Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 1433–1438 | Cite as

Validating and norming of the Greek SF-36 Health Survey

  • Evelina Pappa
  • Nick Kontodimopoulos
  • Dimitris Niakas
Brief Communication

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to validate the Greek SF-36 Health Survey and to provide general population normative data. The survey was administered to a stratified representative sample (n=1426) of the general population residing in the broader Athens area and the response rate was 70.6. Statistical analysis, according to documented procedures developed within the IQOLA Project, was performed. The missing value rate was very low, ranging from 0.1 to 1.3 at the item level. Multitrait scaling analysis confirmed the hypothesized scale structure of the SF-36. Cronbach’s α coefficient met the criterion for group analysis in all eight scales. Known group comparisons yielded consistent support of construct validity of the SF-36. Significant statistical differences in mean scores were observed in relation to demographic and social characteristics such as gender, age, education and marital status.

Keywords

Multitrait scaling Normative data Quality of life Reliability SF–36 Validity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tountas, Y, Demakakos, P, Yfantopoulos, J, Aga, J, Houliara, L, Pavi, E. 2003The health related quality of life of the employees in the Greek hospitals: Assessing how healthy are the health workersHealth Qual Life Outcomes.161CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yfantopoulos, J, Pierrakos, G, Zanakis, V. 2001A comparative study of the quality of life of patients with hepatitis CArch Hellenic Med.18288296Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ware, JE, Gandek, B. 1998Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the international quality of life assessment (IQOLA) ProjectJ Clin Epidemiol51903912CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ware, JE, Snow, KK, Kosinski, M, Gandek, B. 1993SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation GuideBostonNew EnglandGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ware, JE, Gandek, B. 1998Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions and reliability: The IQOLA Project ApproachJ Clin Epidemiol.51945952CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nunnaly, JC, Bernstein, IR. 1994Psychometric Theory, 3rd edMcGraw-HillNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gandek, B, Ware, JE. 1998Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: The IQOLA Project ApproachJ Clin Epidemiol51953959CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gandek, B, Ware, JE. 1998Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and reliability of the SF-36 in Eleven Countries: Results from the IQOLA Project.J Clin Epidemiol.3611491158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shadbolt, B, McCallum, J, Singh, M. 1997Health outcomes by self-report: Validity of the SF-36 among Australian hospital patientsQual Life Res.6343352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Havard Loge, J, Kaasa, S, Hjermstad, J, Kvien, TK. 1998Translation and performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. I. Data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validityJ Clin Epidemiol.5110691076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bjorner, JB, Damsgaard, M, Watt, T, Groenvold, M. 1998Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and reliability of the Danish SF-36J Clin Epidemiol.5110011011CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sullivan, M, Karlsson, J, Ware, JE. 1995The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey-I: Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general population in SwedenSoc Sci Med.4113491358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Apolone, G, Mosconi, P. 1998The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: Translation, validation and normingJ Clin Epidemiol.5110251036CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brazier, JE, Harper, R, Jones, NM. 1992Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: New outcome measure for primary care.Br Med J.305160164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taft, C, Karlsson, J, Sullivan, M. 2004Performance of the Swedish SF-36 version 2Qual Life Res.13251256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leplege, A, Ecosse, E, Verdier, A, Perneger, TV. 1998The French SF-36 Health Survey: Translation, cultural adaptation and preliminary psychometric evaluationJ Clin Epidemiol.5110131023CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garratt, A, Ruta, D. 1993The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: An outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS.Br Med J.30614401444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jenkinsin, C, Coulter, A, Wright, L. 1993Short Form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: Normative data for adults of working ageBr Med J.30614371440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stansfeld, SA, Roberts, R, Foot, SP. 1997Assessing the validity of the SF-36 General Health SurveyQual Life Res.6217224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thumboo, J. 2001A community-based study of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the English (UK) and Chinese (HK) SF-36 in Singapore.Qual Life Res.10175188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evelina Pappa
    • 1
  • Nick Kontodimopoulos
    • 1
  • Dimitris Niakas
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Social SciencesHellenic Open UniversityPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations