreiter, R, Greil, R,  et al. 1999Comparison of two quality-of-life instruments for cancer patients: the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30J Clin Oncol1729322940PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holzner, B, Kemmler, G, Sperner-Unterweger, B, Kopp, M, Dunser, M, Margreiter, R,  et al. 2001Quality of life measurement in oncology – A matter of the assessment instrumentEur J Cancer3723492355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chatchawan Silpakit
    • 1
    Email author
  • Suwanee Sirilerttrakul
    • 2
  • Manmana Jirajarus
    • 2
  • Thitiya Sirisinha
    • 3
  • Ekaphop Sirachainan
    • 3
  • Vorachai Ratanatharathorn
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryFaculty of Medicine at Ramathibodi HospitalRajathewee, BangkokThailand
  2. 2.Department of NursingMahidol UniversityRajathewee, BangkokThailand
  3. 3.Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol UniversityRajathewee, BangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations