Advertisement

Exploring socio-technical future scenarios in the media: the energy transition case in Italian daily newspapers

  • Federico NeresiniEmail author
  • Paolo Giardullo
  • Emanuele Di Buccio
  • Alberto Cammozzo
Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

The importance of expectations for the future is well recognised within the social sciences. Future scenarios as well as expectations are relevant components of emerging technoscientific innovations to be investigated. The investigation of expectations has been translated into a useful perspective for the sociological gaze seeking insights about innovation processes. In general, a relevant data source about discourses contributing to the construction of innovation networks is the discourse brought up by mass media. Therefore, we selected the media as our area of research for investigating socio-technical future scenarios. This presents several research challenges linked to content analysis and trend analysis. We selected three of them, namely: the detection of future scenarios in the media; wherever different representations of future scenarios do exist, whether they are complementary or competing; and whether and how representations of futures outlined in the past can mobilise actors in the present. We addressed these challenges by proposing a combination of research techniques ranging from text mining to social network analysis.

Keywords

Future scenarios Network analysis Text mining TIPS project 

Notes

References

  1. Alvial-Palavicino, C.: The future as practice. A framework to understand anticipation in science and technology. TECNOSCIENZA: Ital. J. Sci. Technol. Stud. 6(2), 135–172 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. Barkemeyer, R., Givry, P., Figge, F.: Trends and patterns in sustainability-related media coverage: a classification of issue-level attention. Environ. Plan. C Polit. Space 36(5), 937–962 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417732337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer, M.W.: Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology: a cultivation analysis. Public Understand. Sci. 11(2), 93–111 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/11/2/301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bijker, W.: Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  5. Blei, D.M.: Probabilistic topic models. Commun. ACM 55(4), 77 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826. arxiv:1003.4916 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., Van Lente, H.: The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 18(3–4), 285–298 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyd-Graber, J., Hu, Y., Mimno, D.: Applications of topic models. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 11(2–3), 143–296 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boykoff, M.T.: Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the united states and united kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area 39(4), 470–481 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00769.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, N., Michael, M.: A sociology of expectations: retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 15(1), 3–18 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1080/0953732032000046024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, N., Rappert, B., Webster, A.: Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-science. Ashgate, Aldershot (2000)Google Scholar
  12. Clarke, A.E., Star, S.L.: The social worlds framework: a theory/methods package. Handb. Sci. Technol. Stud. 3, 113–137 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. de Laat, B.: Scripts for the future: using innovation studies to design foresight tools. In: Brown, R.B.N., Webster, A. (eds.) Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Technoscience. Ashgate, Aldershot (2000)Google Scholar
  14. Di Buccio, E., Lorenzet, A., Melucci, M., Neresini, F.: Unveiling Latent States Behind Social Indicators. In SoGood@ ECML-PKDD (2016)Google Scholar
  15. Evans, J.A., Aceves, P.: Machine translation: mining text for social theory. Ann. Rev. Social. 42(1), 21–50 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Felt, U., Igelsböck, J., Schikowitz, A., Völker, T.: Transdisciplinary sustainability research in practice: between imaginaries of collective experimentation and entrenched academic value orders. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 41(4), 732–761 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915626989 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gasparini, A.: Prediction and future studies. In: Borgatta, E.F., Montgomery, R.J.V. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Sociology. Macmillan Reference USA, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  18. Geels, F.W.: Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res. Policy 31(8), 1257–1274 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geels, F.W., Sovacool, B.K., Schwanen, T., Sorrell, S.: Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. Science 357(6357), 1242–1244 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3760 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giardullo, P., Lorenzet, A: Techno-scientific issues in the public sphere (TIPS). Eur. Assoc. Study Sci. Technol. EASST Rev. 35(4), 14–17 (2016)Google Scholar
  21. Giardullo, P.: Spreading mosquitoes: A media analysis of Italian national newspaper coverage of mosquito-borne diseases and related interventions. Mosquitoes management: Environmental issues and health concerns, pp 85–111. Brussels: PIE Peter Lang (2019)Google Scholar
  22. Hilgartner, S., Bosk, C.L.: The rise and fall of social problems: a public arenas model. Am. J. Sociol. 94(1), 53–78 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jasanoff, S.: States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Taylor & Francis Group, Milton Park (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jasanoff, S.: Future imperfect: science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In: Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, pp. 1–33. University of Chicago Press (2015).  https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.003.0001
  25. Kirkels, A.: Biomass boom or bubble? A longitudinal study on expectation dynamics. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 103(C), 83–96 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Konrad, K.: The social dynamics of expectations: the interaction of collective and actor-specific expectations on electronic commerce and interactive television. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 18(3–4), 429–444 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2004)Google Scholar
  28. Latour, B.: Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  29. Latour, B.: Reassembling the Social—An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  30. Lee, J., Tkach-Kawasaki, L.: The relationship between information-sharing and resource-sharing networks in environmental policy governance: focusing on in Germany and Japan. J. Contemp. East. Asia 17(2) (2018)Google Scholar
  31. Lee, Y., Bae, S.: Collaboration and confucian reflexivity in local energy governance: the case of Seoul’s one less nuclear power plant initiatives. J. Contemp. East. Asia 18(1), 153–174 (2019)Google Scholar
  32. Marcinkowski, F.: Mediatisation of politics: reflections on the state of the concept. Jav. Public 21(2), 5–22 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2014.11009142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mazzoleni, G., Schulz, W.: “Mediatization” of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Commun. 16(3), 247–261 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neresini, F.: And man descended from the sheep: the public debate on cloning in the Italian press. Public Underst. Sci. 9(4), 359–382 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Neresini, F., Lorenzet, A.: Can media monitoring be a proxy for public opinion about technoscientific controversies? The case of the Italian public debate on nuclear power. Public Underst. Sci. 25(2), 171–185 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Neresini, F.: Old media and new opportunities for a computational social science on PCST. J. Sci. Commun. 16(2), C03 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nerlich, B., Jaspal, R.: Uk media representations of carbon capture and storage: actors, frames and metaphors. Metaphor Soc. World 3(1), 35–53 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.3.1.02ner CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Petrocik, J.R.: Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 40(3), 825–850 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Petrocik, J.R., Benoit, W.L., Hansen, G.J.: Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952–2000. Polit. Sci. Q. 118(4), 599–626 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Redclift, M.: Sustainable development (1987–2005): an oxymoron comes of age. Sustain. Dev. 13(4), 212–227 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sarrica, M., Brondi, S., Cottone, P., Mazzara, B.M.: One, no one, one hundred thousand energy transitions in europe: the quest for a cultural approach. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 13, 1–14 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Selin, C.: Expectations and the emergence of nanotechnology. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 32(2), 196–220 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906296918 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shapin, S.: The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Standish, D.: Italy: renewables policy as a barrier to energy innovation. Energy Environ. 23(6/7), 1005–1025 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stauffacher, M., Muggli, N., Scolobig, A., Moser, C.: Framing deep geothermal energy in mass media: the case of Switzerland. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 98, 60–70 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Torgersen, H., Schmidt, M.: Frames and comparators: How might a debate on synthetic biology evolve? Futures 48, 44–54 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ungar, S.: Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: climate change versus the ozone hole. Public Underst. Sci. 9(3), 297–312 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. van der Brug, W., Berkhout, J.: The effect of associative issue ownership on parties’ presence in the news media. West Eur. Polit. 38(4), 869–887 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1039379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. van Lente, H., Rip, A.: The rise of membrane technology: from rhetorics to social reality. Soc. Stud. Sci. 28(2), 221–254 (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1177/030631298028002002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Venturini, T., Guido, D.: Once upon a text: an ant tale in text analysis. Sociol. Ital. J. Soc Line (2012).  https://doi.org/10.2383/72700 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Webster, J.G., Ksiazek, T.B.: The dynamics of audience fragmentation: public attention in an age of digital media. J. Commun. 62(1), 39–56 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01616.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Pshychology (FISPPA) Section of SociologyUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly
  2. 2.Centre on Environmental, Ethical, Legal and Social Decisions on Emerging Technologies (CIGA)University of PaduaPaduaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Information Engineering and Department of Statistical SciencesUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations