Quality of Life Research

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 1111–1125 | Cite as

On loss of activity and independence, adaptation improves life satisfaction in old age – a qualitative study of patients’ perceptions

  • Anna Cristina Åberg
  • Birgitta Sidenvall
  • Mike Hepworth
  • Karen O’Reilly
  • Hans Lithell


The purpose was to improve the understanding of factors are perceived by elderly people as important for their life satisfaction, during and after rehabilitation. Fifteen persons aged 80–94 years were interviewed while in hospital and on two follow-up occasions after discharge. Assessment of motor function using the General Motor Function assessment scale was used for descriptive purposes. Three themes emerged as important for life satisfaction: activity, independence and adaptation. Activity and independence were considered significant for life satisfaction. Basic activity preferences were related to care of one’s own body and to social contacts. Control and influence over help and services were regarded as important. Different strategies for adaptation to the consequences of disease were used: reorganisation, interaction with caregivers, mental adaptation and mental activities (used as pastime and escape). Those with declined motor functions limited their activity preferences. A key finding was that pleasant past memories were actively recalled in an effort to achieve current life satisfaction. This adaptation strategy created a sense of life satisfaction, however with a potential risk for concealing dissatisfaction with conditions that might otherwise be correctable. Strategies for improving life satisfaction among old people in rehabilitation are suggested.


Activity Adaptation Elderly Independence Life satisfaction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    WHO, International Classification of Impairment, Disabilities and Handicaps; A Manual of Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease. 1980, World Health Organization: GenevaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cella, DF. 1992Quality of life: the conceptJ Palliat Care8813Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Boyle, C. 1997Measuring the quality of later lifePhilos Trans Biol Sci2918711879Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Musschenga, AW. 1997The relation between concepts of quality-of-life, health and happinessJ Med Philos221128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lau, A, McKenna, K. 2002Perception of Quality of Life by Chinese elderly persons with strokeDisabil Rehabil24203218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jacobsen, PB, Davis, K, Cella, D. 2002Assessing quality of life in research and clinical practiceOncology (Huntingt)16133139Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnston, MV, Miklos, CS. 2002Activity-related quality of life in rehabilitation and traumatic brain injuryArch Phys Med Rehabil83S26S38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heady BWA. Understanding Happiness: A Theory of Subjective Well-being. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire, 1992Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meeberg, GA. 1993Quality of life: a concept analysisJ Adv Nurs183238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pavot, , W., ,  et al. 1991Further validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measuresJ Pers Assess57149161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Veenhoven, R. 1996Development in satisfaction-researchSoc Ind Res37146Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Næsss S. (1989). The concept of quality of life, in S. Björk and J.’Vang, (Eds.) Assessing Quality of Life, Samhall Klintland: Linköping, 1989Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bogardus, S, Bradley, E, Tinetti, M. 1998A taxonomy for goal setting in the care of persons with dementiaJ Gen Intern Med13675680PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McWilliam, CL,  et al. 1994A new perspective on threatened autonomy in elderly persons: the disempowering processSoc Sci Med38327338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wressle, EO, Henriksson C, B 1999The rehabilitation process for the geriatric stroke patient–an exploratory study of goal setting and interventionsDisabil Rehabil218087PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baker, S.M.,  et al. 2001Patient participation in physical therapy goal settingPhys Ther8111181126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gilleard, C, Higgs, P. 1998Old people as users and consumers of healthcare: a third age rhetoric for a fourth age reality?Ageing and society18133148Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blumer, H. 1998Symbolic Interactionism-Perspective and MethodUniversity of California PressBerkeley and Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cohen, A. 1994Self Consciousness: An Alternative Anthropology of IdentityRoutledgeLondonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hepworth, M. 2000Stories of AgeingOpen University PressBuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Melin, R. 2003On Life Satisfaction and Vocational Rehabilitation Outcome in Sweden. Faculty of Medicine, Department of NeuroscienceUppsala UniversityUppsalaGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wetzler, HP, Ellwood, PM. 1991Successful outcomes managementFront Health Serv Manage85861PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sarvimaki, A, Stenbock-Hult, B. 2000Quality of life in old age described as a sense of well-being, meaning and valueJ Adv Nurs3210251033PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aharony, L, Strasser, S. 1993Patient satisfaction: what we know about and what we still need to exploreMed Care Rev504979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Folstein, MF, Folstein, SE, McHugh, PR. 1975“Mini-mental state” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinicianJ Psychiatr Res12189198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Åberg, AC, Lindmark, B, Lithell, H. 2003Evaluation and application of the General Motor Function assessment scale in geriatric rehabilitationDisabil Rehabil25360368PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Åberg, AC, Lindmark, B, Lithell, H. 2003Development and reliability of the General Motor Function Assessment Scale (GMF) – A performance-based measure of function-related dependence, pain and insecurityDisabil Rehabil25463472Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Spradley, PJ. 1979The Ethnographic InterviewHolt, Rinehart & WinstonNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hammersley, M, Atkinson, P. 1995Ethnography. Principles in Practice2RoutledgeLondonGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ritchie, JLewis, J. eds. 2003Qualitative Research Practice. A Guide for Social Students and ResearchersSage publicationsLondonGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    WHO,  2001The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, ICFWHOGenevaGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    White, R. 1974Strategies of adaptation an attempt at systematic descriptionCoelho, G.Hamburg, D.Adams, J. eds. Coping and AdaptationBasic booksNew York4768Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Thorén-Jönsson AL. Adaptation and Ability in Daily Occupations in People with Poliomyelitis Sequelae, in Department of rehabilitation medicine. Göteborg University: Göteborg, 2000Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ellefsen, B. 2002Dependency as disadvantage - patients’ experiencesScand J Caring Sci16157164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Leidy, NK, Haase, JE. 1999Functional status from the patient’s perspective: the challenge of preserving personal integrityRes Nurs Health226777PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Atchley, RC. 1999Continuity and Adaptation in Aging: Creating Positive ExperiencesJ. Hopkins University PressBaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Davidson, K. 2001Late life widowhood, selfishness and new partnership choices: a gendered perspectiveAgeing Soc21297317Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cohen A, Taylor L. (1992). Free areas, escape routes and identity sites, in Escape Attempts. The Theory and Practice of Resistance to Everyday Life. Routledge, London 112–153Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Merriam, SB. 1989The structure of simple reminiscenceGerontologist29761767PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bluck, S, Levine, JL. 1998Reminiscence as autobiographical memory: catalyst for reminiscence theory developmentAgeing Soc18185208Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Puentes, WJ. 2001Coping styles, stress levels, and the occurrence of spontaneous simple reminiscence in older adult nursing home residentsIssues Ment Health Nurs225161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cohen, G, Taylor, S. 1998Reminiscence and AgeingAgeing Soc18601610Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Puentes, WJ. 2002Simple reminiscence: a stress-adaptation model of the phenomenonIssues Ment Health Nurs23497511PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lin, YC, Dai, YT, Hwang, SL. 2003The effect of reminiscence on the elderly population: a systematic reviewPublic Health Nurs20297306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Parker, RG. 1995Reminiscence: a continuity theory frameworkGerontologist35515525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Atchley, RC. 1989A continuity theory of normal agingGerontologist29183190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Albrecht, GL, Devlieger, PJ. 1999The disability paradox: high quality of life against all oddsSoc Sci Med48977988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cumming E. Further thoughts on the theory of disengagement. UNESCO - International Social Science Journal 1963; 3: 377–393Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lemon, BW, Bengtson, VL, Peterson, JA. 1972An exploration of the activity theory of aging: activity types and life satisfaction among in-movers to a retirement communityJ Gerontol27511523PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Nygren, C, Iwarsson, S, Dehlin, O. 2000Exploration of subjective well-being and dependence in daily activities at the beginning of the geriatric rehabilitation process: a challenge to traditional goal-setting and evaluation procedures?Arch Gerontol Geriatr30173184PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Cristina Åberg
    • 1
  • Birgitta Sidenvall
    • 2
  • Mike Hepworth
    • 3
  • Karen O’Reilly
    • 3
  • Hans Lithell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Section of GeriatricsUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Section of Caring SciencesUppsala UniversitySweden
  3. 3.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyUniversity of AberdeenScotlandUK

Personalised recommendations