Advertisement

Quality & Quantity

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 417–434 | Cite as

The welfare effects of fiscal decentralization: a simple model and evidence from China

  • Liangliang Liu
  • Donghong Ding
  • Jun HeEmail author
Article
  • 191 Downloads

Abstract

This study extends the model of three levels of government to two levels, namely, the central government and local government, and uses the Hamilton function method to explore the dynamic relationship between fiscal decentralization and social welfare level. The study uses numerical simulation, results of which reveal that fiscal decentralization and social welfare display an inverse U-shaped relationship. The study also uses China’s panel data to perform an empirical investigation. Our findings demonstrate empirical results that verify the correctness of the theoretical results. This study also analyzes the regional differences in the relationship between fiscal decentralization and social welfare and demonstrates that fiscal decentralization and social welfare have an inverse U-shaped relationship in the eastern, central, and western areas of China, but they still present regional differences. Finally, policies and recommendations are proposed.

Keywords

Endogenous growth Fiscal decentralization Social welfare China 

JEL Classification

B22 D69 H39 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors notably appreciate the National Natural and Science Foundation of China (71573240) for supporting this study.

References

  1. Akai, N., Sakata, M.: Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States. J. Urban Econ. 52(1), 93–108 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. Bahl, R., Linn, J.F.: Urban Public Finance in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  3. Bardhan, P., Mookherjee, D.: Decentralizing antipoverty program delivery in developing countries. J. Public Econ. 89(4), 675–704 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. Bucovetsky, S.: Public input competition. J. Public Econ. 89(9), 1763–1787 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. Bond, S.R.: Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice. Port. Econ. J. 1(2), 141–162 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. Barro, R.J.: Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. J. Polit. Econ. 98(5), 103–125 (1990)Google Scholar
  7. Blanchard, O., Shleifer, A.: Federalism with and without political centralization: China versus Russia. IMF Staff Papers 48(4), 171–179 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. Baskaran, T.: On the link between fiscal decentralization and public debt in OECD countries. Public Choice 145(3–4), 351–378 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. Cavalieri, M., Ferrante, L.: Does fiscal decentralization improve health outcomes? Evidence from infant mortality in Italy. Soc. Sci. Med. 164(9), 74–88 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. Cummins, R.A.: Objective and subjective auality of life: an interactive model. Soc. Indic. Res. 52(1), 55–72 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. Davoodi, H., Zou, H.: Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: a cross country study. J. Urban Econ. 43(2), 244–257 (1998)Google Scholar
  12. De Mello, L.: Does fiscal decentralization strengthen social capital? Cross country evidence and the experiences of Brazil and Indonesia. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 29(2), 281–296 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. Diaz-Serranoa, L., Rodríguez-Pose, A.: Decentralization and the welfare state: What do citizens perceive? Soc. Indic. Res. 120(2), 411–435 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. Enikolopov, R., Zhuravskaya, E.: Decentralization and political institutions. J. Public Econ. 91(11), 2261–2290 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. Faguet, J.P.: Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs? Evidence from Bolivia. J. Public Econ. 88(3), 867–893 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. Graham, C.: The economics of happiness. In: Durlauf, S.N., Blume, L.E. (eds.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2008)Google Scholar
  17. Grisorio, M.J., Prota, F.: The short and the long run relationship between fiscal decentralization and public expenditure composition in Italy. Econ. Lett. 130(3), 113–116 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. Gong, L., Zou, H.: Optimal taxation and intergovernmental transfer in a dynamic model with multiple levels of government. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 26(12), 1975–2003 (2002)Google Scholar
  19. Gong, L., Zou, H.: Foreign aid reduces labor supply and capital accumulation. Rev. Dev. Econ. 5(1), 105–118 (2001)Google Scholar
  20. Ghuman, B.S., Singh, R.: Decentralization and delivery of public services in Asia. Policy Soc. 32(1), 7–21 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. Hao, R., Wei, Z.: Fundamental causes of Inland–coastal income inequality in post-reform China. Ann. Reg. Sci. 45(1), 181–206 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. He, Q.: Fiscal decentralization and environmental pollution: evidence from Chinese panel data. China Econ. Rev. 36(4), 86–100 (2015)Google Scholar
  23. Hayek, F.A.: Economic conditions of intestate federalism. New Commonw. Q. 5(2), 131–149 (1939)Google Scholar
  24. Hu, J.L., Wang, S.C.: Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy 34(17), 3206–3217 (2006)Google Scholar
  25. Jin, H., Qian, Y., Weingast, B.R.: Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: federalism, Chinese style. J. Public Econ. 89(9), 1719–1742 (2005)Google Scholar
  26. Jiménez-Rubio, D.: The impact of fiscal decentralization on infant mortality rates: evidence from OECD countries. Soc. Sci. Med. 73(9), 1401–1407 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. Jia, J., Guo, Q., Zhang, J.: Fiscal decentralization and local expenditure policy in China. China Econ. Rev. 28(3), 107–122 (2014)Google Scholar
  28. Khaleghian, P.: Decentralization and public services: the case of immunization. Soc. Sci. Med. 59(1), 163–183 (2004)Google Scholar
  29. Kappeler, A., Välilä, T.: Fiscal federalism and the composition of public investment in Europe. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 24(3), 562–570 (2008)Google Scholar
  30. Keen, M., Marchand, M.: Fiscal competition and the pattern of public spending. J. Public Econ. 66(1), 33–53 (1997)Google Scholar
  31. Klugman, J.: Decentralisation: A Survey of Literature from a Human Development Perspective. OP 13, Human Development Report Office, UNDP, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  32. Lin, J.Y., Liu, Z.: Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in China. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 49(1), 1–21 (2000)Google Scholar
  33. Li, H., Zhou, L.A.: Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in China. J. Public Econ. 89(9), 1743–1762 (2005)Google Scholar
  34. Liu, J., Diamond, J.: China’s environment in a globalizing world. Nature 435(7046), 1179–1186 (2005)Google Scholar
  35. Liu, C., Guo, X., Jian, F.: Social welfare index, governmental expenditure scale and its structural optimization. J. Public Manag. 5(3), 91–99 (2008). (Chinese) Google Scholar
  36. Maskin, E., Qian, Y., Xu, C.: Incentives, scale economies, and organization forms. Rev. Econ. Stud. 67(6), 359–378 (2000)Google Scholar
  37. Oates, W.E.: Fiscal Federalism. Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  38. Presbitero, A.F., Sacchi, A., Zazzaro, A.: Property tax and fiscal discipline in OECD countries. Econ. Lett. 124(3), 428–433 (2014)Google Scholar
  39. Pesaran, M. H.: General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics Number 0435, University of Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  40. Pesaran, M.H.: A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J. Appl. Econ. 22(2), 265–312 (2007)Google Scholar
  41. Qian, Y., Xu, C.: Why China’s economic reforms differ: the M-form hierarchy and entry/expansion of the non-state sector. Econ. Transit. 1(2), 135–170 (1993)Google Scholar
  42. Rodríguez-Pose, A., Sandall, R.: From identity to the economy: analysing the evolution of the decentralisation discourse. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 26(1), 54–72 (2008)Google Scholar
  43. Romero-Ávila, D.: Convergence in carbon dioxide emissions among industrialised countries revisited. Energy Econ. 30(5), 2265–2282 (2008)Google Scholar
  44. Sigman, H.: Decentralization and environmental quality: an international analysis of water pollution. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Number 13098, Boston (2007)Google Scholar
  45. Sadorsky, P.: Do urbanization and industrialization affect energy intensity in developing countries? Energy Econ. 37(5), 52–59 (2013)Google Scholar
  46. Shen, J.: A simultaneous estimation of environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from China. China Econ. Rev. 17(4), 383–394 (2006)Google Scholar
  47. Song, T., Zheng, T., Tong, L.: An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: a panel cointegration approach. China Econ. Rev. 19(3), 381–392 (2008)Google Scholar
  48. Salter, F.: Welfare, Ethnicity and Altruism: New Data and Evolutionary Theory. Frank Cass, London (2013)Google Scholar
  49. Tiebout, C.M.: A pure theory of local expenditures. J. Polit. Econ. 64(5), 416–424 (1956)Google Scholar
  50. Turnovsky, S.: Fiscal policy, elastic labor supply, and endogenous growth. J. Monet. Econ. 45(1), 185–210 (2000)Google Scholar
  51. Uchimura, H., Jütting, J.P.: Fiscal decentralization, Chinese style: Good for health outcomes? World Dev. 37(12), 1926–1934 (2009)Google Scholar
  52. Wilson, J.D.: A theory of interregional tax competition. J. Urban Econ. 19(3), 296–315 (1986)Google Scholar
  53. Wildasin, D.E.: Interjurisdictional capital mobility: fiscal externality and a corrective subsidy. J. Urban Econ. 25(2), 193–212 (1989)Google Scholar
  54. Wu, Y., Heerink, N.: Foreign direct investment, fiscal decentralization and land conflicts in China. China Econ. Rev. 38(4), 92–107 (2016)Google Scholar
  55. Wooldridge, J.: Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 5th edn. South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati (2012)Google Scholar
  56. Xie, D., Zou, H., Davoodi, H.: Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in the United States. J. Urban Econ. 45(2), 228–239 (1999)Google Scholar
  57. Yang, Z.: Tax reform, fiscal decentralization, and regional economic growth: new evidence from China. Econ. Model. 59(6), 520–528 (2016)Google Scholar
  58. Zhang, T., Zou, H.: Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth in China. J. Public Econ. 67(2), 221–240 (1998)Google Scholar
  59. Zhuravskaya, E.V.: Incentives to provide local public goods: fiscal federalism, Russian style. J. Public Econ. 76(3), 337–368 (2000)Google Scholar
  60. Zhang, T., Zou, H.: The growth impact of intersectoral and intergovernmental allocation of public expenditure: with applications to China and India. China Econ. Rev. 12(1), 58–81 (2001)Google Scholar
  61. Zhang, J., Zhang, J.: Long-run effects of unfunded social security with earnings-dependent benefits. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 28(3), 617–641 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Finance and TaxationNanjing University of Finance & EconomicsNanjingChina
  2. 2.School of ManagementUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations