Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 1035–1043 | Cite as

Validation of the care notebook for measuring physical, mental and life well-being of patients with cancer

  • Kunihiko KobayashiEmail author
  • Joseph Green
  • Mari Shimonagayoshi
  • Noriaki Kanemoto
  • Ryo Kasai
  • Yoichi Itoh
  • Yuki Fujiki
  • Yasuo Ohashi
  • Carolyn Gotay
  • Shoji Kudoh
Article

Abstract

To measure patients’ QOL in the daily practice of clinical oncology, we developed and tested the Care Notebook. This instrument has 24 questions expressed in single words or short phrases to make it more acceptable to patients. The Care Notebook, EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACIT-Sp-12 were administered to 249 outpatients with cancer. Construct validity was investigated by cluster analysis and multitrait scaling analysis. The results showed that three scales (physical well-being, mental well-being, and life well-being) could explain 55 of the variance in scores. The life well-being scale could be divided into subscales of Daily Functioning, Social Functioning, and Subjective QOL. Multitrait scaling analysis confirmed convergent and discriminant validity of these scales and subscales. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were favorable. Differences in Care Notebook scores were also consistent with differences in performance status rating (known-groups validity), and Care Notebook scores correlated with EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-Sp-12 scores (concurrent validity). The Care Notebook allows clinical oncologists to easily collect valid and reliable QOL information of physical, mental, and life well-being repeatedly and with minimal burden on patients.

Keywords

Care Notebook Life well-being Quality of life Questionnaire Subjective well-being 

Abbreviations:

CORE

Center on Outcomes, Research, and Education

ECOG

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

EORTC

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer

EORTC QLQ-C30

EORTC core questionnaire

FACT-G

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale-General

FACIT-Sp-12

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – The 12-item Spiritual Well-Being Scale

PSR

Performance Status Rating

QOL

Quality of Life

QOL-ACD

Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients Treated with Anticancer Drugs

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aaronson, NK, Ahmedzai, S, Bergman, B,  et al. 1993The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality of Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJ Natl Cancer Inst85365375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cella, DF, Tulsky, DS, Gray, G,  et al. 1993The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measureJ Clin Oncol11570579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kurihara, M, Shimizu, H, Tsuboi, K,  et al. 1999Development of quality of life questionnaire in Japan: Quality of Life Assessment of Cancer Patients Receiving ChemotherapyPsycho Oncol8355363Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    No authors listed Effects of vinorelbine on quality of life and survival of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 66–72 (1999).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kobayashi, K, Takeda, F, Teramukai, S,  et al. 1998A cross-validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for Japanese with lung cancerEur J Cancer34810815PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fumimoto, H, Kobayashi, K, Chang, CH,  et al. 2001Cross-cultural validation of an international questionnaire, the General Measure of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale (FACT-G), for JapaneseQual Life Res10701709PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matsumoto, T, Ohashi, Y, Morita, S,  et al. 2002The quality of life questionnaire for cancer patients treated with anticancer drugs (QOL-ACD): Validity and reliability in Japanese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancerQual Life Res11483493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jacobsen, PB, Davis, K, Cella, D. 2002Assessing quality of life in research and clinical practiceOncol (Huntingt)9133139Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greenfield, S, Nelson, EC. 1992Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settingsMed Care5MS23MS41Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deyo, RA, Patrick, DL. 1989Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation, patient care, and policy researchMed Care.3S254S268Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nelson, EC, Berwick, DM. 1989The measurement of health status in clinical practiceMed Care.3S77S90Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Andoh, M, Kobayashi, K, Kudoh, S,  et al. 1997Using CARE NOTE to measure the level of satisfaction patients feel with their care, in palliative cancer care, as a measure of their quality of lifeJ Nippon Med Sch6418Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bullinger M, Power MJ, Aaronson NK, et al. Creating and evaluating cross-cultural instruments. In: Spilker B. (ed.), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996; 659–668.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peterman, AH, Fitchett, G, Brady, MJ, Hernandez, L, Cella, D. 2002Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy–Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp)Ann Behav Med244958PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clark, WC, Kuhl, JP, Keohan, ML,  et al. 2003Factor analysis validates the cluster structure of the dendrogram underlying the Multidimensional Affect and Pain Survey (MAPS) and challenges the a priori classification of the descriptors in the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)Pain106357363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hays, RD, Hayashi, T, Carson, S. 1988A users guide for the Multitrait Analysis ProgramRand CorporationSanta MonicaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cronbach, LJ. 1951Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of testsPsychometrika.16297Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morris, J, Perez, D, McNoe, B. 1998The use of quality of life data in clinical practiceQual Life Res78591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wasson, J, Keller, A, Rubenstein, L, Hays, R, Nelson, E, Johnson, D. 1992Benefits and obstacles of health status assessment in ambulatory settings The clinician’s point of view. The Dartmouth Primary Care COOP Project.Med Care5MS42MS49Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Detmar, SB, Muller, MJ, Schornagel, JH, Wever, LD, Aaronson, NK. 2002Health-related quality of life assessments and patient-physician communication: A randomized controlled trialJAMA28830273034PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Diener, Ed, Oishi, S, Lucas, RE. 2003Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of lifeAnnu Rev Psychol54403425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ishihara, Y, Sakai, H, Nukariya, N. 1999A diary form quality of life questionnaire for Japanese patients with lung cancer and summarization techniques for longitudinal assessmentRespirology45361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Velikova, G, Booth, L, Smith, AB, Brown, PM, Lynch, P, Brown, JM, Selby, PJ. 2004Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trialJ Clin Oncol22714724PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McLachlan, SA, Allenby, A, Matthews, J, Wirth, A, Kissane, D, Bishop, M, Beresford, J, Zalcberg, J. 2001Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial interventions based on patient self-assessments versus standard care to improve the psychosocial functioning of patients with cancerJ Clin Oncol1941174125PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kunihiko Kobayashi
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 7
    Email author
  • Joseph Green
    • 4
  • Mari Shimonagayoshi
    • 1
  • Noriaki Kanemoto
    • 5
  • Ryo Kasai
    • 5
  • Yoichi Itoh
    • 5
  • Yuki Fujiki
    • 2
  • Yasuo Ohashi
    • 5
  • Carolyn Gotay
    • 6
  • Shoji Kudoh
    • 3
  1. 1.Outpatient ClinicSaitama Cancer CenterSaitamaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Respiratory MedicineSaitama Medical SchoolSaitamaJapan
  3. 3.4th Department of Internal MedicineNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Graduate School of MedicineUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  5. 5.School of Health Science and NursingUniversity of TokyoJapan
  6. 6.Cancer Research Center of HawaiiHonoluluUSA
  7. 7.Department of Respiratory MedicineSaitama Medical SchoolIruma-gun SaitamaJapan

Personalised recommendations