Quality of Life Research

, Volume 13, Issue 10, pp 1725–1735 | Cite as

Validation of the ‘Vienna List’ as a proxy measure of quality of life

Article

Abstract

The reason for the study was to investigate the discriminative, content- and criterion-related validity of the ‘Vienna List’, a newly developed proxy-rating measurement for quality of life in very old and severely demented persons. The total population of patients of a geriatric rehabilitation clinic of one year (from November 2001 to October 2002; n=687) was evaluated at admission and discharge by means of this proxy rating method together with the mini mental state examination, the timed up and go test, the Tinetti measure, the Barthel Index, and the Katz activities of daily living list. Differences, mainly on factors communication, mobility, aggression, and negative affect, appeared between seven diagnostic groups as well between several care-related categories and destination after discharge. The five factors of the measurement explained a significant amount of variance with a high specificity and more than 50% of the Barthel Index scores. The ‘Vienna List’, originally developed for the assessment of quality of life in severely demented patients, proved to be a useful, differentiating, less time-consuming and practical tool for the documentation of the outcome of geriatric inpatient rehabilitation, as well.

Keywords

Geriatric inpatients Rehabilitation Severely demented Validity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Calman, K.C. 1984Quality of life in cancer patients-an hypothesis.J Med Ethics10124127Google Scholar
  2. WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1403--1410. Google Scholar
  3. Silberfeld, M., Rueda, S., Krahn, M., Naglie, G. 2002Content␣validity for dementia of three generic preference based␣health related quality of life instruments: European quality of life instrument, health utilities index, and quality of well-being (QWB) scaleQual Life Res117179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Rabins, P.V., Kasper, J.D., Kleinman, L., Black, B.S., Patrick, D.L. 1999Concepts and methods in the development of the ADRQL: An instrument for assessing health-related quality of life in persons with Alzheimer’s disease.J Ment Health Aging53348Google Scholar
  5. Dodds, T.A., Martin, D.P., Stolov, W.C., Deyo, R.A. 1993A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients.Arch Phys Med Rehab74531536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barofsky, I. 1996

    Cognitive aspects of quality of life assessment

    Spilker, B. eds. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical TrialsLippincott-Raven PublishersPhiladelphia, New York
    Google Scholar
  7. Lawton, M., Van Haitsma, K., Klapper, J. 1996Observed affect in nursing home residents with Alzheimer’s disease.J Gerontol51B314Google Scholar
  8. Kitwood, T., Bredin, K. 1997 Evaluating Dementia Care: The DCM Method7Bradford Dementia Research Group, Bradford UniversityBradford, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  9. Yamamoto-Mitani, N., Abe, T., Okita, Y., Hayashi, K., Sugishita, C., Kamata, K. 2002Development of a Japanese quality␣of life instrument for older adults experiencing dementia␣(QLDJ).Intern J Aging Hum Dev557179Google Scholar
  10. Porzsolt F, Kojer M, Schmidl M, Greimel ER, Sigle J, Richter J, Eisemann M. A new instrument to describe indicators of well-being in old-old patients with severe dementia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 10. Google Scholar
  11. Richter, J., Schwarz, M., Eisemann, M., Bauer, B. 2003Quality of life as an indicator for successful geriatric inpatient rehabilitation – a validation study of the ‘Vienna List’.Arch Geront Geriat37265276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mahoney, F., Barthel, D.W. 1965Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index.Maryland St Medl J146165Google Scholar
  13. McMeeken, J., Stillman, B., Story, I., Kent, P., Smith, J. 1999The effect of knee extensor and flexor muscle training on the timed-up-and-go test in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis.Physiother Res Int45567Google Scholar
  14. Podsiadlo, D., Richardson, S. 1991The timed ‘up and go’: A test of basic mobility for frail elderly persons.J Am Geriatr Soc39142148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wall, J.C., Bell, C., Campbell, S., Davis, J. 2000The timed get-up-and-go test revisited: Measurement of the component tasks.J Rehabil Res Dev37109113Google Scholar
  16. Reuben, D.B., Siu, A.L., Kimpau, S. 1992The predictive validity of self-report and performance-based measures of function␣and healthJ Gerontol47M106M110Google Scholar
  17. Tinetti, M.E. 1986Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients.J Am Geriatr Soc34119126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., McHugh, P.R. 1975Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.J Psychiat Res12189198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Aske, D. 1990The correlation between mini-mental state examination scores and Katz ADL status among dementia patientsRehabil Nurs15140142146Google Scholar
  20. Harper, R.G., Chacko, R.C., Kotik-Harper, D., Kirby, H.B. 1992Comparison of two cognitive screening measures for efficacy in differentiating dementia from depression in a geriatric inpatient population.J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci4179184Google Scholar
  21. Resnick, B., Daly, M.P. 1998Predictors of functional ability in geriatric rehabilitation patients.Rehabil Nurs232129Google Scholar
  22. Tombaugh, T.N., McIntyre, N.J. 1992The mini-mental state examination: A comprehensive review.J Am Geriatr Soc40922935PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Katz, S., Ford, A.B., Moskowitz, R.W., Jackson, B.A., Jaffe, M.W. 1963Studies of illness in the aged: The index of ADL.J Am Med Assoc185914919Google Scholar
  24. Katz, S. 1983Assessing self-maintenance: Activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living.J␣Am Geriatr Soc31721725Google Scholar
  25. Roper, N. 1994aDefinition of nursing: 1Br J Nurs3355357Google Scholar
  26. Roper, N. 1994bDefinition of nursing: 2Br J Nurs3460462Google Scholar
  27. Furlan, P., Galle, B., Petek, C. 1997Care planning and care documentation according to Nancy Roper’s model (article in German).Österr Krankenpflegez502224Google Scholar
  28. Husken, W.S. 1997Nancy Roper and her model of activities of daily living (article in German).Krankenpfl Soins Infirm902223Google Scholar
  29. Bobath, B. 1971Motor development, its effect on general development, and application to the treatment of cerebral palsy.Physiother57526532Google Scholar
  30. Bobath, B. 1977Treatment of adult hemiplegia.Physiother63310313Google Scholar
  31. Langmann, M. 1996The Bobath concept – a part of nursing. The␣Bobath concept as a practice oriented model of care␣for␣stroke patients – in training and in practice (article␣in␣German)Österr Krankenpflegez492628Google Scholar
  32. Panturin, E. 2001The Bobath concept.Clin Rehabil15111113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steinmetz, U. 1993Bobath’s treatment of movement disorders (article in German).Dtsch Krankenpflegez46187189Google Scholar
  34. Marcoen, A., van Cotthem, K., Billiet, K., Beyers, W. 2002Dimensions of subjective well-being in elderly persons (article in Dutch).Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr33156165Google Scholar
  35. Hübinger, H.D. 1993Die Pflegepersonalregelung (PPR).Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher SchwesternverbändeBonnGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clinic of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyUniversity of RostockRostockGermany
  2. 2.Bethesda ClinicGeriatric Rehabilitation Clinic NeubrandenburgNeubrandenburgGermany
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations