Food risk communication: analysis of the media coverage of food risk on Italian online daily newspapers

  • Barbara TiozzoEmail author
  • Anna Pinto
  • Federico Neresini
  • Stefano Sbalchiero
  • Nicoletta Parise
  • Mirko Ruzza
  • Licia Ravarotto


The present study analysed the media coverage of food risk in the online editions of the four leading Italian daily newspapers in order to explore which topics were mainly covered and which aspects were preferably stressed. The media coverage was compared to data published on the RASFF Portal, in order to verify whether the selected sources worked promoting adequate information about food risks, or rather responding to news making criteria. Time series and content analysis were conducted on 2286 food risk news published between 2010 and 2014. The RASFF Portal returned 2697 alert notifications that were analysed and compared with the media coverage results. Findings show that apart from media peaks the selected sources generally cover food risk without much variability. The great majority of RASFF data did not receive specific mention among the news articles analysed, suggesting that the selected sources cover food safety issues responding more to a gate keeping bias. In relation to food incidents that generated major coverage, apart from the 2011 E. coli outbreak, the media were functioning conveying alarmist messages rather than informing and mitigating risks.


Food risk Media coverage Risk communication Online daily newspapers 



The study was conducted by the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie in cooperation with the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Umbria e delle Marche, the Faculty of Liberal Arts and Philosophy at the University of Catania, the Faculty of Veterinary medicine at the University of Parma, the Observa-Science in Society research centre and the local health authority of Modena.


This work was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health (research project RF IZSVe 1524178/2009 “Reducing unjustified consumer alarmism by mapping, monitoring and improving food safety communication in the media”). The project has also received a grant from FNOVI (the Italian Federation of the Professional Association of Veterinarians).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Aroldi, P., Carlo, S., Colombo, F.: Food safety and risk communication: case histories and best practices (in avian flu). Ital. J. Public Health 4, 13–19 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. Bergeron, C.D., Friedman, D.B.: Developing an evaluation tool for disaster risk messages. Disaster Prev. Manag. Int. J. 24, 570–582 (2015). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry, T.R., Wharf-Higgins, J., Naylor, P.J.: SARS wars: an examination of the quantity and construction of health information in the news media. Health Commun. 21, 35–44 (2007). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolasco, S., De Mauro, T.: L’analisi automatica dei testi : fare ricerca con il text mining. Carocci Editore (2013)Google Scholar
  5. Bomlitz, L.J., Brezis, M.: Misrepresentation of health risks by mass media. J. Public Health (Bangkok) 30, 202–204 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brennan, M., McCarthy, M., Ritson, C.: Why do consumers deviate from best microbiological food safety advice? An examination of ‘high-risk’ consumers on the island of Ireland. Appetite 49, 405–418 (2007). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bucchi, M.: Of deficits, deviations and dialogues: theories of public communication of science. In: Bucchi, M., Trench, B. (eds.) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, pp. 71–90. Routledge, Abingdon (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carducci, A., Alfani, S., Sassi, M., Cinini, A., Calamusa, A.: Mass media health information: quantitative and qualitative analysis of daily press coverage and its relation with public perceptions. Patient Educ. Couns. 82, 475–478 (2011). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carslaw, N.: Communicating risks linked to food—the media’s role. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 19, 17–20 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chatfield, J.R.: The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2004)Google Scholar
  11. Cleveland, R.B., Cleveland, W.S., McRae, J.E., Terpenning, I.: STL: a seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on loess. J. Off. Stat. 6, 3–73 (1990)Google Scholar
  12. De Almeida, M.D., Graça, P., Lappalainen, R., Giachetti, I., Kafatos, A., Remaut de Winter, A., Kearney, J.M.: Sources used and trusted by nationally-representative adults in the European Union for information on healthy eating. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 51(Suppl 2), S16–S22 (1997)Google Scholar
  13. De Jonge, J., Van Trijp, H., Renes, R.J., Frewer, L.J.: Consumer confidence in the safety of food and newspaper coverage of food safety issues: a longitudinal perspective. Risk Anal. 30, 125–142 (2010). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Di Buccio, E., Lorenzet, A., Melucci, M., Neresini, F.: Unveiling latent states behind social indicators. In: Gavaldà, R., ZLiobaite, I., and Gama, J. (eds.) CEUR Workshop Proceedings, First Workshop on Data science for Social Good co-located with European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practices of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, SoGood@ECML-PKDD, Riva del Garda, Italy, pp. 1–15 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. Di Fonzo, T., Lisi, F.: Serie storiche economiche. Carocci (2007)Google Scholar
  16. Driedger, S.M., Jardine, C.G., Boyd, A.D., Mistry, B.: Do the first 10 days equal a year? Comparing two Canadian public health risk events using the national media. Heal. Risk Soc. 11, 39–53 (2009). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ECDC, EFSA: The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2016. EFSA J. (2017). Google Scholar
  18. European Commission: Special Eurobarometer 354 Food-related risks (2010)Google Scholar
  19. Fischler, C.: Food selection and risk perception. In: Proc. from Symp. food Sel. from genes to Cult. 135–149 (2002)Google Scholar
  20. Flament, C.: L’analyse de similitude: une technique pour les recherches sur les représentations sociales [Similarity analysis: a technique for researches in social representations]. Cah. Psychol. Cogn. Psychol. Cogn. 1(4), 375–395 (1981)Google Scholar
  21. Frewer, L.J., Miles, S., Marsh, R.: The media and genetically modified foods: evidence in support of social amplification of risk. Risk Anal. 22, 701–711 (2002). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frost, K., Frank, E., Maibach, E.: Relative risk in the news media: a quantification of misrepresentation. Am. J. Public Health 87, 842–845 (1997). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Galluzzo, N.: Percezione del rischio alimentare da parte del consumatore e ruolo dei mass media: il caso della psicosi da influenza aviaria in Italia. Riv. di Dirit. Aliment. II, 1–10 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. Greenacre, M.J.: Correspondence Analysis in Practice. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grunert, K.G.: Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 32, 369–391 (2005). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hansen, J., Holm, L., Frewer, L., Robinson, P., Sandøe, P.: Beyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite 41, 111–121 (2003). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Havelaar, A.H., Brul, S., de Jong, A., de Jonge, R., Zwietering, M.H., ter Kuile, B.H.: Future challenges to microbial food safety. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 139, S79–S94 (2010). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henderson, J., Wilson, A., Meyer, S.B., Coveney, J., Calnan, M., McCullum, D., Lloyd, S., Ward, P.R.: The role of the media in construction and presentation of food risks. Health. Risk Soc. 16, 615–630 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoelzer, K., Moreno Switt, A.I., Wiedmann, M., Boor, K.J.: Emerging needs and opportunities in foodborne disease detection and prevention: from tools to people. Food Microbiol. 75, 65–71 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Houghton, J.R., Rowe, G., Frewer, L.J., Van Kleef, E., Chryssochoidis, G., Kehagia, O., Korzen-Bohr, S., Lassen, J., Pfenning, U., Strada, A.: The quality of food risk management in Europe: perspectives and priorities. Food Policy 33, 13–26 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Junqué de Fortuny, E., De Smedt, T., Martens, D., Daelemans, W.: Media coverage in times of political crisis: a text mining approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 11616–11622 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kehagia, O., Chrysochou, P.: The reporting of food hazards by the media: the case of Greece. Soc. Sci. J. 44, 721–733 (2007). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kitzinger, J., Reilly, J.: The rise and fall of risk reporting. Eur. J. Commun. 12, 319–350 (1997). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kornelis, M., de Jonge, J., Frewer, L., Dagevos, H.: Consumer selection of food-safety information sources. Risk Anal. 27, 327–335 (2007). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kuttschreuter, M., Rutsaert, P., Hilverda, F., Regan, Á., Barnett, J., Verbeke, W.: Seeking information about food-related risks: the contribution of social media. Food Qual. Prefer. 37, 10–18 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laestadius, L.I., Lagasse, L.P., Smith, K.C., Neff, R.A.: Print news coverage of the 2010 Iowa egg recall: addressing bad eggs and poor oversight. Food Policy 37, 751–759 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu, P., Ma, L.: Food scandals, media exposure, and citizens’ safety concerns: a multilevel analysis across Chinese cities. Food Policy 63, 102–111 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lobb, A.E., Mazzocchi, M., Traill, W.B.: Modelling risk perception and trust in food safety information within the theory of planned behaviour. Food Qual. Prefer. 18, 384–395 (2007). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Löfstedt, R.E.: How can we make food risk communication better: where are we and where are we going? J. Risk Res. 9, 869–890 (2006). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lorenzet, A.: Il lato controverso della tecnoscienza. Nanotecnologie, biotecnologie e grandi opere nella sfera pubblica - Andrea Lorenzet - Libro - Il Mulino - Tecnologie, diritto, etica e società| IBS. Il Mulino, Bologna (2013)Google Scholar
  41. Marchand, P., Ratinaud, P.: L’analyse de similitude appliquée aux corpus textuels : les primaires socialistes pour l’élection présidentielle française (septembre-octobre 2011). In: Actes 11eme Journ. Int. D’Analyse Stat. Données Textuelles - JADT 2012. pp. 687–699 (2012)Google Scholar
  42. McCarthy, M., Brennan, M., De Boer, M., Ritson, C.: Media risk communication—what was said by whom and how was it interpreted. J. Risk Res. 11, 375–394 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meagher, K.D.: (2018): Public perceptions of food-related risks: a cross-national investigation of individual and contextual influences. J. Risk Res. (2018). Google Scholar
  44. Neresini, F., Lorenzet, A.: Can media monitoring be a proxy for public opinion about technoscientific controversies? The case of the Italian public debate on nuclear power. Public Underst. Sci. 25, 171–185 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Neresini, F., Magaudda, P. (eds.): La scienza sullo schermo. La rappresentazione della tecnoscienza nella televisione italiana. Il Mulino, Bologna (2011)Google Scholar
  46. Nicol, A.M., Hurrell, C., McDowall, W., Bartlett, K., Elmieh, N.: Communicating the risks of a new, emerging pathogen: the case of Cryptococcus gattii. Risk Anal. 28, 373–386 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Papadopoulos, A., Sargeant, J.M., Majowicz, S.E., Sheldrick, B., Mckeen, C., Wilson, J., Dewey, C.E.: Enhancing public trust in the food safety regulatory system. Health Policy (N. Y.) 107, 98–103 (2012). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Park, J.-E., Sohn, A.: The influence of media communication on risk perception and behavior related to mad cow disease in South Korea. Osong Public Health Res. Perspect. 4, 203–208 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peters, H.P.: Mass media as an information channel and public arena. In: RISK: Health, Safety & Environment, (vol 5, issue 3). Symposium on technical risk in the mass media, pp. 241–250 (1994)Google Scholar
  50. Raupp, J.: Social agents and news media as risk amplifiers: a case study on the public debate about the E. coli outbreak in Germany 2011. Health Risk Soc. 16, 565–579 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reilly, J.: Food risks, public policy and the mass media. In: Belton, P.S., Belton, T. (eds.) Food Science and Society, pp. 71–90. Springer, Berlin (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reinert, M.: Une Méthode de Classification Descendante Hiérarchique: application À L’analyse Lexicale Par Contexte. Les Cah. L’analyse Lexicale. 8, 187–198 (1983)Google Scholar
  53. Reinert, M.: Le rôle de la répétition dans la représentation du sens et son approche statistique par la mÉthode ALCESTE. Semiotica 2003, 389–420 (2003). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rortais, A., Belyaeva, J., Gemo, M., van der Goot, E., Linge, J.P.: MedISys: an early-warning system for the detection of (re-)emerging food- and feed-borne hazards. Food Res. Int. 43, 1553–1556 (2010). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roslyng, M.M.: Challenging the hegemonic food discourse: the British media debate on risk and salmonella in eggs. Sci. Cult. (Lond) 20, 157–182 (2011). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rowe, G., Frewer, L., Sjoberg, L.: Newspaper reporting of hazards in the UK and Sweden. Public Underst. Sci. 9, 59–78 (2000). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sbalchiero, S., Tuzzi, A.: Scientists’ spirituality in scientists’ words. Assessing and enriching the results of a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews by means of quantitative approaches. Qual. Quant. 50, 1333–1348 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sebastiani, F.: Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comput. Surv. 34, 1–47 (2002). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sell, T.K., Boddie, C., McGinty, E.E., Pollack, K., Smith, K.C., Burke, T.A., Rutkow, L.: News media coverage of U.S. Ebola policies: implications for communication during future infectious disease threats. Prev. Med. (Baltim) 93, 115–120 (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shih, T.-J., Wijaya, R., Brossard, D.: Media coverage of public health epidemics: linking framing and issue attention cycle toward an integrated theory of print news coverage of epidemics. Mass Commun. Soc. 11, 141–160 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sturloni, G.: Food for thought—communicating food-related risks. J. Sci. Commun. 02, A01 (2003). Google Scholar
  62. Swinnen, J.F.M., McCluskey, J., Francken, N.: Food safety, the media, and the information market. Agric. Econ. 32, 175–188 (2005). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tandoc, E.C., Vos, T.P.: THE JOURNALIST IS MARKETING THE NEWS: social media in the gatekeeping process. J. Pract. 10, 950–966 (2016). Google Scholar
  64. Tiozzo, B., Mari, S., Ruzza, M., Crovato, S., Ravarotto, L.: Consumers’ perceptions of food risks: a snapshot of the Italian Triveneto area. Appetite 111, 105–115 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tiozzo, B., Pinto, A., Mascarello, G., Mantovani, C., Ravarotto, L.: Which food safety information sources do Italian consumers prefer? Suggestions for the development of effective food risk communication. J. Risk Res. (2018). Google Scholar
  66. Vasterman, P., Yzermans, C.J., Dirkzwager, A.J.: The role of the media and media hypes in the aftermath of disasters. Epidemiol. Rev. 27, 107–114 (2005). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vasterman, P.L.M.: Media-hype: self-reinforcing news waves, journalistic standards and the construction of social problems. Eur. J. Commun. 20, 508–530 (2005). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Washer, P.: Representations of mad cow disease. Soc. Sci. Med. 62, 457–466 (2006). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wilson, A.M., Henderson, J., Coveney, J., Meyer, S.B., Webb, T., Calnan, M., Caraher, M., Lloyd, S., McCullum, D., Elliott, A., Ward, P.R.: Media actors’ perceptions of their roles in reporting food incidents. BMC Public Health 14, 1305 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health Awareness and Communication DepartmentIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle VenezieLegnaro (Padua)Italy
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology - Section of SociologyUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Statistical ScienceUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations